Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

Cheika refuses to criticise Folau for controversial remarks

By Tom Webber
Australia coach Michael Cheika (L) and full-back Israel Folau (R)

Australia coach Michael Cheika refused to criticise full-back Israel Folau for his controversial comments on homosexuality.

ADVERTISEMENT

Folau avoided punishment from Rugby Australia after stating on Instagram that gay people should go to “hell” unless they “repent their sins and turn to God”.

The 29-year-old again courted controversy last week by tweeting a link to a video that warned against the “tolerance” of same-sex marriage.

Rather than condemn Folau, Wallabies coach Cheika suggested youngsters should look for alternative role models if they do not agree with such beliefs.

Asked what his message to a gay youngster who looked up to Folau would be, Cheika told Fox Sports Australia: “There’s been a lot made of [this].

“Self-esteem in people, no matter who they are, is extremely important – self-belief, self-esteem – and if that’s something that you don’t agree with, then you detach from that.

Video Spacer

“That way it’ll be, ‘He’s no longer my idol,’ if that’s the case.”

Cheika asserted his belief that it is down to parents to shield young people from potentially harmful opinions on social media.

ADVERTISEMENT

“You’ve got to protect those kids from everything that’s out there – us as parents, which I am, and as coaches, which I try to do with the [Wallabies] lads, because it happens all around,” he said.

“Players are getting the same in return – nasty messages on social media.

“It’s about trying to build that self-belief in them, so they’re not affected by those things, because we don’t want people to be affected by stuff like that.

“That is 100 per cent clear.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Singapore SVNS Day 1 - Replay

Fresh Starts | Episode 3 | Cobus Reinach

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 11

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

The Breakfast Show | Episode 7

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Pacific Four Series 2024 | Canada vs USA

Japan Rugby League One | Verblitz v Eagles | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
Jon 11 hours ago
The case for keeping the Melbourne Rebels in Super Rugby Pacific

I have heard it asked if RA is essentially one of the part owners and I suppose therefor should be on the other side of these two parties. If they purchased the rebels and guaranteed them, and are responsible enough they incur Rebels penalties, where is this line drawn? Seems rough to have to pay a penalty for something were your involvement sees you on the side of the conned party, the creditors. If the Rebels directors themselves have given the club their money, 6mil worth right, why aren’t they also listed as sitting with RA and the Tax office? And the legal threat was either way, new Rebels or defunct, I can’t see how RA assume the threat was less likely enough to warrant comment about it in this article. Surely RA ignore that and only worry about whether they can defend it or not, which they have reported as being comfortable with. So in effect wouldn’t it be more accurate to say there is no further legal threat (or worry) in denying the deal. Unless the directors have reneged on that. > Returns of a Japanese team or even Argentinean side, the Jaguares, were said to be on the cards, as were the ideas of standing up brand new teams in Hawaii or even Los Angeles – crazy ideas that seemingly forgot the time zone issues often cited as a turn-off for viewers when the competition contained teams from South Africa. Those timezones are great for SR and are what will probably be needed to unlock its future (cant see it remaining without _atleast _help from Aus), day games here are night games on the West Coast of america, were potential viewers triple, win win. With one of the best and easiest ways to unlock that being to play games or a host a team there. Less good the further across Aus you get though. Jaguares wouldn’t be the same Jaguares, but I still would think it’s better having them than keeping the Rebels. The other options aren’t really realistic 25’ options, no. From reading this authors last article I think if the new board can get the investment they seem to be confident in, you keeping them simply for the amount of money they’ll be investing in the game. Then ditch them later if they’re not good enough without such a high budget. Use them to get Jaguares reintergration stronger, with more key players on board, and have success drive success.

28 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Hacjivah Dayimani exits SA on back of Springboks snub Hacjivah Dayimani exits SA following Springbok snub
Search