Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

Ireland could yet have last laugh on World Rugby Men's Rankings

By Ian Cameron
Rieko Ioane of New Zealand celebrates victory at full-time following the Rugby World Cup France 2023 Quarter Final match between Ireland and New Zealand at Stade de France on October 14, 2023 in Paris, France. (Photo by Hannah Peters/Getty Images)

Ireland could theoretically return to the No.1 spot in the World Rugby Men’s Rankings this weekend, despite being eliminated from the Rugby World Cup last weekend by New Zealand.

ADVERTISEMENT

The All Blacks also stand on the precipice of regaining the coveted number one spot if they emerge victorious against Argentina, coupled with a potential South African loss to England.

The All Blacks, who have not held the top-ranking since November 2021, could see the Springboks tumble two places down to third in this dramatic scenario.

Video Spacer

WATCH as Springbok flyhalf speaks about the residual beef England will have after the 2019 World Cup Final loss to South Africa

Video Spacer

WATCH as Springbok flyhalf speaks about the residual beef England will have after the 2019 World Cup Final loss to South Africa

However, should both South Africa and New Zealand falter in their quests for a record fourth Rugby World Cup triumph, the top spot will be ceded back to Ireland.

A narrow defeat for the South Africans would still see them relinquish one place, slipping to second, with England surging ahead to fourth place, leaving New Zealand behind.

Argentina also have rankings skin in the game. A triumph against New Zealand would propel them up the rankings, with a potential leap to third place, a position they have not occupied since June 2008. To achieve this, they must secure a victory against the All Blacks by a margin exceeding 15 points, while hoping for an equivalent winning margin for England.

In such a scenario, England could vault to second place, while South Africa and New Zealand would tumble to fifth and sixth, respectively. For New Zealand, this would represent an unprecedented low, marking their worst-ever ranking of fifth.

ADVERTISEMENT

This seismic shift in rankings would be historic, as it would be the first time since the rankings’ inception in October 2003 that both South Africa and New Zealand find themselves outside the top four. England, in contrast, would ascend to second place, a ranking they have not enjoyed since February 2021.

The drama doesn’t end there. South Africa faces the risk of sliding down to fifth if they suffer a loss to England by a margin exceeding 15 points. On the flip side, victory for both New Zealand and South Africa would set the stage for a thrilling rematch of the Rugby World Cup 1995 final, with no changes in the rankings.

South Africa’s potential gain is limited, with a maximum increase of 0.46 points if they manage to overcome England, while New Zealand has the opportunity to narrow the gap by earning up to 0.65 points for defeating Los Pumas.

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Singapore SVNS Day 1 - Replay

Fresh Starts | Episode 3 | Cobus Reinach

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 11

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

The Breakfast Show | Episode 7

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Pacific Four Series 2024 | Canada vs USA

Japan Rugby League One | Verblitz v Eagles | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
Jon 11 hours ago
The case for keeping the Melbourne Rebels in Super Rugby Pacific

I have heard it asked if RA is essentially one of the part owners and I suppose therefor should be on the other side of these two parties. If they purchased the rebels and guaranteed them, and are responsible enough they incur Rebels penalties, where is this line drawn? Seems rough to have to pay a penalty for something were your involvement sees you on the side of the conned party, the creditors. If the Rebels directors themselves have given the club their money, 6mil worth right, why aren’t they also listed as sitting with RA and the Tax office? And the legal threat was either way, new Rebels or defunct, I can’t see how RA assume the threat was less likely enough to warrant comment about it in this article. Surely RA ignore that and only worry about whether they can defend it or not, which they have reported as being comfortable with. So in effect wouldn’t it be more accurate to say there is no further legal threat (or worry) in denying the deal. Unless the directors have reneged on that. > Returns of a Japanese team or even Argentinean side, the Jaguares, were said to be on the cards, as were the ideas of standing up brand new teams in Hawaii or even Los Angeles – crazy ideas that seemingly forgot the time zone issues often cited as a turn-off for viewers when the competition contained teams from South Africa. Those timezones are great for SR and are what will probably be needed to unlock its future (cant see it remaining without _atleast _help from Aus), day games here are night games on the West Coast of america, were potential viewers triple, win win. With one of the best and easiest ways to unlock that being to play games or a host a team there. Less good the further across Aus you get though. Jaguares wouldn’t be the same Jaguares, but I still would think it’s better having them than keeping the Rebels. The other options aren’t really realistic 25’ options, no. From reading this authors last article I think if the new board can get the investment they seem to be confident in, you keeping them simply for the amount of money they’ll be investing in the game. Then ditch them later if they’re not good enough without such a high budget. Use them to get Jaguares reintergration stronger, with more key players on board, and have success drive success.

28 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING The All Blacks outplayed the Springboks in the World Cup final The All Blacks outplayed the Springboks
Search