Bear-Faced Cheek From Bristol - Andy Goode
Barely promoted and already changing the identity of the club, the Bristol Bears backlash has begun and I can see why many are finding it hard to bear.
Ok, that’s enough of the puns but I genuinely thought it was an April Fool’s joke when I heard the news and that it was some sort of marketing stunt to promote the club after they’d sealed promotion. I just think it’s bizarre and I’m really not sure about the motivation behind it.
I played against Bristol when they were known as the Shoguns but that was all to do with Mitsubishi so you can understand it when there’s a sponsorship element and there’s money coming in. To rebrand as Bristol Bears is just a gimmick, though. They have no association with bears whatsoever. When was the last time you saw a bear in the West Country?
I appreciate their desire to capitalise commercially but I’m not sure it’ll have the effect they want and they really should be focusing on getting their product right on the field first. Bristol haven’t done that over the last decade or so and they’ve been up and down so many times that the Bristol Yo-Yos might have been a more appropriate nickname!
Someone has been paid a shed load of money to come up with this branding and I think it’s daylight robbery. They’re just opening themselves up to being labelled the Bristol Teddy Bears and attracting all the wrong headlines. Even the logo looks quite cuddly.
They obviously wanted something that younger fans can relate to and I’m sure they’ll have a big bear as a mascot but I’m not sure that and the other reasons are enough to warrant changing the name of the club.
The counterpoint is that nobody is criticising the likes of Sale, Leicester, Northampton, Wasps and others but they are all institutions. I know you have to start somewhere but it’s not comparable to Wasps, who have been called that for over 150 years, and I can’t help but feel they’re trying to run before they can walk in the Premiership.
The timing of it just a few days after they’ve won promotion is ill-advised as well for me. Some marketing guru has come up with this and I think it’s a gimmick that makes them look a bit foolish before they’ve even played a game in the top flight.
They’re going to be in a real battle next season and the media are going to have a field day with headlines and puns and references to big cuddly bears. They will be a lot more competitive this time than a couple of years ago but I really think it’s going to be a sideshow that they just didn’t need.
If you’re going to do it, at least cement yourselves in the Premiership and achieve some level of sustainability and then maybe think about this in a few years’ time.
You only need to look at the reaction on social media to see that a lot of people think it’s a bit of a joke but I suppose some will say I’m looking at it from a purely rugby angle and the marketing teams will obviously be looking at it from a different perspective.
I guarantee the boys will be laughing in that changing room though. There will be jokes going around about cuddly teddy bears and grizzly bears and players asking what sort of bear they’re going to be today.
Of course, they’ll be showing a united front to the outside world because the club are the ones paying their wages and I don’t think they’ll be bothered by it but it’s just a gimmick that’s come from the marketing departments and they’ll see through that.
I remember when I was at Bromsgrove school we rebranded our first team Bromsgrove buffaloes and had jumpers made and all sorts. It was a bit of fun for us as school kids and this feels the same really for Bristol.
And, it goes without saying that the fans are an integral part in all this. They should be consulted as they pay their very hard-earned cash to watch the games week in week out and that’s one of the biggest drivers in terms of revenue.
It all feels like it’s been done a bit cloak and dagger – we’ve been promoted, now here we are… the Bristol Bears. I think it’s ill-advised and poorly-timed but any press is good press in terms of branding and getting the name out there.
Gallagher are coming in as a US company to sponsor the premiership and some people have put two and two together and made five but there’s no way they’re insisting they want certain clubs rebranded to be more Americanised just because they’re an American company.
It is true that Gloucester have three different new logos that they’re considering but they changed the badge not too long ago and I can’t see them following a similar path to Bristol. The Shed would go absolutely wild if they tried to become the Gloucester Gladiators!
Ultimately, rugby is a sport in its infancy in terms of professionalism, we’re only 22 years in. As a result, there are a lot of people coming in with different ideas trying to generate as much interest and revenue as possible. They’ll go down various avenues and some will work but some won’t.
Bristol have gone all out to change their name and try to increase their revenue but this one might just be a miss rather than a hit.
Comments on RugbyPass
The rugby championship would be even stronger with Fiji in it… I know it doesen’t fit the long term plans of NZ or Aus but you are robbing a whole nation of being able to see their best players play for Fiji…. Every second player in NZ and AUS teams has Fijian surnames… shame on you!!! World rugby won’t step in either as France and England has now also joined in…. I guess where money is involved it will always be the poor countries missing out….
76 Go to commentsNo surprise there. How hard can it be to pick a ball off the ground and chuck it to a mate? 😂
2 Go to commentsSometimes people just like a moan mate!
1 Go to commentsexcellent idea ! rugby needs this 💪
9 Go to comments9 Brumbies! What a joke! The best performing team in Oz! Ditch Skelton for Swain or Neville. Ryan Lonergan ahead of McDermott any day! Best selection bolter is Toole … amazing player
12 Go to commentsI like this, but ultimately rugby already has enough trophies. Trying to make more games “consequential" might prove to be a fools errand, although this is a less bad idea than some others. Minor quibble with the title of the article; it isn’t very meaningful to say the boks are the unofficial world champions when it would be functionally impossible for the Raeburn trophy not to be held by the world champions. There’s a period of a few months every 4 years when there is no “unofficial” world champion, and the Raeburn trophy is held by the actual world champions.
9 Go to commentsIts a great idea but one that I dont think will have a lot of traction. It will depend on the prestige that they each hold but if you can do that it would be great. When Japan beat the Boks (my team) I was absolutely devestated but I wont deny the great game they played that day. We were outclassed and it was one of the best games of rugby I have seen. Using an idea like this you might just give the the underdog teams more of an opportunity to beat the big teams and I can absolutely see it being a brilliant display of rugby. They beat us because they planned for that game. It was a great moment for Japan. This way we can remove the 4 year wait and give teams something to aim for outside of World Cup years.
9 Go to commentsHi, Dave here. Happy to answer questions 🥰
9 Go to commentsDon’t think that headline is accurate. It’s great to see Aus doing better but I’m not sure they’ve shown much threat to the top of the table. They shouldn’t be inflating wins against the lousy Highlanders and Crusaders either.
3 Go to commentsSuch a shame Roigard and Aumua picked up long term injuries, probably the two form players in the comp. Also, pretty sure Clarke Dermody isn’t their coach. Got it half right though.
3 Go to commentsOh the Aussie media, they never learn. At least Andrew Kellaway is like “Woah, yeah it’s great, but settle down there guys” having endured years of the Aussie media, fans, and often their players getting ahead of themselves only to fall flat on their faces. Have the “We'll win the Bledisloe for sure this year!” headlines started yet? It’s simple to see what’s going on. The Aussie teams are settled, they didn't lose any of their major players overseas. The Crusaders and Chiefs lost key experienced All Blacks, and Razor in the Crusaders case, and clearly neither are anywhere near as strong as last year (The Canes and Blues would probably be 3rd & 4th if they were). The Highlanders are annually average, even more so post-Aaron Smith and a big squad clean out. The two teams at the top? The two nz sides with largely the same settled roster as last year, except Ardie Savea for the Canes. They’ve both got far better coaches now too. If the Aussies are going to win the title, this is the year the kiwi sides will be weakest, so they better take their chance.
3 Go to commentsThe World Cup has to be the gold standard, line in the sand. 113 teams compete for what is the opportunity to make the pool stages, and then the knockout games for the trophy. The concept is sound. This must have been the rationale when the World Cup was created, surely? But I’m all for Looking forward and finding new ways for the SH to dominate the NH into the future. The autumn series needs a change up. Let’s start by having the NH teams come south every odd year for the Autumn/Spring series games?
9 Go to commentsWhat’ll happen when the AI models of the future go back in time and try to destroy the AI models of the past standing in their way of certain victory?
41 Go to commentsThanks, Nick. We (Seanny Maloney, Brett and I) just discussed Charlie as a potential Wallaby No 8, and wondered if he has truly realised how big he is in contact (and whether he can add 5 kg w/o slowing down). Your scouting report confirms our suspicions he has the materiel. No one knows if he has the mentality (as Johann van Graan said this week about CJ, Duane and Alfie B) to carry 10-15 times a game.
57 Go to commentsHe would be a great player for the Stormers, Dobbo should approach the guy.
3 Go to commentsGood article. A few years back when he was playing for the Cheetahs, he was a quiet standout for exactly the seasons stated here. I occasionally get to see his games in the UK, and he has become a more complete player and in many ways like an Irish player. His work ethic is so suitable to the Leinster game. I wonder if Rassie would have him listed somewhere.
3 Go to commentsResults probably skewed by the fact that a few clubs have foreign fly halves in their 30s, but most teams have young English scrum halves. Results also likely to be skewed by the fact that many teams rely on centres and fullbacks to provide depth at 10, whereas they will need to stock a large number of specialist backup 9s.
2 Go to commentsI really get the sense that when all is said and done, the path of least resistance will end up being a merger of Wasps & Worcester that essentially kills the Worcester Warriors brand and sees Wasps permanently playing at Sixways. I’m not saying that’s what should happen or what I want to happen. I just think it’s the easiest rout to take and therefore, will be what happens. Wasps will definitely return to play first, and I suppose it all depends on if they can find support at Sixways. If people turn up and support Wasps in that community, at that ground, I bet they drop the Sevenoaks plan and just remain at Sixways. Under the radar but not totally unrelated, it looks as though London Irish are going to be brought back from the dead by a German consortium and look set to return, likely to the remade Championship. It’s set to have 12 clubs next season with 14 in 2025/26, what do you want to bet those extra 2 are Wasps and London Irish?
3 Go to commentsThe shoulder is a “joint” with multiple bones. You don’t “fracture” a shoulder, you fracture any one or more of the bones that make up a shoulder.
2 Go to commentsOh dear, bones too suspect to continue?
2 Go to comments