Underhill must get 'smarter' - Neil Back
Former England openside Neil Back believes England’s backrow play needs to improve if England are to beat the best sides in the world.
What’s more, Back believes that the heir apparent to England’s openside – Sam Underhill – needs to be ‘smarter’ in the contact zone to develop his game.
“England’s game has developed since 2015. Yes, Eddie was picking the ‘6.5’ type players, but that’s the way the game was being played in the Premiership,” Back told RugbyPass.
“Since the World Cup, there has been a drive to develop an attacking philosophy. It was clear that Southern Hemisphere had the edge in that area at the World Cup. Their domestic game translates better into the international scene.
“You have to remember that it’s not the England coach’s job to tell Premiership teams how to play rugby.”
A World Cup winner in 2003, the 49-year-old believes England’s backrowers need to rediscover the somewhat lost art of link play and try to create for players around them, as opposed to soley carrying or making big defensive hits.
Back – an openside specialist – believes Sam Underhill is a case in point.
“Of course he’s got to concentrate on the perfecting his tackle technique but he has to get smarter too. You see him looking to make big hits, but that can take you off your feet.
“If you’re off your feet you’re out of the game. Intelligence in the tackle area is vital – getting over the ball quickly. You need to stay in motion and stay in the game.
“Billy Vunipola carries really well but you also see him putting other players into space, and getting the ball out of contact. If you look at the Southern Hemisphere in terms of speed of ball at contact, one out three times it’s fast-ball. In the Northern Hemisphere it’s probably about one in five.”
Back believes England’s link play needs to improve further to beat elite sides.
“The forwards need to get more comfortable with ball-in-hand. Our front five are good carriers, but the best defences can stop them.”
Back played the bulk of his career at around 92kg, a modest amount by modern standards where backrows under 100kg are scarce. He believes that while “height, weight and how much you can lift in the gym” are important metrics, they are not the be all and end all.
“I played between 88kg at my lightest and 95kg. Even when I was 95kg of lean body mass, I felt I was too heavy. My fighting weight was about 92-93kg.
“It’s about maximising the physical potential of an individual,” says Back. “No coach ever told me I was too small. My point of difference was that I was pound-for-pound one of the most powerful players in my position and I was a consistent performer.
“If that meant me getting over the ball, clearing a ruck, getting an offload away or putting a bigger player into space to make a carry, that’s what I did.
“If you’re good enough, you’re big enough. I worked my hind legs off and I never left thinking ‘What if?’.”
Back’s career spanned eight years as an amateur player and nine years as a professional, and is well placed to see how the game has gone. Asked whether if he started playing rugby now would he have become an international backrow, his answer comes without hesitation.
“100 per cent I’d be playing for England. I’ll always back myself.”
Join World Cup 2003 heroes Neil Back, Will Greenwood and Mike Tindall at the all-new Wolf Run obstacle race in East Sussex on 28th April. Get your pack together with the buy four get one free offer – www.thewolfrun.com
Comments on RugbyPass
Dad Marty was also a handy rugby player for Linwood back in the day. Great bloke. Sensational softball career.
2 Go to commentsWhat ifs are always dangerous. If you look at the game before Sam cane got sent of SA was dominating. You could make the argument the going down to 14 men rallied the troops and made them have to play to win which is always dangerous.
129 Go to commentsOmg… you are bruised And battered Benny. Stop crying … the scoreboard speaks. What a pathetic lover you are.. 🤣🤣🤣
129 Go to commentsPacific Lions, cry me a river
129 Go to commentsThis is the single worst piece of journalism I have ever seen since your last one. As a neutral, who really states that there should be an asterisk next to a win? You are an utter embarrassment to real AB fans, journalism and that joke of a house which pays you for this nonsense. Get a life, Ben.
129 Go to commentsGuys. Cancel the World Cup champions after this analysis. It changes everything. Ben knows. We’ll have to unengrave the Bokke off the trophy and hand it to the ABs, now that I’ve been enlightened about this illegitimate win. This needs to be done. Now!
129 Go to commentsBen is right here though, Springboks were woefully poor with the advantage they had throughout this game. The France match was heroic because that was an even contest this match had it taken place in Rugby Championship would have been an easy win for NZ. If anything this match should tell the Bok coaches that a lot of this team should be changed. They beat this same NZ team by record margin with the same circumstances but with a different core. They bring back the tried and tested guys and they nearly botch this game.
129 Go to commentsI knew who wrote this article from the first few words in the headline…lol. The red card actually did the ABs a favour. It galvanized them, only then did they step up a gear. Before that there was zero momentum.
129 Go to commentsFirstly the foul on Bongi was a planned move just like the NZ master plan with Bryce Lawrence you kiwis are filthy fux perhaps try to play a cleaner game next time I doubt that’s possible tho but don’t worry world rugby is on yr side they trying to take away all the BOKS strengths to help all you weakling as Jeremy Clarkson would say LA OO ZA ERR..🤣
129 Go to commentsAbsolutely spot on Ben. I certainly wouldn't gloat over a win like that. Frustrating as it is it's done and dusted and history will forever show the result.
129 Go to commentsHo hum.
129 Go to commentsNo question they were the better team. But that is the beauty of sport isn’t it!
129 Go to commentsEveryone is into Hurling in Ireland according to Porter, but only 11 of Ireland's 32 counties enter a team into the national competition. Same old blarney.
1 Go to commentsLet’s be honest. The draw and scheduling in the World Cup was a joke but South Africa found a way after having to go the hard (nearly impossible) way to the Cup Final via France and England. NZ had a hard game against France (lost) and had 5 weeks to prepare for the Quarter, 3 weeks knowing it was Ireland. NZ theerfore had to win one big game against an Irish team who played SA and then Scotland 7 days before. They won and it was de facto a semi final because they were playing a relatively weak Argentina team and it was a walk over. In the final a very rested NZ team was playing a very tired SA team and still lost. They couldn’t score more than 11 points. Put another way SA had to find a way to win while tired and they achieved that. NZ should thank their lucky stars that they fixed the scheduling in 2015 otherwise they would be dealing with a Bok treble.
129 Go to commentsPerhaps if Bongi wasn’t targeted and removed from the game in the first 3 minutes it would have been quite a different game. Maybe if NZ also faced the same competition the Boks faced to their win NZ would have looked quite different. The final score shows who outplayed who.
129 Go to commentsRubbish article! Abuladze played most of Exeters matches when fit. He got injured against Glasgow a while ago and is out for the rest of the season, thats why he hasnt played for Exeter and Georgia recently. Do some proper research next time!
1 Go to commentsGotta love it when kids throw their toys out the pram and can’t hack it with the grown ups debate. Here’s looking at you turlough! 😉🤣
148 Go to commentsThey lost the game period move on
129 Go to commentsSpringboks won! Stop winging. You can change the game however much you and your rugby colonizing IRB want to and the Springboks will win you at that too. Your mind is colonized my friend get a life
129 Go to commentsBen, nobody gets fooled anymore by selective and biased data to support an hypothesis. Games are decided on such small margins these days that you win some and lose some, and dominance is a thing of the rugby past. Look at the RWC circle of fortune…. Ireland beats SA who beat France who beat NZ who beat Ireland. And so it goes on. Match officials help to eliminate real indiscretions. If they had been with us years before, no doubt results would have been different. Remember Andy Haden’s dive from a lineout in 1978 for which a match-wining penalty was awarded? Wales should have beaten the ABs that day. They took the loss like the gentlemen they were.
129 Go to comments