Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

Four England takeaways: From brazen Eddie to 'missing' fans riddle

By Liam Heagney
(Photo by Alex Davidson/The RFU Collection via Getty Images)

Saturday at Twickenham was bonkers. England looked set for a demoralising, depressing margin of defeat against a better, more aligned All Blacks side before a plot twist that even a Hollywood film script would struggle to imagine materialised to provide a fireworks-style denouement.

ADVERTISEMENT

Pity any England fan who quit and headed for the exit after Jordie Barrett dissected the posts with his casual 71st-minute drop goal which stretched the All Blacks lead to 25-6. That appeared to be that for the blunted English attack.

However, sudden momentum swings are a wonderful asset in rugby and the ball-shifting heroics that suddenly ignited were a joy for everyone to watch unless you were a Kiwi left dumbstruck by the callowness of your napping team coming down the finish straight.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

All previous concrete opinions were swashbucklingly tipped on their head – England were no longer as bad as they had looked and the All Blacks were no longer as good as they looked, and the 25-all draw that resulted was essentially in keeping with the inconsistencies of both teams over the course of 2022.

Only time can tell if their respective shortcomings are a positive towards getting things perfect for World Cup 2023 or damaging evidence that they really are short the tools to lift the trophy in Paris.

Brazen Eddie
There was only one way that Eddie Jones was going to play things post-game. Beaming with the catwalk smile of someone who had just walked away from the roulette table having gambled everything in desperation and somehow beaten the house, he insisted that he always believed in his England side and that he had never given up hope that they would come good against the All Blacks. Yeah, right!

“No, no, I thought we played with tremendous spirit in the first half,” he brazenly claimed when asked straight up if he thought the game was gone. “I thought New Zealand were superb in the first half, I can’t recall as New Zealand side playing as well as they did in the first half, aggressive, sharp around the ruck, good attacking kicks and we just had to hand in there.

ADVERTISEMENT

“We hung in there, hung in there, and then start of the second half we were able to put some pressure back on them and the first 20 minutes of the second half I thought we were the dominant team but it didn’t convert to any points. And then all of a sudden someone blows some magic dust and the passes start to click, the lines were a bit sharper.”

That “didn’t convert into any points” was interesting as England were obsessed with kicking penalties to touch rather than taking points. There was one award straight in front of the posts in the vicinity of the ten-metre line around the hour mark, a chance that was well within the compass of Marcus Smith compared to some other penalty kicks that would have been more to the side of the side.

Three points then would have reduced the margin to 9-22 and made it a more manageable two-score game. Instead, it was drilled into the 22 and after a few minutes of faffing about, the chance was lost and with it some valuable time. With hindsight, three points then would have made the winning difference and transformed the whole debate around this England team and not ignited the heated conversation about whether Smith should have kicked the ball dead to finish the game or not.

So inconsistent do England remain, no one can argue with any certainty that they are on an upward trajectory ten months out from the World Cup. As it stands, they are currently at a 50 per cent success rate for 2022 – five wins, five defeats and a draw. Beating South Africa is now a must.

ADVERTISEMENT

The 23-man riddle
England coach Jones was cock-a-hoop about the contribution of his so-called finishers, which was quite a song and dance in sharp contrast to the demoralising conservatism of 13 days earlier when he left unused paid Dave Ribbans and Jack Singleton rooted to the bench in the loss to Argentina.

As someone who constantly preaches how the sport is now a 23-man game, it was a bad mark on his report card. Saturday was the opposite. The alterations commenced with the whole starting front row getting hooked as early as the 53rd minute, and the bench was totally cleared when midfielder Guy Porter, whose step inside was critical to the equalising converted try, was sent on 15 minutes later to play on the wing.

Related

Porter wasn’t alone in helping to turn the seemingly dead and buried contest on its head. Mako Vunipola made seven rousing carries, big man Ribbans exuberantly exhibited deft handling with two tempo-quickening offloads and, of course, there was the marvellous Will Stuart grabbing two tries in seven minutes when he had drawn a blank in his previous 23 appearances. Remarkable efforts in a remarkable denouement.

“For us, we’re building a team that has got to be able to play in a number of different ways and that was the great thing about that last little bit,” chirped Jones, as if the bonkers conclusion was something he had scripted to happen as it did.

“That’s some of the things we have been working on, to play a much more aggressive attacking game and we were able to do that. And just the role of the 23, just so important for us, that the 23 wins the game.

“I thought our finishers came on and really improved the game we wanted to play, and sometimes that happens. Mako came on and ran some really good lines in the centre of the field that enabled us to attack a bit straighter on the outside, so the game changes. It’s a really important game for us that we played with such spirit.”

That still doesn’t explain two weekends ago and Jones’ unsuccessful 21-man approach.

Related

Reprieved Raynal
Referee Mathieu Raynal, an emergency appointment last Tuesday following the unavailability of Nic Berry due to personal reasons, was the recipient of regular groans from the partisan Twickenham crowd and yet, the game balanced itself out for England. Of the 28 penalties awarded, they were evenly shared at 14 apiece.

One moment, though, was intriguing given the controversial anti-time-wasting decision the French official made against Bernard Foley in the September Rugby Championship game that tipped the way of the All Blacks when they were unexpectedly handed possession from which they nabbed the winning score in Melbourne.

Raynal paid a price for his overall TRC performance as the only Autumn Nations Series match he was scheduled to referee this month was this weekend’s Romania-Samoa game in Bucharest – hardly the high-profile gig he has been used to. However, injury to Jaco Peyper left him in charge of Ireland-Fiji last weekend and Berry’s cry-off then handed him the England-All Blacks appointment. A crazy sequence of events after he had been so cold-shouldered.

It was widely debated at the time whether his time-wasting call was something that would be seen more often in the sport, given the general disenchantment of fans with stoppages and slow play, so it was interesting how Raynal penalised New Zealand at a 22-metre lineout four minutes from the interval due to a delay by Codie Taylor throwing in.

It initially threw the hooker as his next effort after England kicked out the free was crooked, but his next hurried-up throw provided the platform for the penalty that the All Blacks stroked over on the blow of half-time for 17-3. The moral of the story? Taylor had learned his too-slow lesson. Well played, Raynal.

Related

The ‘missing’ fans
Jones’ post-game joviality even extended to making a smart remark about a Twickenham attendance that somehow wasn’t at full capacity. The fixture was a massive draw. Unlike last week against Japan, as soon as you walked out of the train station on Saturday you were confronted with a line of ticket touts openly canvassing for business even though there were police close by.

Come the headcount, there were tickets that had gone astray as 81,364 was the official attendance announced in the stadium near the end of the match and the absenteeism was something the coach referenced with tongue in cheek while praising the fans who did turn up.

“The other significant thing was the support from the crowd,” he suggested when analysing the England revival. “The crowd was absolutely fantastic which definitely lifted the players. We are grateful to the 81,641 (sic) that were there. I don’t know what happened to the other 349. They will be kicking themselves and we hope there will be 82,000 there next week, complete, because it is going to be a hell of a game (versus the Springboks).” It sure will.

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 6

Sam Warburton | The Big Jim Show | Full Episode

Japan Rugby League One | Sungoliath v Eagles | Full Match Replay

Japan Rugby League One | Spears v Wild Knights | Full Match Replay

Boks Office | Episode 10 | Six Nations Final Round Review

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | How can New Zealand rugby beat this Ireland team

Beyond 80 | Episode 5

Rugby Europe Men's Championship Final | Georgia v Portugal | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
Jon 7 hours ago
Jake White: Are modern rugby players actually better?

This is the problem with conservative mindsets and phycology, and homogenous sports, everybody wants to be the same, use the i-win template. Athlete wise everyone has to have muscles and work at the gym to make themselves more likely to hold on that one tackle. Do those players even wonder if they are now more likely to be tackled by that player as a result of there “work”? Really though, too many questions, Jake. Is it better Jake? Yes, because you still have that rugby of ole that you talk about. Is it at the highest International level anymore? No, but you go to your club or checkout your representative side and still engage with that ‘beautiful game’. Could you also have a bit of that at the top if coaches encouraged there team to play and incentivized players like Damian McKenzie and Ange Capuozzo? Of course we could. Sadly Rugby doesn’t, or didn’t, really know what direction to go when professionalism came. Things like the state of northern pitches didn’t help. Over the last two or three decades I feel like I’ve been fortunate to have all that Jake wants. There was International quality Super Rugby to adore, then the next level below I could watch club mates, pulling 9 to 5s, take on the countries best in representative rugby. Rugby played with flair and not too much riding on the consequences. It was beautiful. That largely still exists today, but with the world of rugby not quite getting things right, the picture is now being painted in NZ that that level of rugby is not required in the “pathway” to Super Rugby or All Black rugby. You might wonder if NZR is right and the pathway shouldn’t include the ‘amateur’, but let me tell you, even though the NPC might be made up of people still having to pull 9-5s, we know these people still have dreams to get out of that, and aren’t likely to give them. They will be lost. That will put a real strain on the concept of whether “visceral thrill, derring-do and joyful abandon” type rugby will remain under the professional level here in NZ. I think at some point that can be eroded as well. If only wanting the best athlete’s at the top level wasn’t enough to lose that, shutting off the next group, or level, or rugby players from easy access to express and showcase themselves certainly will. That all comes back around to the same question of professionalism in rugby and whether it got things right, and rugby is better now. Maybe the answer is turning into a “no”?

35 Go to comments
j
john 9 hours ago
Will the Crusaders' decline spark a slow death for New Zealand rugby?

But here in Australia we were told Penney was another gun kiwi coach, for the Tahs…….and yet again it turned out the kiwi coach was completely useless. Another con job on Australian rugby. As was Robbie Deans, as was Dave Rennie. Both coaches dumped from NZ and promoted to Australia as our saviour. And the Tahs lap them up knowing they are second rate and knowing that under pressure when their short comings are exposed in Australia as well, that they will fall in below the largest most powerful province and choose second rate Tah players to save their jobs. As they do and exactly as Joe Schmidt will do. Gauranteed. Schmidt was dumped by NZ too. That’s why he went overseas. That why kiwi coaches take jobs in Australia, to try and prove they are not as bad as NZ thought they were. Then when they get found out they try and ingratiate themselves to NZ again by dragging Australian teams down with ridiculous selections and game plans. NZ rugby’s biggest problem is that it can’t yet transition from MCaw Cheatism. They just don’t know how to try and win on your merits. It is still always a contest to see how much cheating you can get away with. Without a cheating genius like McCaw, they are struggling. This I think is why my wise old mate in NZ thinks Robertson will struggle. The Crusaders are the nursery of McCaw Cheatism. Sean Fitzpatrick was probably the father of it. Robertson doesn’t know anything else but other countries have worked it out.

36 Go to comments
A
Adrian 11 hours ago
Will the Crusaders' decline spark a slow death for New Zealand rugby?

Thanks Nick The loss of players to OS, injury and retirement is certainly not helping the Crusaders. Ditto the coach. IMO Penny is there to hold the fort and cop the flak until new players and a new coach come through,…and that's understood and accepted by Penny and the Crusaders hierarchy. I think though that what is happening with the Crusaders is an indicator of what is happening with the other NZ SRP teams…..and the other SRP teams for that matter. Not enough money. The money has come via the SR competition and it’s not there anymore. It's in France, Japan and England. Unless or until something is done to make SR more SELLABLE to the NZ/Australia Rugby market AND the world rugby market the $s to keep both the very best players and the next rung down won't be there. They will play away from NZ more and more. I think though that NZ will continue to produce the players and the coaches of sufficient strength for NZ to have the capacity to stay at the top. Whether they do stay at the top as an international team will depend upon whether the money flowing to SRP is somehow restored, or NZ teams play in the Japan comp, or NZ opts to pick from anywhere. As a follower of many sports I’d have to say that the organisation and promotion of Super Rugby has been for the last 20 years closest to the worst I’ve ever seen. This hasn't necessarily been caused by NZ, but it’s happened. Perhaps it can be fixed, perhaps not. The Crusaders are I think a symptom of this, not the cause

36 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE Andy Christie: 'Diversity breeds strength in a group rather than weakness' Andy Christie: 'Diversity breeds strength in a group rather than weakness'
Search