Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

'Disgusting' - Aussie prop could face six month ban for biting incident

By Ian Cameron
Liz Patu

Australian Rugby has cited a Queensland womens player for biting.

Queensland prop Liz Patu is due to appear before an independent disciplinary panel tomorrow (4 March) at the Queensland Rugby Union (QRU). Patu was cited by independent citing commissioner Wayne Erickson for an alleged incident of biting, contrary to Law 9.12.

ADVERTISEMENT

Law 9.12 states: ‘A player must not physically or verbally abuse anyone. Physical abuse includes, but is not limited to, biting, punching, contact with the eye or eye area, striking with any part of the arm (including stiff-arm tackles), shoulder, head or knee(s), stamping, trampling, tripping or kicking.’

If found guilty, Patu could face a lengthy ban. The lower entry point ban for such an offence is set out at 12 weeks, but she could be banned for up to six months.

Continue reading below…

Video Spacer

The incident occurred in the 70th minute of the match between Queensland Women and Rugby WA Women on Saturday 2 March 2019 at Suncorp Stadium in Brisbane. Footage has arisen of the incident, and it appears to be pretty clear cut evidence that Patu has a case to answer.

Commentating on the match, former Wallaby Drew Mitchell said: “I think we will hear more and we should. That is disgusting and it’s not a part of our game, especially from an Australian representative and a captain at that.”

The alleged victim of the bite, Rebecca Clough informed referee Lara West of what had happened: “Ref, I’m just saying, I’ve been bitten.”

West spoke with Queensland captain Kiri Lingman: “She showed me her arm with bite marks,” West said. “I didn’t see it, so I can’t call it. If I do see it, that person is gone. Tell them now.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Patu’s hearing will take place at 6pm AEST at the QRU offices, Ballymore.

In 2017 Patu was selected to represent Australia at the International Women’s Rugby Series in New Zealand and the Women’s Rugby World Cup.

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

LIVE NOW - Singapore SVNS Day 1

Fresh Starts | Episode 3 | Cobus Reinach

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 11

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

The Breakfast Show | Episode 7

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Pacific Four Series 2024 | Canada vs USA

Japan Rugby League One | Verblitz v Eagles | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
Jon 10 hours ago
The case for keeping the Melbourne Rebels in Super Rugby Pacific

I have heard it asked if RA is essentially one of the part owners and I suppose therefor should be on the other side of these two parties. If they purchased the rebels and guaranteed them, and are responsible enough they incur Rebels penalties, where is this line drawn? Seems rough to have to pay a penalty for something were your involvement sees you on the side of the conned party, the creditors. If the Rebels directors themselves have given the club their money, 6mil worth right, why aren’t they also listed as sitting with RA and the Tax office? And the legal threat was either way, new Rebels or defunct, I can’t see how RA assume the threat was less likely enough to warrant comment about it in this article. Surely RA ignore that and only worry about whether they can defend it or not, which they have reported as being comfortable with. So in effect wouldn’t it be more accurate to say there is no further legal threat (or worry) in denying the deal. Unless the directors have reneged on that. > Returns of a Japanese team or even Argentinean side, the Jaguares, were said to be on the cards, as were the ideas of standing up brand new teams in Hawaii or even Los Angeles – crazy ideas that seemingly forgot the time zone issues often cited as a turn-off for viewers when the competition contained teams from South Africa. Those timezones are great for SR and are what will probably be needed to unlock its future (cant see it remaining without _atleast _help from Aus), day games here are night games on the West Coast of america, were potential viewers triple, win win. With one of the best and easiest ways to unlock that being to play games or a host a team there. Less good the further across Aus you get though. Jaguares wouldn’t be the same Jaguares, but I still would think it’s better having them than keeping the Rebels. The other options aren’t really realistic 25’ options, no. From reading this authors last article I think if the new board can get the investment they seem to be confident in, you keeping them simply for the amount of money they’ll be investing in the game. Then ditch them later if they’re not good enough without such a high budget. Use them to get Jaguares reintergration stronger, with more key players on board, and have success drive success.

24 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE Makazole Mapimpi: 'My life is somewhere I never thought it would be.' Makazole Mapimpi: 'My life is somewhere I never thought it would be.'
Search