Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

World Rugby to work in “active partnership” with unions to raise investment and standards

By Martyn Thomas
(L-R) Rachel Malcolm (Scotland), Saki Minami (Japan), Siwan Lillicrap (Wales), Shannon Perry (Australia), Gaelle Hermet (France), Sarah Hunter (England), Kennedy Simon (New Zealand), Sereima Leweniqila (Fiji), Kate Zackary (USA), Nolusindiso Booi (South Africa), Sophie de Goede (Canada) and Elisa Giordano (Italy) pose in front of a mural specially created for the tournament during the Rugby World Cup 2021 Captains' Photocall at Eden Park on 2 October, 2022 in Auckland, New Zealand. (Photo by Hagen Hopkins - World Rugby/World Rugby via Getty Images)

World Rugby has committed to taking a more proactive approach to generating investment to support the growth of the women’s game as it bids to close the competition gap in the next decade.

ADVERTISEMENT

On Tuesday, the governing body launched the Accelerate framework, a new targeted investment approach that it hopes will “supercharge the development of women’s rugby on and off the field”.

Focusing initially on 20 unions capable of qualifying for WXV and Rugby World Cup 2025, World Rugby’s aim is to develop partnerships within those nations to help drive investment and raise standards in the ten years leading up to RWC 2033 in the USA.

A pilot project in Australia has already generated AU$2 million in government funding and enabled the Rugby World Cup 2027 and 2029 hosts to increase support for its Super W competition and offer 35 part-time contracts to Wallaroos players.

“Accelerate is a plan that increases our investment and the way we work in active partnership with up to 20 unions,” World Rugby Chief of Women’s Rugby Sally Horrox said at SportsPro Live 2023.

“That’s not just about the pinnacle of the game because what we believe we need to do is build from that base.

“Because we haven’t got the depth of talent, we haven’t got the pathways, we haven’t got the domestic competitions, cross-border competitions globally, that will allow us to thrive as a sport.

ADVERTISEMENT

“We believe that we need to work with our union partners to increase collective investment. That’s government, that’s brands, that’s media partners, that’s us and resources, which means people on the ground to fast-track the development of the sport in those countries.”

Key to the success of the Accelerate programme, Horrox says, will be “specifically identifying the things that are going to make the most difference” in each of the participating unions.

Referencing the initial pilot programme, Horrox added: “Raising standards in the Super W league, making sure that there are full-time coaches, strength and conditioning staff, physiotherapists, we are actively engaged in making that happen in Australia.

“We will match-fund appointments, we will take some risk and reward on that on the ground. We will put workforce out into these countries.

ADVERTISEMENT

“What we can’t be is a substitute for local investment, our partners have to want to do it with us. But it’s about [identifying] what are the three transformational initiatives in each country that are going to make the difference, and then we can get behind them and we plan them.”

Following on from the pilot project in Australia, USA Rugby has been offered support as the country builds towards hosting the Los Angeles 2028 Olympic Games as well as the Rugby World Cup in 2031 and 2033.

World Rugby will then begin to work with other unions it has identified in the build-up to RWC 2025 in England.

Participating nations will need to show a willingness to generate and match investment, while reaching minimum standards in terms of leadership and governance.

Although 20 have been identified ahead of the programme’s launch, that number will remain “quite fluid” as Horrox acknowledges the governing body cannot ignore member unions outside of that initial group.

“We’ve got to be strategic and targeted, so it is about casting the net pretty widely,” World Rugby CEO Alan Gilpin said.

“Do we want the women’s game, in terms of international competitiveness in ten years’ time, to mirror the men’s game? No, we want more depth.

“If we’re going to create that competitive depth, we’ve got to give all those nations a pathway to that.

“So, the regional competitions very clearly having a pathway to WXV, which they have, and then once you’re in WXV in that year in a pool of six, you’re playing against the right type of opposition.

“We should start to address those blowout results because actually what the teams need is to play the teams right around them in terms of capability, that’s how we’re going to see improvement.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Fresh Starts | Episode 1 | Will Skelton

ABBIE WARD: A BUMP IN THE ROAD

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 8

James Cook | The Big Jim Show | Full Episode

New Zealand victorious in TENSE final | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Men's Highlights

New Zealand crowned BACK-TO-BACK champions | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Women's Highlights

Japan Rugby League One | Steelers v Sungoliath | Full Match Replay

Rugby Europe Women's Championship | Netherlands v Spain

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

S
Senzo Cicero 13 hours ago
'If the South Africans are in, they need to be all in'

1. True, if that “free” ticket means access to all but the prized exhibit - EVIP only. SA cannot host semis, even if they’ve earned it (see Sharks vs ASM Clermont Auvergne at… Twickenham Stoop). 2. Why no selective outrage over Lyon doing the exact same thing a week earlier? Out of all the countries France send the most “B teams”, why nobody talking about “disrespect” and “prioritising domestic leagues” and “kicking them out”? 3. Why no mention of the Sharks fielding all of their Springboks for the second rate Challenge cup QF? No commitment? 4. Why no mention of all the SA teams qualifying for respective euro knock out comps in the two seasons they’ve been in it? How many euro teams have qualified for KO’s in their history? Can’t compete? 5. Why no mention of SA teams beating French and English giants La Rochelle and Saracens? How many euro teams have done that in their history? Add no quality? The fact is that SA teams are only in their second season in europe, with no status and a fraction of the resources. Since joining the URC, SA has seen a repatriation of a number of players, and this will only grow once SA start sharing in the profits of competing in these comps, meaning bigger squads with greater depth and quality, meaning they don’t have to prioritise comps as they have to now - they don’t have imports from Pacifica and South America and everywhere else in between like “European” teams have - also less “Saffas” in Prem and T14, that’s what we want right? 'If the South Africans are in, they need to be all in' True, and we have to ensure we give them the same status and resources as we give everyone else to do just that. A small compromise on scheduling will go a long way in avoiding these situations, but guess what, France and England wont compromise on scheduling because they ironically… prioritise their domestic comps, go figure!

19 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE 'If the South Africans are in, they need to be all in' 'If the South Africans are in, they need to be all in'
Search