Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

Group of 10 Wallabies captains have written another letter to Rugby Australia

By AAP
(Photo by Mark Kolbe/Getty Images)

The group of ten Wallabies captains who expressed concern about how the game was being run before Rugby Australia CEO Raelene Castle resigned last month have sent another letter to acting chairman Paul McLean. The approach came after some of the former skippers met with former RA director Peter Wiggs, who resigned from the board last week.

ADVERTISEMENT

The captains are believed to be concerned RA may not push through with commitments made to them by Wiggs. While Rob Clarke was appointed interim CEO last week, it’s believed McLean will continue to represent RA when communicating with the captains.

Meanwhile, Wiggs is set to be replaced on the board by Hamish McLennan, a former Network Ten boss and News Corp senior executive, who might also become the new chairman.

Video Spacer

The Sunwolves want to leave a legacy before bowing out of Super Rugby

Video Spacer

The Sunwolves want to leave a legacy before bowing out of Super Rugby

The Wallabies’ 1991 World Cup-winning captain Nick Farr-Jones, one of the ten disenchanted past captains, admitted he could be interested in taking a seat in the board. “I could be tempted to go on the board,” Farr-Jones told Network Ten.

He described the game as being “rudderless” for some time. “You do need some significant reviews about the brokenness of the game and then you have to have a reset,” he said.

Dealing with the ten captains is among several issues currently confronting RA. For instance, it’s believed that the Western Force must accept new participation conditions if they want to play in a revamped Australian Super Rugby competition provisionally set for July.

Rugby Australia have drawn up five and six-team models for a proposed season to replace the Super Rugby tournament, which was suspended due to the coronavirus pandemic in March. One model has the WA-based Force playing alongside the four current Australian Super Rugby sides and the other has Japan’s Sunwolves joining and being based in either NSW Or Queensland.

ADVERTISEMENT

RA believes a model including the Force would make the tournament a more enticing product for broadcasters. They also need to get the green light from state governments and lock in venues.

The Force, who were cut from Super Rugby by RA after the 2017 season, have been involved in discussions with the national body since the COVID-19 shut down though as of Tuesday the Perth-based club had not received a formal invitation to join the new competition.

Cash-strapped RA would not be drawn on whether they will fund any part of the Force’s potential involvement. “The participation conditions for the Force would be newly constructed as they were not part of the original Super Rugby competition,” an RA spokesperson said.

“One of the immediate priorities is to ascertain the Sunwolves involvement in the competition with the current travel restrictions in place. Once this is known we will be able to confirm the final competition construct, draw and participation conditions.”

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Fresh Starts | Episode 2 | Sam Whitelock

Royal Navy Men v Royal Air Force Men | Full Match Replay

Royal Navy Women v Royal Air Force Women | Full Match Replay

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 9

James Cook | The Big Jim Show | Full Episode

New Zealand victorious in TENSE final | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Men's Highlights

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

F
Flankly 12 hours ago
The AI advantage: How the next two Rugby World Cups will be won

If rugby wants to remain interesting in the AI era then it will need to work on changing the rules. AI will reduce the tactical advantage of smart game plans, will neutralize primary attacking weapons, and will move rugby from a being a game of inches to a game of millimetres. It will be about sheer athleticism and technique,about avoiding mistakes, and about referees. Many fans will find that boring. The answer is to add creative degrees of freedom to the game. The 50-22 is an example. But we can have fun inventing others, like the right to add more players for X minutes per game, or the equivalent of the 2-point conversion in American football, the ability to call a 12-player scrum, etc. Not saying these are great ideas, but making the point that the more of these alternatives you allow, the less AI will be able to lock down high-probability strategies. This is not because AI does not have the compute power, but because it has more choices and has less data, or less-specific data. That will take time and debate, but big, positive and immediate impact could be in the area of ref/TMO assistance. The technology is easily good enough today to detect forward passes, not-straight lineouts, offside at breakdown/scrum/lineout, obstruction, early/late tackles, and a lot of other things. WR should be ultra aggressive in doing this, as it will really help in an area in which the game is really struggling. In the long run there needs to be substantial creativity applied to the rules. Without that AI (along with all of the pro innovations) will turn rugby into a bash fest.

24 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Jean Kleyn's season ending injury could be worse than first thought Jean Kleyn's season ending injury worse than thought
Search