Northern | US

Fiji 7's coach lays out crucial changes needed to keep team competing for future honours

Fiji 7's team with Hong Kong Sevens trophy. (Photo by Ivan Shum - Clicks Images/Getty Images)
Comments
Comment

Head coach Gareth Baber, who has guided Fiji to within three points of HSBC World Sevens Series leaders USA despite injury disruptions, is warning that future success will need better systems to be introduced by the Fijian Rugby Union to help the reigning Olympic champions.

ADVERTISEMENT

Fiji have two more Series events in London and Paris to try and finish top a year ahead of their 2020 Olympic title defence in Japan, however Baber wants to see significant changes to ensure the conveyor belt of outstanding talent continues to bolster his squad.

Baber set out his stance in the Fiji Rugby Union Annual report which showed a net income of $569,343 in 2018, up more than 49 per cent from $281,888 the previous year, it was announced at the Union’s AGM. Chief executive officer John O’Connor revealed the income growth was down to increased sponsorship and cost control measures. According the FRU 2018 annual report, the income stood at $18,122,540, while expenditure was $17,553,197.

Baber believes the FRU should, in the short term, address issues such as a consistent training ven­ue for the national team, financial security, player retention, welfare support, player education, quality staff/personnel. Baber is adamant this would reduce “distractions” during the Series and sees an improvement in “centralised and controlled management” as vital if the development of the sevens game is not to be hampered.

He wrote: “At present the system very much resembles that which has been in existence for a number of decades (and granted it has been successful). Yet the competitive environment has changed. The game has shifted away from the “rugby players” towards a hybrid version of the individual, the rugby “athlete”. The game itself has changed and World Rugby continues to move on a path which is driven by a desire to produce a product which looks very different to the game in Fiji. Based on our resources, we need to think creatively about this and how we can make it a reality. We must look to skill and expertise on the Island. This can only be done through the leadership of the Fiji Rugby (Union).

“This requires an effort on be­half of FRU to build processes which create these learning opportunities such as coaching days, referee days, tournament review on the islands, domestic 7s series etc…”

Get the RugbyPass App 📱

Follow the biggest matches with live scores, line-ups, news and analysis, all in the RugbyPass App.

Download Here
On Apple IOS, Android, and Tablet.
ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

P
Phantom 1 hour ago
Nations Championship: 'The data shows the north has finally caught up with the south'

Fact: the gap between the North and the South has narrowed considerably - that I get. However, determining that only selecting only Home grown players or playing in the home country is is the optimal strategy is a bit of a toss up and highly reliant on the economies of the home union. I do understand that England and to a lesser degree Ireland selects home based only. The top 14 is a massive threat to their domestic product. France would probably not be affected (the money is at home). Fiji, Argentina, Samoa, Italy and you could even argue Scotland have only benefitted from this. Their players either go overseas to learn at higher levels (Fiji, Samoa, Argentina) or players coming into their leagues to strengthen the home product and their National teams (Scotland, Italy, Japan).

South Africa used to limit its selection to the home based players, but the reality of a weak currency vs what players could earn oversees meant that you lost access to your best players at some stage of their careers, with very few exceptions. Kolbe left SA as he was considered too small for International Rugby (yes coaches/selectors view), but ironically in France he forced selectors to notice his endeavors and select him. He is only reaching 50 caps now despite being north of 30 - granted rotation and the odd injury also played a role, but for the most part it is having debuted or becoming a regular so late.



...

18 Go to comments
Close Panel
Close Panel

Edition & Time Zone

{{current.name}}
Set time zone automatically
{{selectedTimezoneTitle}} (auto)
Choose a different time zone
Close Panel

Editions

Close Panel

Change Time Zone

Close
ADVERTISEMENT
Copied to clipboard

Share Article close