Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

'Instead of being the hunters, Ireland are the hunted and it's different... not many teams cope with it well'

Aki could help give the Lions a physical edge at 12. (Photo by Phil Walter/Getty Images)

Ireland’s underwhelming Guinness Six Nations campaign is putting a spring in the step of the watching Steve Hansen, as he explained in an interview with the New Zealand Herald. 

ADVERTISEMENT

The All Blacks coach, outfoxed by Joe Schmidt when the Irish beat New Zealand in Dublin in November, has been keeping a close eye on the 2019 championship in Europe and has been enthused by Ireland’s run of off-colour performances. 

The defending Six Nations champions, who followed 2018’s Grand Slam with a series win in Australia and then the scalp of the All Blacks, lost to England on the opening day and have since struggled to impress in dour wins over Scotland Italy.

“I said it at the time when we played Ireland that whoever won that game was going to be viewed as the No1 team in the world and everyone is going to chase them,” Hansen said.

“For us that’s something we’ve been used to. We’ve been ranked the No1 team for 112 months now I think but people have seen Ireland as the top dog after they beat us, and that put a massive amount of expectation on the players and coaches.

(Continue reading below…)

Video Spacer

“Instead of being the hunters they are the hunted and it’s different. It’s different when you’re sitting at the top of the tree. It’s a different experience. Not many teams cope with it that well.”

After winning in Dublin, England were touted as the team to go through the tournament unbeaten. However, they were beaten by Wales in round three and it’s Warren Gatland’s team who will now feel the pressure as they go to Scotland on Saturday as table-toppers chasing a first Grand Slam since 2012. 

ADVERTISEMENT

“They’re all capable of knocking off a big team,” Hansen said. “We’ve seen that with Ireland. They were favourites going into the tournament and they’ve been beaten by England. Then all of a sudden England were favourites to win the tournament, now they’ve been beaten.

“France should’ve beaten Wales in the first game so it’s a pretty even contest all round. You’ve got to turn up and play well if you want to be in it.

“It’s different to the Super competition; it’s different to Sanzaar test matches but it’s still really good rugby. There’s been some brutal tests. All of the Home Nations, plus France, and there’s been some improvement in Italy too.”

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

LIVE NOW - Singapore SVNS Day 1

Fresh Starts | Episode 3 | Cobus Reinach

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 11

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

The Breakfast Show | Episode 7

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Pacific Four Series 2024 | Canada vs USA

Japan Rugby League One | Verblitz v Eagles | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
Jon 11 hours ago
The case for keeping the Melbourne Rebels in Super Rugby Pacific

I have heard it asked if RA is essentially one of the part owners and I suppose therefor should be on the other side of these two parties. If they purchased the rebels and guaranteed them, and are responsible enough they incur Rebels penalties, where is this line drawn? Seems rough to have to pay a penalty for something were your involvement sees you on the side of the conned party, the creditors. If the Rebels directors themselves have given the club their money, 6mil worth right, why aren’t they also listed as sitting with RA and the Tax office? And the legal threat was either way, new Rebels or defunct, I can’t see how RA assume the threat was less likely enough to warrant comment about it in this article. Surely RA ignore that and only worry about whether they can defend it or not, which they have reported as being comfortable with. So in effect wouldn’t it be more accurate to say there is no further legal threat (or worry) in denying the deal. Unless the directors have reneged on that. > Returns of a Japanese team or even Argentinean side, the Jaguares, were said to be on the cards, as were the ideas of standing up brand new teams in Hawaii or even Los Angeles – crazy ideas that seemingly forgot the time zone issues often cited as a turn-off for viewers when the competition contained teams from South Africa. Those timezones are great for SR and are what will probably be needed to unlock its future (cant see it remaining without _atleast _help from Aus), day games here are night games on the West Coast of america, were potential viewers triple, win win. With one of the best and easiest ways to unlock that being to play games or a host a team there. Less good the further across Aus you get though. Jaguares wouldn’t be the same Jaguares, but I still would think it’s better having them than keeping the Rebels. The other options aren’t really realistic 25’ options, no. From reading this authors last article I think if the new board can get the investment they seem to be confident in, you keeping them simply for the amount of money they’ll be investing in the game. Then ditch them later if they’re not good enough without such a high budget. Use them to get Jaguares reintergration stronger, with more key players on board, and have success drive success.

27 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE Makazole Mapimpi: 'My life is somewhere I never thought it would be.' Makazole Mapimpi: 'My life is somewhere I never thought it would be.'
Search