Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

Who knew that New Zealand's players were experts in hundred-million dollar deals

By Hamish Bidwell
(Photo by Lorenzo Di Cola/NurPhoto via Getty Images)

What would your local provincial rugby union do with $500,000?

How would a legacy fund, which could be dipped into annually, benefit the game in your region?

Can you think of various projects and programmes that have had to be shelved over the years due to a lack of funding?

ADVERTISEMENT

Do you believe the bottom of New Zealand’s rugby pyramid is dying of neglect?

It doesn’t have to, you know. The provincial and community game could be in better heart, provided Rob Nichol says so.

Video Spacer

Why Rieko Ioane can be a world class centre | Healthspan Elite Performer of the Week

Video Spacer

Why Rieko Ioane can be a world class centre | Healthspan Elite Performer of the Week

Nichol, the New Zealand Rugby Players’ Association (NZRPA) chief executive, has been in the news again. Apparently talks between his outfit and New Zealand Rugby (NZR), on the vexed issue of Silver Lake’s proposed equity deal, are progressing positively.

That’s nice. But for whom?

For bankrupted provincial unions with dwindling participation rates? For all the struggling clubs out there who are one poorly-attended sausage sizzle away from oblivion?

Or are we simply talking about the negotiations resulting in more pay, more sabbaticals and more perks for the pampered few at the top of the NZRPA pyramid?

Let’s be frank, NZR have not sold or executed the Silver Lake deal well. They had two lots of folk to get on board – the 26 provincial unions and the players – and they trumpeted an agreement with the former before they’d properly sat down with the latter.

ADVERTISEMENT

In doing so, they allowed Nichol to control the narrative.

We’ve heard plenty about the downsides of private equity investment, via the NZRPA.

Who knew that so many players were so expert in the world of multi-million dollar deals? Who knew that it was their right to decide where the money comes from to pay their wages? Who knew that it was actually these players, rather than the governing body, who actually had the game’s best interests at heart?

There we were thinking that the NZRPA was simply a trade union with no regard for anybody but themselves.

As far as it’s been explained to me, each of New Zealand’s 26 provincial unions stands to gain a minimum of $500,000 from the Silver Lake deal, with every referees’ association to receive $10,000.

On top of that, a fund will be put in place that will enable unions and clubs to apply for funds on an annual basis to assist with projects or development initiatives.

ADVERTISEMENT

That doesn’t suddenly cure all the game’s ills, but it’s a start. The shame is that NZR, for whatever reason, haven’t sought to shout this stuff from the rooftops.

Maybe they chose to take the high road. Maybe, unlike the NZRPA, they believed it was better to keep details of the negotiations behind closed doors. Maybe they’d hoped the players would simply be grateful to see a big chunk of change coming into the coffers.

Nichol and his lot are one thing. He’s tasked with acting and negotiating in the best interests of his members and you’d have to say he’s done that.

But whether the players are actually entitled to exert this much control over their employers is definitely another.

I’d have to say that, of the people involved in rugby at all levels in New Zealand, I’m least interested in or sympathetic towards our professional elite.

But, then, this whole episode speaks to the continued ineptitude of NZR.

They have – or at least should have – the greatest production line of talent in the world at their disposal. The All Blacks themselves have been the envy of codes and teams across the globe for decades, many of whom have sought to emulate aspects of how that environment operates.

Yet NZR struggle to make a buck, they struggle to retain talent and they struggle to identify and appoint the right people for key roles.

If they can’t even sell the players on the idea of $387.5 million investment into the game, then is it little wonder that the production line has run out of steam or that the All Blacks are only mediocre?

Rugby in New Zealand is bigger than the All Blacks and it’s sure as eggs bigger than Rob Nichol. Or at least it should be.

Instead, Nichol continues to run rings around our administrators, at a time when the wider game is crying out for the cash injection that private equity would provide.

Lot of people look at talk of the Silver Lake deal as a bore. They don’t see how it might benefit them or the game they love so much.

That’s on NZR, whose obsession with being seen to do the right thing, invariably results in doing the wrong one.

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Fresh Starts | Episode 2 | Sam Whitelock

Royal Navy Men v Royal Air Force Men | Full Match Replay

Royal Navy Women v Royal Air Force Women | Full Match Replay

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 9

James Cook | The Big Jim Show | Full Episode

New Zealand victorious in TENSE final | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Men's Highlights

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

F
Flankly 7 hours ago
The AI advantage: How the next two Rugby World Cups will be won

If rugby wants to remain interesting in the AI era then it will need to work on changing the rules. AI will reduce the tactical advantage of smart game plans, will neutralize primary attacking weapons, and will move rugby from a being a game of inches to a game of millimetres. It will be about sheer athleticism and technique,about avoiding mistakes, and about referees. Many fans will find that boring. The answer is to add creative degrees of freedom to the game. The 50-22 is an example. But we can have fun inventing others, like the right to add more players for X minutes per game, or the equivalent of the 2-point conversion in American football, the ability to call a 12-player scrum, etc. Not saying these are great ideas, but making the point that the more of these alternatives you allow, the less AI will be able to lock down high-probability strategies. This is not because AI does not have the compute power, but because it has more choices and has less data, or less-specific data. That will take time and debate, but big, positive and immediate impact could be in the area of ref/TMO assistance. The technology is easily good enough today to detect forward passes, not-straight lineouts, offside at breakdown/scrum/lineout, obstruction, early/late tackles, and a lot of other things. WR should be ultra aggressive in doing this, as it will really help in an area in which the game is really struggling. In the long run there needs to be substantial creativity applied to the rules. Without that AI (along with all of the pro innovations) will turn rugby into a bash fest.

24 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE Charlie Cale may be the answer to Joe Schmidt's back-row prayers Charlie Cale may be the answer to Joe Schmidt's back-row prayers
Search