Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

Could 'The Rock' be the answer for a Pacific Super Rugby team?

Could Dwayne 'The Rock' Johnson be the answer to having a Pacific-based Rugby team?

Could US-based actor and personality Dwayne ‘The Rock’ Johnson be the answer for a Pacific-based rugby team?

ADVERTISEMENT

That is the theory of Future of Super Rugby, who have launched a campaign calling on fans to reach out to the superstar to listen to the proposal. They believe he has the “mana” required to change the face of professional rugby and create a legacy for rugby in the Pacific region.

As the most recognisable Pacific-icon in the world, he is proud of his Pasifika roots and has long been a fan of the world champion All Blacks and has respect for the game of rugby.

His profile would help rugby achieve popularity in the world’s biggest sports market, the United States.

The proposers believe that a Johnson-owned franchise would be able to “blitz” the required US$12m in funding required to run a team, without ‘a cent from his own money’.

A combination of estimated gate takings ($4m), World Rugby grants ($1.5m) and a slice of broadcast revenue ($6.5m) could achieve the required amount without taking into consideration potential commercial revenue from merchandising agreements and potential team sponsors.

With over 116 million Instagram followers, his social media account alone is more than the population of New Zealand, Australia and South Africa combined; or alternatively England, Ireland, Scotland and Wales combined, making his involvement an attractive proposition to promote a team.

ADVERTISEMENT

With ties to current players like All Black Sonny Bill Williams, it would be easy to see how playing for Johnson’s team could attract some high-profile names. Established players internationals looking to represent their Pacific heritage may find joining the team a worthy cause, much like the Tongan national rugby league team has the last 12 months.

A Johnson-led ownership group could put the necessary governance structures in place to ensure the future of the franchise, which would go a long way to providing SANZAAR the necessary assurances to grant a license.

 

https://www.facebook.com/futureofsuperrugby/videos/917157438493781/

In other news:

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 11

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Pacific Four Series 2024 | Canada vs USA

Japan Rugby League One | Verblitz v Eagles | Full Match Replay

Fresh Starts | Episode 2 | Sam Whitelock

Royal Navy Men v Royal Air Force Men | Full Match Replay

Royal Navy Women v Royal Air Force Women | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
Jon 5 hours ago
The case for keeping the Melbourne Rebels in Super Rugby Pacific

I have heard it asked if RA is essentially one of the part owners and I suppose therefor should be on the other side of these two parties. If they purchased the rebels and guaranteed them, and are responsible enough they incur Rebels penalties, where is this line drawn? Seems rough to have to pay a penalty for something were your involvement sees you on the side of the conned party, the creditors. If the Rebels directors themselves have given the club their money, 6mil worth right, why aren’t they also listed as sitting with RA and the Tax office? And the legal threat was either way, new Rebels or defunct, I can’t see how RA assume the threat was less likely enough to warrant comment about it in this article. Surely RA ignore that and only worry about whether they can defend it or not, which they have reported as being comfortable with. So in effect wouldn’t it be more accurate to say there is no further legal threat (or worry) in denying the deal. Unless the directors have reneged on that. > Returns of a Japanese team or even Argentinean side, the Jaguares, were said to be on the cards, as were the ideas of standing up brand new teams in Hawaii or even Los Angeles – crazy ideas that seemingly forgot the time zone issues often cited as a turn-off for viewers when the competition contained teams from South Africa. Those timezones are great for SR and are what will probably be needed to unlock its future (cant see it remaining without _atleast _help from Aus), day games here are night games on the West Coast of america, were potential viewers triple, win win. With one of the best and easiest ways to unlock that being to play games or a host a team there. Less good the further across Aus you get though. Jaguares wouldn’t be the same Jaguares, but I still would think it’s better having them than keeping the Rebels. The other options aren’t really realistic 25’ options, no. From reading this authors last article I think if the new board can get the investment they seem to be confident in, you keeping them simply for the amount of money they’ll be investing in the game. Then ditch them later if they’re not good enough without such a high budget. Use them to get Jaguares reintergration stronger, with more key players on board, and have success drive success.

16 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Ex-Ireland wing brands Six Nations champs 'not that good an Irish side' Ex-Ireland wing brands Six Nations champs 'not that good'
Search