Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

'For us to aim to beat sides like Scotland would be a misinterpretation of what we are trying to do'

(Photo by Paolo Bruno/Getty Images)

Italy interim head coach Franco Smith does not expect Wales to be nursing a Warren Gatland hangover for their Guinness Six Nations clash.

ADVERTISEMENT

Italy face the defending Grand Slam champions in the opening fixture of the tournament on February 1.

Gatland called time on his 12-year tenure with Wales after the World Cup, leading to a new era under Wayne Pivac.

But, Smith, who will take charge of Italy for the first time following his appointment last November, expects Wales will be determined to bounce back from their World Cup semi-final defeat to South Africa.

“There will be bumps in the road (for Wales), but I don’t think it is ever easy to play them at the Millennium Stadium,” said Smith.

Continue reading below…

WATCH: Andy Goode and Brendan Venter didn’t hold back on this weeks pod as they discussed Saracens and the salary cap scandal.

Video Spacer

“It is true that there is change, but we also have change, and after their performance in the semi-final it is going to be a proud team running out there for the first game of the Six Nations.

ADVERTISEMENT

“We expect them to be as tough as ever.”

Former South Africa international Smith replaced Conor O’Shea, who oversaw three successive Six Nations’ losing whitewashes during his time in charge.

Italy’s last victory in the tournament was a 22-19 away win over Scotland in 2015.

“We want to find our DNA and play to our strengths,” added Smith, who made nine appearances for the Springboks between 1996 and 1999.

“There has been a lot of good work done through the Conor O’Shea era that we can just bounce on.

ADVERTISEMENT

“For us to aim to beat sides like Scotland would be a misinterpretation of what we are trying to do. We want to be at our best as quickly as possible.”

Press Association

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

The Antoine Dupont Interview

Ireland v New Zealand | Singapore Men's HSBC SVNS Final Highlights

New Zealand v Australia | Singapore Women's HSBC SVNS Final Highlights

Inter Services Championships | Royal Army Men v Royal Navy Men | Full Match Replay

Fresh Starts | Episode 3 | Cobus Reinach

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 11

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

B
Bull Shark 4 hours ago
Speeded-up Super Rugby Pacific provides blueprint for wider game

I’m all for speeding up the game. But can we be certain that the slowness of the game contributed to fans walking out? I’m not so sure. Super rugby largely suffered from most fans only being able to, really, follow the games played in their own time zone. So at least a third of the fan base wasn’t engaged at any point in time. As a Saffer following SA teams in the URC - I now watch virtually every European game played on the weekend. In SR, I wouldn’t be bothered to follow the games being played on the other side of the world, at weird hours, if my team wasn’t playing. I now follow the whole tournament and not just the games in my time zone. Second, with New Zealand teams always winning. It’s like formula one. When one team dominates, people lose interest. After COVID, with SA leaving and Australia dipping in form, SR became an even greater one horse race. Thats why I think Japan’s league needs to get in the mix. The international flavor of those teams could make for a great spectacle. But surely if we believe that shaving seconds off lost time events in rugby is going to draw fans back, we should be shown some figures that supports this idea before we draw any major conclusions. Where are the stats that shows these changes have made that sort of impact? We’ve measured down to the average no. Of seconds per game. Where the measurement of the impact on the fanbase? Does a rugby “fan” who lost interest because of ball in play time suddenly have a revived interest because we’ve saved or brought back into play a matter of seconds or a few minutes each game? I doubt it. I don’t thinks it’s even a noticeable difference to be impactful. The 20 min red card idea. Agreed. Let’s give it a go. But I think it’s fairer that the player sent off is substituted and plays no further part in the game as a consequence.

6 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE How Gonzalo Quesada is driving the Azzurri revolution How Gonzalo Quesada is driving the Azzurri revolution
Search