Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

Colin Cooper on whether Damian McKenzie will keep playing fullback after Chiefs emphatic win

Damian McKenzie of Chiefs against the Bulls. (Photo by Lee Warren/Gallo Images/Getty Images)

The Chiefs have won their first game of the season with an emphatic 56-20 win over the Bulls, their first in Pretoria since 2001 and their largest victory over the South African franchise.

ADVERTISEMENT

“The expectation back home at the Chiefs is, you should be winning every game and we haven’t had a win,” Chiefs head coach Colin Cooper explained post-match.

“I guess when the team puts it together like we did today, it explains why those expectations are very high on the Chiefs.

“Led by Brodie they just played so well. Things stuck, we got offloads away and sped the game up.

Crucial to the Chiefs first win of the season was fullback Damian McKenzie, who had another stellar performance in the 15 jersey, lodging three try assists and scoring a personal tally of 21 points in the win.

https://twitter.com/Buz_White/status/1109468855812964352

Cooper reiterated that McKenzie’s versatility is an asset for the Chiefs and that the All Black will play wherever best suits the needs of the team.

“Damian plays both, 15 and 10, and the Chiefs will use him where we think he fits with us. He could be moved back to 10 or could stay at fullback so we will make that decision on who we play and how the form is of our other 10’s.

ADVERTISEMENT

After starting the season 0-4, the Chiefs fought hard for a 23-23 draw against the Hurricanes last week which Cooper says has built belief within the squad.

“We’ve had a number of players unavailable, injuries and lost a lot of experience from last year. It takes time, it’s a pretty unforgiving stage, Super Rugby.

“Last week we got a lot of belief.”

Captain Brodie Retallick felt that the tour to South Africa has come at the right time, allowing the team to bond together and rectify some of the issues they have struggled with.

“I felt like the last couple of weeks we have been improving, coming off the draw last week is a good time to come away and connect as a team. It gave us an opportunity to sort some of the smaller stuff out that we have been missing,” Retallick said.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I’ve played here before and it’s very tough. To get a win like that and play some exciting rugby, see the boys smiling and having fun, it’s hugely satisfying.”

The seven tries to two victory on the road could be the turning point for the Chiefs season, highlighting the potential within the team.

Bulls coach after loss to Chiefs:

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 11

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Pacific Four Series 2024 | Canada vs USA

Japan Rugby League One | Verblitz v Eagles | Full Match Replay

Fresh Starts | Episode 2 | Sam Whitelock

Royal Navy Men v Royal Air Force Men | Full Match Replay

Royal Navy Women v Royal Air Force Women | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
Jon 4 hours ago
The case for keeping the Melbourne Rebels in Super Rugby Pacific

I have heard it asked if RA is essentially one of the part owners and I suppose therefor should be on the other side of these two parties. If they purchased the rebels and guaranteed them, and are responsible enough they incur Rebels penalties, where is this line drawn? Seems rough to have to pay a penalty for something were your involvement sees you on the side of the conned party, the creditors. If the Rebels directors themselves have given the club their money, 6mil worth right, why aren’t they also listed as sitting with RA and the Tax office? And the legal threat was either way, new Rebels or defunct, I can’t see how RA assume the threat was less likely enough to warrant comment about it in this article. Surely RA ignore that and only worry about whether they can defend it or not, which they have reported as being comfortable with. So in effect wouldn’t it be more accurate to say there is no further legal threat (or worry) in denying the deal. Unless the directors have reneged on that. > Returns of a Japanese team or even Argentinean side, the Jaguares, were said to be on the cards, as were the ideas of standing up brand new teams in Hawaii or even Los Angeles – crazy ideas that seemingly forgot the time zone issues often cited as a turn-off for viewers when the competition contained teams from South Africa. Those timezones are great for SR and are what will probably be needed to unlock its future (cant see it remaining without _atleast _help from Aus), day games here are night games on the West Coast of america, were potential viewers triple, win win. With one of the best and easiest ways to unlock that being to play games or a host a team there. Less good the further across Aus you get though. Jaguares wouldn’t be the same Jaguares, but I still would think it’s better having them than keeping the Rebels. The other options aren’t really realistic 25’ options, no. From reading this authors last article I think if the new board can get the investment they seem to be confident in, you keeping them simply for the amount of money they’ll be investing in the game. Then ditch them later if they’re not good enough without such a high budget. Use them to get Jaguares reintergration stronger, with more key players on board, and have success drive success.

16 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE The case for keeping the Melbourne Rebels in Super Rugby Pacific The case for keeping the Melbourne Rebels in Super Rugby Pacific
Search