Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

Officials in firing line after England's win over Ireland

By Josh Raisey
There were some heated exchanges during England's defeat of Ireland.

It is not uncommon for the match officials to be on the receiving end of tirades from unhappy coaches, players and fans after a match, usually a loss. 

ADVERTISEMENT

However, in the wake of England’s 24-12 win over Ireland at Twickenham on Sunday, those from both sides of the Irish Sea have objected to the officiating of the Test. 

In a game where the ruck seemed to descend to anarchy at times, with players playing fast and loose with the offside law, former England international Andy Goode has suggested Jaco Peyper favoured the home side. 

Jim Hamilton concurred, citing Jonny May’s break in the second half that came from slapping the ball from scrumhalf Conor Murray’s hands. That actually preceded a tackle off the ball from Robbie Henshaw that has proved to be equally contentious, and was also missed. 

https://twitter.com/AndyGoode10/status/1231617985128927233?s=20

 

English and Irish fans have both accused the South African referee of being biased, which perhaps suggests that he was more neutral than many would like to think. But there were undoubtedly some decisions that went unnoticed. 

Very few, if any, would argue that the referee swayed the result of the game, as England were significantly strong, particularly in the first half, but that should not excuse the standard of the officiating. 

https://twitter.com/GormleyDanny/status/1231622632111575040?s=20

ADVERTISEMENT

https://twitter.com/rejemy777/status/1231622835422011400?s=20

 

In a contest that was full of scuffles and niggly events, the apparent silence of the television match official Marius Jonker has also been questioned. The TMO is at liberty to intervene if foul play is suspected, but Jonker largely abstained on Sunday. 

https://twitter.com/Nick88Will/status/1231612533762555904?s=20

An altercation between Owen Farrell and CJ Stander in the second half was one instance which has been widely discussed post-match, as have a couple of shots from James Ryan on Tom Curry and Maro Itoje, which by current standards could potentially have been red cards. 

The majority of criticism that has been directed at referees and TMOs over the past year is that they are draconian to the point where some feel it has killed games off. This is understandable as World Rugby seeks to make the game safer. However, it was bedlam at times at Twickenham, both in terms of foul play and the laws of the game, which has proven to be equally controversial. 

ADVERTISEMENT

Watch: All Blacks star Ardie Savea reveals shock rugby league ambitions

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Fresh Starts | Episode 2 | Sam Whitelock

Royal Navy Men v Royal Air Force Men | Full Match Replay

Royal Navy Women v Royal Air Force Women | Full Match Replay

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 9

James Cook | The Big Jim Show | Full Episode

New Zealand victorious in TENSE final | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Men's Highlights

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

F
Flankly 11 hours ago
The AI advantage: How the next two Rugby World Cups will be won

If rugby wants to remain interesting in the AI era then it will need to work on changing the rules. AI will reduce the tactical advantage of smart game plans, will neutralize primary attacking weapons, and will move rugby from a being a game of inches to a game of millimetres. It will be about sheer athleticism and technique,about avoiding mistakes, and about referees. Many fans will find that boring. The answer is to add creative degrees of freedom to the game. The 50-22 is an example. But we can have fun inventing others, like the right to add more players for X minutes per game, or the equivalent of the 2-point conversion in American football, the ability to call a 12-player scrum, etc. Not saying these are great ideas, but making the point that the more of these alternatives you allow, the less AI will be able to lock down high-probability strategies. This is not because AI does not have the compute power, but because it has more choices and has less data, or less-specific data. That will take time and debate, but big, positive and immediate impact could be in the area of ref/TMO assistance. The technology is easily good enough today to detect forward passes, not-straight lineouts, offside at breakdown/scrum/lineout, obstruction, early/late tackles, and a lot of other things. WR should be ultra aggressive in doing this, as it will really help in an area in which the game is really struggling. In the long run there needs to be substantial creativity applied to the rules. Without that AI (along with all of the pro innovations) will turn rugby into a bash fest.

24 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE Bryan Habana: 'Sevens already had its watershed moment when it became an Olympic sport' Bryan Habana: 'Sevens already had its watershed moment when it became an Olympic sport'
Search