Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

Do these All Blacks have the ruthless final quarter in them?

By Hamish Bidwell
(Photo by Andrew Cornaga / www.photosport.nz)

Where are you at with these All Blacks?

Take away national pride and your basic hopes and aspirations for the side. When you see these players – as individuals and as a collective – do you feel like you’re looking at one of the great All Black teams?

ADVERTISEMENT

We don’t really do works in progress here and rightly so. We expect excellence and, frankly, history has largely shown that we’re entitled to demand that.

I’m not an Ian Foster enthusiast. I’ve never supported his ascension from assistant coach to head coach and I was appalled when New Zealand Rugby (NZR) appointed him.

Video Spacer

Whitelock talks to media about penalties in Bledisloe I

Video Spacer

Whitelock talks to media about penalties in Bledisloe I

Rightly or wrongly, that probably means I’m looking for fault more often than not. That I’m looking for signs that the All Blacks aren’t making progress under his stewardship and consequently not giving Foster and the team the credit they deserve.

I was underwhelmed by Saturday’s 33-25 win over Australia at Eden Park. I’m not sure the Wallabies are any good and, at 33-8, it certainly didn’t look like it.

Come full time, though, there wasn’t a lot between the teams.

So, honestly, is that because the Wallabies are in fact an elite side? Or was the final score more of a reflection of the All Blacks’ inadequacies?

I’ve already flagged my potential bias here, so let’s eliminate Foster. Let’s look at the men in the black jumpers and wonder aloud about them.

ADVERTISEMENT

Are you convinced that Damian McKenzie is a test-quality fullback? Outstanding Super Rugby player, obviously, but does he instill you with confidence at this level?

What about Sevu Reece on the right wing?

Anton Lienert-Brown is an admirable player and person and a genuine leader within the All Blacks environment, so he’s going to play 12 or 13 whenever fit. This week it was centre and, while Lienert-Brown is industrious and dependable, I’m pretty sure I’ve seen better 13s in my time.

I like David Havili and would love to see him do well, but Saturday wasn’t his best night. At this early stage of his All Blacks career, the jury is still out.

ADVERTISEMENT

Rieko Ioane was good against Australia and I prefer him on the wing.

Richie Mo’unga showed us glimpses of his undoubted ability, but we’re still yet to see him regularly stamp his authority on test rugby. Hopefully he’s given an extended run at first five-eighth and is able to fully show his wares.

Aaron Smith is an all-time great, so no dramas there.

I’m not sure Ardie Savea is a test No.8. Just as I feel Dalton Papalii is only a stop-gap No.7.

As for Akira Ioane, I’m not sure he’d be in my team at all.

Sam Whitelock and Brodie Retallick are two of the best locks we’ve ever seen and then there’s the front row.

Codie Taylor is world class, it’s too soon to judge George Bower and Nepo Laulala is a proven performer.

There’s long been a ruthless efficiency about All Black teams. How many times have we seen them put 20 or 30 points on teams in the final quarter of tests? Opponents might be able to hang in there for an hour, but they eventually succumb to the intensity and speed of New Zealand’s play.

I’m not convinced Ian Foster’s All Blacks have that in them. I’m not sure teams fear them or that these All Blacks have the accuracy and discipline to dominate the way so many previous sides have.

Is that them or is that him? Do we lack outstanding players or are they not getting outstanding coaching?

Foster’s unfortunate in the sense that his appointment was not universally popular. And, as we go along, even those who were in favour of him succeeding Steve Hansen – or at least those who were happy to see how things would go – are surely beginning to wonder if it was the right decision.

To put it bluntly, none of the potential doubts about Foster are being erased by the quality and cohesion of the team’s performances.

Again, though, is that down to him and his coaching team or the crop of players we possess?

Either way, I’m not hugely convinced by this All Blacks team and I suspect I’m not alone there.

What are the chances they beat Australia by 30 points this weekend? Let’s say 46-16 or something in that ballpark.

I’d wager that’s a fair reflection of the two teams’ ability and, on that score, I sympathise with Foster. When the team plays well – it’s as we all expected – and when they’re bad, it’s his fault.

Actually, this is all on NZR and the more these All Blacks struggle to put away mediocre opponents, the more the governing body ought to be criticised for promoting a guy above his station.

Or am I barking up the wrong tree?

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 6

Sam Warburton | The Big Jim Show | Full Episode

Japan Rugby League One | Sungoliath v Eagles | Full Match Replay

Japan Rugby League One | Spears v Wild Knights | Full Match Replay

Boks Office | Episode 10 | Six Nations Final Round Review

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | How can New Zealand rugby beat this Ireland team

Beyond 80 | Episode 5

Rugby Europe Men's Championship Final | Georgia v Portugal | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
Jon 8 hours ago
Jake White: Are modern rugby players actually better?

This is the problem with conservative mindsets and phycology, and homogenous sports, everybody wants to be the same, use the i-win template. Athlete wise everyone has to have muscles and work at the gym to make themselves more likely to hold on that one tackle. Do those players even wonder if they are now more likely to be tackled by that player as a result of there “work”? Really though, too many questions, Jake. Is it better Jake? Yes, because you still have that rugby of ole that you talk about. Is it at the highest International level anymore? No, but you go to your club or checkout your representative side and still engage with that ‘beautiful game’. Could you also have a bit of that at the top if coaches encouraged there team to play and incentivized players like Damian McKenzie and Ange Capuozzo? Of course we could. Sadly Rugby doesn’t, or didn’t, really know what direction to go when professionalism came. Things like the state of northern pitches didn’t help. Over the last two or three decades I feel like I’ve been fortunate to have all that Jake wants. There was International quality Super Rugby to adore, then the next level below I could watch club mates, pulling 9 to 5s, take on the countries best in representative rugby. Rugby played with flair and not too much riding on the consequences. It was beautiful. That largely still exists today, but with the world of rugby not quite getting things right, the picture is now being painted in NZ that that level of rugby is not required in the “pathway” to Super Rugby or All Black rugby. You might wonder if NZR is right and the pathway shouldn’t include the ‘amateur’, but let me tell you, even though the NPC might be made up of people still having to pull 9-5s, we know these people still have dreams to get out of that, and aren’t likely to give them. They will be lost. That will put a real strain on the concept of whether “visceral thrill, derring-do and joyful abandon” type rugby will remain under the professional level here in NZ. I think at some point that can be eroded as well. If only wanting the best athlete’s at the top level wasn’t enough to lose that, shutting off the next group, or level, or rugby players from easy access to express and showcase themselves certainly will. That all comes back around to the same question of professionalism in rugby and whether it got things right, and rugby is better now. Maybe the answer is turning into a “no”?

35 Go to comments
j
john 11 hours ago
Will the Crusaders' decline spark a slow death for New Zealand rugby?

But here in Australia we were told Penney was another gun kiwi coach, for the Tahs…….and yet again it turned out the kiwi coach was completely useless. Another con job on Australian rugby. As was Robbie Deans, as was Dave Rennie. Both coaches dumped from NZ and promoted to Australia as our saviour. And the Tahs lap them up knowing they are second rate and knowing that under pressure when their short comings are exposed in Australia as well, that they will fall in below the largest most powerful province and choose second rate Tah players to save their jobs. As they do and exactly as Joe Schmidt will do. Gauranteed. Schmidt was dumped by NZ too. That’s why he went overseas. That why kiwi coaches take jobs in Australia, to try and prove they are not as bad as NZ thought they were. Then when they get found out they try and ingratiate themselves to NZ again by dragging Australian teams down with ridiculous selections and game plans. NZ rugby’s biggest problem is that it can’t yet transition from MCaw Cheatism. They just don’t know how to try and win on your merits. It is still always a contest to see how much cheating you can get away with. Without a cheating genius like McCaw, they are struggling. This I think is why my wise old mate in NZ thinks Robertson will struggle. The Crusaders are the nursery of McCaw Cheatism. Sean Fitzpatrick was probably the father of it. Robertson doesn’t know anything else but other countries have worked it out.

44 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING 'It's an All Black discussion': The pair of young Hurricanes tipped for black jerseys The pair of young Hurricanes tipped for black jerseys
Search