Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

'For a prop, he's got enormous acceleration, he's got power. He used to play No.8 and wing'

By Nick Heath

As Saturday afternoon in Cardiff approaches, Eddie Jones has admitted he is “massively excited” as the only two unbeaten sides in the 2019 Guinness 6 Nations Championship go head to head.

ADVERTISEMENT

Jones has made just two changes to the side that beat France following injuries to Mako Vunipola and Chris Ashton. One of those sees Ben Moon starting at loosehead prop with Ellis Genge down as one of Jones’ finishers.

“We think that Ben is best starting and Ellis is best finishing for us. That suits their skill sets. Ben’s more of a defensive player whereas Genge is more of an attacking player,” Jones explained “He could end up being potentially one of the best ball carriers in the front row in the world. So, he’s got a lot of potential but Moon’s a tough, strong player so that combination will work well for us.”

On Genge, Jones continued, “For a prop, he’s got enormous acceleration, he’s got power. He used to play No.8 and wing, there aren’t too many props in the world that can run like that and he’s also got a good sense of attack.”

Video Spacer

England’s midfield remains the same with Tuilagi alongside Slade, continuing their development as a centre pairing which Jones appreciates.

He said, “It’s good to have that consistency. We’ve been lucky to be able to pick a settled 9-10-12-13 but we’ve got Benny Te’o back now fit. He probably would have played in the first 6 Nations game so now that he’s fit, he’s going to challenge those two guys.”

With news of Manu Tuilagi’s departure from Leicester Tigers to Racing 92 breaking on RugbyPass, Jones was asked if the Samoan-born centre had consulted him over the move.

ADVERTISEMENT

Jones replied, “The only thing I’m concerned about is Saturday’s game so that’s what I’m here to talk about.”

Having declared that the media have been hyping Wales as the “greatest team ever”, Jones was in typically devious form but when asked about Warren Gatland, a man it’s rumoured could be in line to take over from Jones after the Rugby World Cup, the England head coach was more considered.

Ellis Genge at Pennyhill

Jones said, “We’ve coached against each other for a number of years. I respect his coaching ability, he’s got great results. He’s probably been the most influential coach in European rugby over the last fifteen years. His record’s second to none, he’s done a great job with the Lions. I enjoy the challenge of coaching against his teams.”

ADVERTISEMENT

So will the tag of ‘Gatland’s last stand against England’ motivate Wales’ players to find an extra level against England? Jones said, “That can work in two ways. That can either be a burden or it can be an extra motivation. For us it’s our next game so it’s our most important game.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 11

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Pacific Four Series 2024 | Canada vs USA

Japan Rugby League One | Verblitz v Eagles | Full Match Replay

Fresh Starts | Episode 2 | Sam Whitelock

Royal Navy Men v Royal Air Force Men | Full Match Replay

Royal Navy Women v Royal Air Force Women | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
Jon 8 hours ago
The case for keeping the Melbourne Rebels in Super Rugby Pacific

I have heard it asked if RA is essentially one of the part owners and I suppose therefor should be on the other side of these two parties. If they purchased the rebels and guaranteed them, and are responsible enough they incur Rebels penalties, where is this line drawn? Seems rough to have to pay a penalty for something were your involvement sees you on the side of the conned party, the creditors. If the Rebels directors themselves have given the club their money, 6mil worth right, why aren’t they also listed as sitting with RA and the Tax office? And the legal threat was either way, new Rebels or defunct, I can’t see how RA assume the threat was less likely enough to warrant comment about it in this article. Surely RA ignore that and only worry about whether they can defend it or not, which they have reported as being comfortable with. So in effect wouldn’t it be more accurate to say there is no further legal threat (or worry) in denying the deal. Unless the directors have reneged on that. > Returns of a Japanese team or even Argentinean side, the Jaguares, were said to be on the cards, as were the ideas of standing up brand new teams in Hawaii or even Los Angeles – crazy ideas that seemingly forgot the time zone issues often cited as a turn-off for viewers when the competition contained teams from South Africa. Those timezones are great for SR and are what will probably be needed to unlock its future (cant see it remaining without _atleast _help from Aus), day games here are night games on the West Coast of america, were potential viewers triple, win win. With one of the best and easiest ways to unlock that being to play games or a host a team there. Less good the further across Aus you get though. Jaguares wouldn’t be the same Jaguares, but I still would think it’s better having them than keeping the Rebels. The other options aren’t really realistic 25’ options, no. From reading this authors last article I think if the new board can get the investment they seem to be confident in, you keeping them simply for the amount of money they’ll be investing in the game. Then ditch them later if they’re not good enough without such a high budget. Use them to get Jaguares reintergration stronger, with more key players on board, and have success drive success.

24 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE The era-defining moment that set Leinster on the road to success The era-defining moment that set Leinster on the road to success
Search