Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

World Cup contenders eye up Dave Rennie

Glasgow Warriors head coach Dave Rennie. (Photo by Henry Browne/Getty Images)

Glasgow Warriors head coach Dave Rennie has emerged as a leading contender to replace Michael Cheika for the Wallabies job after this year’s World Cup.

ADVERTISEMENT

According to a report from Stuff, Rennie has been identified as a secondary option behind England head coach Eddie Jones and Wales head coach Warren Gatland as coaches at the top of Rugby Australia’s “dream list”.

New Australian director of rugby Scott Johnson is believed to be an admirer of Rennie’s coaching abilities, with the former Chiefs coach – who claimed back-to-back Super Rugby titles in his debut two seasons with the franchise in 2012 and 2013 – being a composed, intelligent coach.

Rennie, a former Wellington and Cook Islands representative, has also had spells at provincial level with Wellington and Manawatu, while also winning three consecutive world titles with the New Zealand U20 side from 2008 to 2010.

Since leaving the Chiefs in 2017, Rennie has been at the helm of Glasgow, working in Scotland during the same time that Johnson has been working as the country’s director of rugby.

However, the 55-year-old is locked in with the Warriors until the middle of 2020 after agreeing to a one-year extension on his contract in January, making things difficult for RA if they are looking to secure his signature.

“I’m going to be here for at least another year and a half – possibly longer,” Rennie told BBC Sport at the time of his contract extension.

“It’s been really good. We’re happy, and my wife is happy, that’s the key.

“If I’m not here who is going to be running the show and contracting? It gives players clarity over who is going to be here.”

The Short Ball – The World Rugby Nations Championship Debacle:

ADVERTISEMENT

Video Spacer

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 11

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Pacific Four Series 2024 | Canada vs USA

Japan Rugby League One | Verblitz v Eagles | Full Match Replay

Fresh Starts | Episode 2 | Sam Whitelock

Royal Navy Men v Royal Air Force Men | Full Match Replay

Royal Navy Women v Royal Air Force Women | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
Jon 7 hours ago
The case for keeping the Melbourne Rebels in Super Rugby Pacific

I have heard it asked if RA is essentially one of the part owners and I suppose therefor should be on the other side of these two parties. If they purchased the rebels and guaranteed them, and are responsible enough they incur Rebels penalties, where is this line drawn? Seems rough to have to pay a penalty for something were your involvement sees you on the side of the conned party, the creditors. If the Rebels directors themselves have given the club their money, 6mil worth right, why aren’t they also listed as sitting with RA and the Tax office? And the legal threat was either way, new Rebels or defunct, I can’t see how RA assume the threat was less likely enough to warrant comment about it in this article. Surely RA ignore that and only worry about whether they can defend it or not, which they have reported as being comfortable with. So in effect wouldn’t it be more accurate to say there is no further legal threat (or worry) in denying the deal. Unless the directors have reneged on that. > Returns of a Japanese team or even Argentinean side, the Jaguares, were said to be on the cards, as were the ideas of standing up brand new teams in Hawaii or even Los Angeles – crazy ideas that seemingly forgot the time zone issues often cited as a turn-off for viewers when the competition contained teams from South Africa. Those timezones are great for SR and are what will probably be needed to unlock its future (cant see it remaining without _atleast _help from Aus), day games here are night games on the West Coast of america, were potential viewers triple, win win. With one of the best and easiest ways to unlock that being to play games or a host a team there. Less good the further across Aus you get though. Jaguares wouldn’t be the same Jaguares, but I still would think it’s better having them than keeping the Rebels. The other options aren’t really realistic 25’ options, no. From reading this authors last article I think if the new board can get the investment they seem to be confident in, you keeping them simply for the amount of money they’ll be investing in the game. Then ditch them later if they’re not good enough without such a high budget. Use them to get Jaguares reintergration stronger, with more key players on board, and have success drive success.

19 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE 'Had Feyi-Waboso stayed with us, he’d be playing for Wales by now - he should be playing for Wales.' 'Had Feyi-Waboso stayed with us, he’d be playing for Wales by now - he should be playing for Wales.'
Search