Northern | US

Kriel: 'I think as South Africans we are a pretty resilient bunch'

Jesse Kriel of South Africa celebrates victory at full-time following the Rugby World Cup France 2023 Quarter Final match between France and South Africa at Stade de France on October 15, 2023 in Paris, France. (Photo by Mike Hewitt/Getty Images)
Comments
10 Comments

Springboks centre Jesse Kriel has lauded the resilience of his South African teammates after they beat France by a single point in a thrilling Rugby World Cup quarter-final win in Paris last night.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Boks edged the hosts 29-28, coming back from an early French try to outscore the French in a harum-scarum contest in the French capital.

Kriel was a bloody mess by the end of the game after needing stitches in his head after suffering a laceration in the second off from an accidental collision.

Video Spacer

WATCH as French captain Antoine Dupont spits the dummy about some of referee Ben O’Keeffe’s decision in their one-point loss to South Africa

Video Spacer

WATCH as French captain Antoine Dupont spits the dummy about some of referee Ben O’Keeffe’s decision in their one-point loss to South Africa

“Yah, I got a few, I don’t know how many, it’s quite a big cut,” said Kriel. “I don’t know, I think just hitting a guy’s hip or something, a bit of bone on bone. Luckily it’s all good and it was just a cut. Luckily these things heal.

“After November’s loss against them we were disappointed and we wanted to make that right. So, it was nice to get an opportunity tonight to fix that.”

Kriel said that the Springboks refused to panic after an early French try threatened to set the tone for the game.

“Look, we simulate these things throughout the week and I think as South Africans we are a pretty resilient bunch and I think it’s all things that we’ve experienced before in rugby games. And yeah, I thought we bounced back well.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Obviously, taking no credit away from the French. They are an unbelievable side and we knew they’d come out firing in front of a massive crowd. I think the response was good.

“The most important thing is we got the result, we got what we came here for tonight. There is still a lot of rugby to be played in this tournament, another two big games and obviously not looking past next week and semi-finals.

“It’s just about getting back to the drawing board tomorrow and getting the bodies fresh and all eyes on Saturday.”

South Africa now play England in the semi-final next week in Paris.

ADVERTISEMENT

Related

ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

10 Comments
Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

D
David Laurenson 1 hour ago
Has the balance between attack and defence become too lopsided?

I and the many others could not disagree more. The score lines are reflective of mainly the ability of the more dominate team, on the day. Forward tries by crash n bash, The illegal mauls, where players are ahead of the ball carrier are an easy score. The one area where the offence team is king though is the Maul !The defensive capabilities to stop a maul are nil, it used to be that all players were not offside as long as they had contact with another player. This was mandatory whether or not you were at the sides or in fact anywhere in the meelay. Now you have to retreat on the refs call to the back, you can’t even tackle the ball carrier, as you then get penalized for collapsing the maul. ALL the advantage is with the offensive side, Mauls are a freeby ! The structure that favors forward participation is predicable and boring. Backs have had to become forwards ! Line speed has totally killed off, running play. To qualify the offside laws have not or seldom been altered since rugby went professional. No compensation has been made for these elite athletes of today, meaning LESS time and SPACE to find a gap. Our game is compressed. We see all games where the pass is made and the receiver getting cleaned out. What does this tell us ? As coaches you have designed a bar the door screen of players, we have pods of forwards, hitting up with intent yet hardly making the gain line, time and time again. with phase play in the thirties. Backs are now used as forwards to hit it up and hopefully retain possession from the tackled ball or ruck. If you diagnosed our game with mathematicians and engineers, they would come up with two causes. Either you have less players, or you enlarge the field of play. Of course this would not be entertained, so the obvious solution is to add a metre to all the current off side laws. WHY to give a little time and space for the offensive team to attack, that’s right the opposite to what we have just read, but for both sides this would allow some freedom for backs to be backs, less kicking, less forward interference, we may even get our game back as it would be more enjoyable to play, to follow, to ref, fans could actually view tactics in motion as against the current predictability. Compression is negative, a little separation freedom.

6 Go to comments
Close Panel
Close Panel

Edition & Time Zone

{{current.name}}
Set time zone automatically
{{selectedTimezoneTitle}} (auto)
Choose a different time zone
Close Panel

Editions

Close Panel

Change Time Zone

Close
ADVERTISEMENT
Copied to clipboard

Share Article close