Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

This Springbok side isn't running with the All Blacks, or even at them, anymore

By Ben Smith
(Photos by AAP Image/Darren England / www.photosport.nz)

Jordie Barrett’s clutch long-range penalty goal will paper over many aspects of the All Blacks‘ play in Townsville, which might have been one of the worst performances in a long time from an execution point of view.

ADVERTISEMENT

A total of 24 turnovers is 10 more than they had in the historic 25-15 loss to the Pumas in last year’s Tri-Nations, as the accuracy of the passing and reliable ball-handling went missing against the Springboks defence.

Tactically, the All Blacks were outplayed in many aspects of the game, including up front.

Had they not watched the Springbok maul defence attempt to barrel the Wallabies’ maul over the sideline every time over the last two weeks?

Video Spacer

Eben Etzebeth speaks about the emotion of facing the haka | Rugby Championship

Video Spacer

Eben Etzebeth speaks about the emotion of facing the haka | Rugby Championship

To know that was coming and still throw to the front of the lineout, nearest to the touchline, for every maul was not very smart. And not surprisingly, it failed to yield any results.

The Wallabies protected their possessions by having Michael Hooper peel from the maul almost immediately, leaving the Springboks pack to fall to the ground and out of play for at least a phase as the Australians then built phases to attack wide, whereas the All Blacks completely ran out of room to maul as the Springbok pack manhandled them out of play.

The late scratching of Luke Jacobson, a key lineout jumping option, may have been disruptive but surely there were other calls to hit the middle or tail? With many chances to put the game to bed early, the All Blacks’ bundled their lineout mauls from the five and wasted precious scoring opportunities.

Did they not watch the Wallabies tear apart the Springboks on the fringes?

The one set-piece play that called for width early in the red zone led to a yellow card for Sbu Nkosi for a cynical piece of play that had a high likelihood of ending with an All Blacks try.

ADVERTISEMENT

With Nkosi still in the sin bin early in the second half the All Blacks went for, you guessed it, another lineout maul throwing to the front only to be repelled again and again. Then Nepo Laulala coughed up possession after being hammered in close.

When they went wide at other times in other parts of the field, they found success and big chunks of metres upfield yet in the red zone, they wanted to play narrow or maul against a Boks pack that had their number.

Trucking up David Havili by himself on other plays was equally poor, leaving him isolated and without a hope in hell to retain possession against an experienced Springboks midfield and lurking back row.

His first three carries on first phase resulted in turnovers.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Wallabies used Kerevi or the wings to hit the weak lineout seam at the tail nearly every time with success to start their launches. The All Blacks ran straight into the midfield and turned the ball over too much.

There were many aspects of this All Black game plan that left a lot to be desired aside from the execution issues.

Even so, after playing with a high tempo for the first three minutes, the All Blacks were able to break the Springboks without much trouble even after an erratic Beauden Barrett pass that had to be scooped up five metres behind where it needed to be.

After that, the Springboks knew they could not handle the speed. You could be forgiven for thinking the All Blacks had just played the Springblobs, who were gassed and on the ground at every stoppage, needing help tying their shoelaces.

After defending an All Black lineout maul late in the first half as a guard – yes a guard, not even involved in the pushing – somehow, someway Trevor Nyakane needed attention for the next few minutes despite not being on the ground when the ref stopped play.

The defeatist stalling tactic was embarrassing to watch as the Springboks desperately needed to slow the game down. And it worked, with no conversations from the All Blacks leadership to the referee about the continual snail procession to every line out and scrum.

So they got what they wanted with seemingly no shame. Even the final result didn’t seem to shake their jovial and happy post-match attitude.

You would not have thought this was a side that had just lost three in a row. The game plan ‘worked’, the decisions to kick possession away late in the game were the right ones.

Yes, the game plan did put the handbrake on the All Blacks, forced them to play perhaps their worst performance of the modern era, and you know what? They still won.

So back to the drawing board because if you can’t beat them after that, when can you?

To get an All Blacks side to play so poorly and not finish them off is almost criminal with how rare those opportunities are.

Despite needing a bonus-point win to keep their slim Rugby Championship hopes alive, they rolled out a game plan that doesn’t produce a lot of tries either way, and often comes down to a few penalties goals. The Springboks kicked 38 times from hand to 18 from the All Blacks.

So they didn’t even try to retain the title, they rocked up to try and worm a win over the All Blacks, which had they achieved, would have seen them concede the trophy anyway. Defeatist.

Instead, they dragged the game into the gutter once again, bored the rugby world and got another loss for their troubles.

Faf de Klerk hoists a box kick. (Photo by Chris Hyde/Getty Images)

This was not the same approach the last time the two sides met in Japan, which was a high-paced, titanic showdown which left the world in awe as both sides used the ball frequently with balanced game plans. They kicked 24 times on that night, nearly 40 per cent less than in Townsville.

This was not the same approach, a year before that, when they upset the All Blacks in Wellington after scoring five tries, kicking just 18 times in the 36-34 thriller.

The first time the box kicking borefest came out was the Wales semi-final, where they hammered 37 kicks into the night sky in Yokohama. That volume of kicking was actually a one-off that has somehow become their ‘DNA’ in 2021.

This approach was not replicated in the final against England, with more running, more carrying and only 24 kicks.

The Lions series was really the first time this level of kicking has become the norm for the Springboks, with 37 in the first and 35 in the second test. And we were just treated to another 38 against the All Blacks after ‘too much rugby’ against the Wallabies.

To say this is who they are and how they play is simply not true.

The Springboks are capable of much more with the players at their disposal, many of whom played successful attacking rugby, compared to this current iteration, under Heyneke Meyer from 2012 to 2015. The likes of Handre Pollard, Damian de Allende, Jesse Kriel and Willie le Roux all used to get the ball frequently and pass, constructing good tries.

Meyer’s Springboks held winning records of 75 per cent plus against all bar three tier-one nations: Ireland with one win and one loss, the Wallabies at near 60 percent, and the All Blacks, who were in the middle of their two World Cup runs.

They only won one from eight against New Zealand, yet challenged them with legitimate attacking play and old school Springboks physicality – running over people. They could handle the pace of a game and when playing in South Africa, often set the pace.

Although they did not come away with wins against New Zealand, the average score was 22-15 and this was an all-time great All Blacks side. Based on their dominant results against every other country, the clashes clearly kept them in good stature.

This Springbok side isn’t running with the All Blacks, or even at them, anymore. This year the Springboks have adopted a playing style that is foreign to themselves. The defeatist, rugby equivalent of park-the-bus football.

They aren’t playing Southern Hemisphere rugby and truth be told, they might be in for a shock when they get to the Northern Hemisphere as well.

Wayne Pivac’s Welsh side are using the ball. Scotland are using the ball under Gregor Townsend. And England get to face them last up, tired, battered and wary – and you know Eddie Jones would love to reverse the World Cup final result.

Deride Northern Hemisphere rugby at your peril as what the Springboks are dishing up is actually far worse.

It is dangerously close-minded for South African rugby to think and play this current way, it is clearly one-dimensional and is not that reliable, going 2-2 when kicking more than 35 times since that semi-final in the World Cup.

If they lose to the All Blacks this week, they will be 5-5 on the year. They would then need to win two of the three games on the end of year tour just to have a winning season.

Imagine that for the World Cup holders.

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 6

Sam Warburton | The Big Jim Show | Full Episode

Japan Rugby League One | Sungoliath v Eagles | Full Match Replay

Japan Rugby League One | Spears v Wild Knights | Full Match Replay

Boks Office | Episode 10 | Six Nations Final Round Review

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | How can New Zealand rugby beat this Ireland team

Beyond 80 | Episode 5

Rugby Europe Men's Championship Final | Georgia v Portugal | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
Jon 3 hours ago
Jake White: Are modern rugby players actually better?

This is the problem with conservative mindsets and phycology, and homogenous sports, everybody wants to be the same, use the i-win template. Athlete wise everyone has to have muscles and work at the gym to make themselves more likely to hold on that one tackle. Do those players even wonder if they are now more likely to be tackled by that player as a result of there “work”? Really though, too many questions, Jake. Is it better Jake? Yes, because you still have that rugby of ole that you talk about. Is it at the highest International level anymore? No, but you go to your club or checkout your representative side and still engage with that ‘beautiful game’. Could you also have a bit of that at the top if coaches encouraged there team to play and incentivized players like Damian McKenzie and Ange Capuozzo? Of course we could. Sadly Rugby doesn’t, or didn’t, really know what direction to go when professionalism came. Things like the state of northern pitches didn’t help. Over the last two or three decades I feel like I’ve been fortunate to have all that Jake wants. There was International quality Super Rugby to adore, then the next level below I could watch club mates, pulling 9 to 5s, take on the countries best in representative rugby. Rugby played with flair and not too much riding on the consequences. It was beautiful. That largely still exists today, but with the world of rugby not quite getting things right, the picture is now being painted in NZ that that level of rugby is not required in the “pathway” to Super Rugby or All Black rugby. You might wonder if NZR is right and the pathway shouldn’t include the ‘amateur’, but let me tell you, even though the NPC might be made up of people still having to pull 9-5s, we know these people still have dreams to get out of that, and aren’t likely to give them. They will be lost. That will put a real strain on the concept of whether “visceral thrill, derring-do and joyful abandon” type rugby will remain under the professional level here in NZ. I think at some point that can be eroded as well. If only wanting the best athlete’s at the top level wasn’t enough to lose that, shutting off the next group, or level, or rugby players from easy access to express and showcase themselves certainly will. That all comes back around to the same question of professionalism in rugby and whether it got things right, and rugby is better now. Maybe the answer is turning into a “no”?

35 Go to comments
j
john 6 hours ago
Will the Crusaders' decline spark a slow death for New Zealand rugby?

But here in Australia we were told Penney was another gun kiwi coach, for the Tahs…….and yet again it turned out the kiwi coach was completely useless. Another con job on Australian rugby. As was Robbie Deans, as was Dave Rennie. Both coaches dumped from NZ and promoted to Australia as our saviour. And the Tahs lap them up knowing they are second rate and knowing that under pressure when their short comings are exposed in Australia as well, that they will fall in below the largest most powerful province and choose second rate Tah players to save their jobs. As they do and exactly as Joe Schmidt will do. Gauranteed. Schmidt was dumped by NZ too. That’s why he went overseas. That why kiwi coaches take jobs in Australia, to try and prove they are not as bad as NZ thought they were. Then when they get found out they try and ingratiate themselves to NZ again by dragging Australian teams down with ridiculous selections and game plans. NZ rugby’s biggest problem is that it can’t yet transition from MCaw Cheatism. They just don’t know how to try and win on your merits. It is still always a contest to see how much cheating you can get away with. Without a cheating genius like McCaw, they are struggling. This I think is why my wise old mate in NZ thinks Robertson will struggle. The Crusaders are the nursery of McCaw Cheatism. Sean Fitzpatrick was probably the father of it. Robertson doesn’t know anything else but other countries have worked it out.

28 Go to comments
A
Adrian 8 hours ago
Will the Crusaders' decline spark a slow death for New Zealand rugby?

Thanks Nick The loss of players to OS, injury and retirement is certainly not helping the Crusaders. Ditto the coach. IMO Penny is there to hold the fort and cop the flak until new players and a new coach come through,…and that's understood and accepted by Penny and the Crusaders hierarchy. I think though that what is happening with the Crusaders is an indicator of what is happening with the other NZ SRP teams…..and the other SRP teams for that matter. Not enough money. The money has come via the SR competition and it’s not there anymore. It's in France, Japan and England. Unless or until something is done to make SR more SELLABLE to the NZ/Australia Rugby market AND the world rugby market the $s to keep both the very best players and the next rung down won't be there. They will play away from NZ more and more. I think though that NZ will continue to produce the players and the coaches of sufficient strength for NZ to have the capacity to stay at the top. Whether they do stay at the top as an international team will depend upon whether the money flowing to SRP is somehow restored, or NZ teams play in the Japan comp, or NZ opts to pick from anywhere. As a follower of many sports I’d have to say that the organisation and promotion of Super Rugby has been for the last 20 years closest to the worst I’ve ever seen. This hasn't necessarily been caused by NZ, but it’s happened. Perhaps it can be fixed, perhaps not. The Crusaders are I think a symptom of this, not the cause

28 Go to comments
T
Trevor 10 hours ago
Will forgotten Wallabies fit the Joe Schmidt model?

Thanks Brett.. At last a positive article on the potential of Wallaby candidates, great to read. Schmidt’s record as an international rugby coach speaks for itself, I’m somewhat confident he will turn the Wallaby’s fortunes around …. on the field. It will be up to others to steady the ship off the paddock. But is there a flaw in my optimism? We have known all along that Australia has the players to be very competitive with their international rivals. We know that because everyone keeps telling us. So why the poor results? A question that requires a definitive answer before the turn around can occur. Joe Schmidt signed on for 2 years, time to encompass the Lions tour of 2025. By all accounts he puts family first and that’s fair enough, but I would wager that his 2 year contract will be extended if the next 18 months or so shows the statement “Australia has the players” proves to be correct. The new coach does not have a lot of time to meld together an outfit that will be competitive in the Rugby Championship - it will be interesting to see what happens. It will be interesting to see what happens with Giteau law, the new Wallaby coach has already verbalised that he would to prefer to select from those who play their rugby in Australia. His first test in charge is in July just over 3 months away .. not a long time. I for one wish him well .. heaven knows Australia needs some positive vibes.

21 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING 'I didn't think it would happen this early': Carbery on Munster exit 'I didn't think it would happen this early': Carbery on Munster exit
Search