Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

Gustard: '(I'm) gutted. I'm disappointed with the referee today'

By Online Editors
The Harlequins coaching staff at Twickenham

Paul Gustard was left “gutted” by his side’s inability to hold on to a healthy second-half lead as Harlequins drew 30-30 with Leicester at Twickenham.

ADVERTISEMENT

In the 12th version of the Premiership’s annual ‘Big Game’, the outcome was the same as the first edition in 2008 as Quins and the Tigers played out a draw.

This time it was the Tigers who cancelled out a 14-point deficit with the game heading into its closing quarter thanks to scores from Jordan Taufua and Telusa Veainu.

But Quins director of rugby Gustard believes that the scoreline was unjust to his side.

Video Spacer

He said: “For me, (I’m) gutted. I’m disappointed with the referee today and it feels more like a loss than getting two points.

“I think we were the most dominant team by far, apart from them getting up 6-3, they weren’t in the lead in the game again.

“It was difficult, obviously, with sinbinning our tighthead prop, we had to move Joe Marler across.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Ultimately, the only way they got back in the game was through their scrum and one lineout maul.

“We give a daft pass, intercept try, seven points. We get bullied at the scrum and they get a lineout maul and then at the end we were down to 14 men with Paul Lasike having to come off to make sure we shored up the scrum and the lineout, and we get exposed in the back-field.”

A tightly-fought first 40 saw the sides separated by a crunching Lasike score at half-time, but it was undoubtedly a game that came alive after the break as both sides slipped off the shackles.

Marcus Smith and Chris Robshaw grabbed a pair of quickfire scores after Kyle Eastmond had levelled things as the Londoners took the initiative in front of a bumper crowd of 75,626 in the capital.

ADVERTISEMENT

And just when the Tigers looked dead and buried, Taufua finished things off from a driving Leicester maul before Will Collier was sent to the bin for the hosts.

Veainu latched on to George Ford’s deft chip to level things, but there was to be no winner.

Tigers head coach Geordan Murphy – try-scorer in the 26-26 draw back in 2008 – heaped praise on his dominant pack for salvaging something.

“We knew that they were on a final warning scrum wise, we thought we had an edge there,” he said.

“We used that to build us a platform and at 30-30 and when they were down to 14 with seven minutes to go, I thought we’d go on and win that game, so it certainly feels like a very strange game.

“We took our opportunities when and where they came, so it was pleasing that we stayed in it and at the end of the day it’s two points.”

Press Association

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Fresh Starts | Episode 1 | Will Skelton

ABBIE WARD: A BUMP IN THE ROAD

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 8

James Cook | The Big Jim Show | Full Episode

New Zealand victorious in TENSE final | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Men's Highlights

New Zealand crowned BACK-TO-BACK champions | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Women's Highlights

Japan Rugby League One | Steelers v Sungoliath | Full Match Replay

Rugby Europe Women's Championship | Netherlands v Spain

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

S
Senzo Cicero 16 hours ago
'If the South Africans are in, they need to be all in'

1. True, if that “free” ticket means access to all but the prized exhibit - EVIP only. SA cannot host semis, even if they’ve earned it (see Sharks vs ASM Clermont Auvergne at… Twickenham Stoop). 2. Why no selective outrage over Lyon doing the exact same thing a week earlier? Out of all the countries France send the most “B teams”, why nobody talking about “disrespect” and “prioritising domestic leagues” and “kicking them out”? 3. Why no mention of the Sharks fielding all of their Springboks for the second rate Challenge cup QF? No commitment? 4. Why no mention of all the SA teams qualifying for respective euro knock out comps in the two seasons they’ve been in it? How many euro teams have qualified for KO’s in their history? Can’t compete? 5. Why no mention of SA teams beating French and English giants La Rochelle and Saracens? How many euro teams have done that in their history? Add no quality? The fact is that SA teams are only in their second season in europe, with no status and a fraction of the resources. Since joining the URC, SA has seen a repatriation of a number of players, and this will only grow once SA start sharing in the profits of competing in these comps, meaning bigger squads with greater depth and quality, meaning they don’t have to prioritise comps as they have to now - they don’t have imports from Pacifica and South America and everywhere else in between like “European” teams have - also less “Saffas” in Prem and T14, that’s what we want right? 'If the South Africans are in, they need to be all in' True, and we have to ensure we give them the same status and resources as we give everyone else to do just that. A small compromise on scheduling will go a long way in avoiding these situations, but guess what, France and England wont compromise on scheduling because they ironically… prioritise their domestic comps, go figure!

20 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING All Black dropped to bench as Crusaders make six starting changes for Force All Black dropped to bench as Crusaders make six starting changes
Search