The tale of two tries in the Super Rugby final
The Chiefs had the Crusaders’ number for the third time this year, but a remarkable show of fight and never-say-die attitude from Scott Robertson’s side made the most of fortuitous situations given to them.
It was astounding that the Chiefs were in it right to the very end after three yellow cards, playing for nearly 30 minutes of the contest down to 14 men. They shouldn’t have been in the game, but they were.
And when it comes down to it, there are two fortuitous situations that swayed this final in the Crusaders’ favour.
One was a disallowed try for the Chiefs and one was a Crusaders try where play was allowed to go on after a forward pass, but by the book, both should have been scrubbed.
A knock-on, forward pass or offside are all valid reasons for a TMO intervention on a scoring review, but only if they occurred in the immediate two phases of play beforehand.
Damian McKenzie jumping the gun on the deliberately overthrown lineout was able to be called back only because the Chiefs scored directly on that phase.
As soon as the try was scored, referee Ben O’Keeffe had doubts about McKenzie’s starting position and immediately went to his assistants for a discussion before referring judgement to the TMO.
Had the Crusaders’ defence been a little better and lasted more than two phases, the Chiefs likely would have been out to a 25-15 lead and potentially 27-15, without an on-field call over McKenzie happening immediately.
The Chiefs were punished harshly, but rightly so.
The Crusaders on the other hand, benefitted from having an egregious forward pass by Jack Goodhue not picked up by the on-field officials on halfway.
The Crusaders kicked at the next ruck, then the Chiefs had to clear their line into touch, handing the visitors a line out. They then scored from a fantastic set-piece launch play through Richie Mo’unga over two phases.
At that point even if the TMO Brendon Pickerill wanted to go back to the forward pass, he couldn’t, having occurred three phases earlier.
The try was from a different Crusaders’ possession, but it came directly from the decision not to pull up the forward pass, something Chiefs head coach Clayton McMillan was rightly unhappy about in his post-match evaluation.
Correct but perhaps overzealous officiating on the Chiefs’ no try was not equalled earlier as the Crusaders received a major slice of luck leading into Mo’unga’s try.
Those two fate-altering plays undoubtedly shaped the outcome of the final. Given the tightness of the result, it cannot be denied it gave the Crusaders help.
However the Chiefs will rue the decision-making in the final quarter where they held a 20-15 lead before Sam Cane’s yellow card.
A passage of attacking play lasting 12 phases inside the Crusaders’ 22 ended up losing ground before Leicester Fainga’anuku snaffled a ruck turnover.
The Crusaders defence was strong and proving so. The Chiefs were clearly running out of puff having spent 20 minutes down a man. The playmakers did not have a read on the situation or respect the Crusaders enough.
There were multiple opportunities to set up for a drop goal and take an eight point buffer but they kept trying to fall into a shape and attack wide.
Scoring plays in finals are limited and when you do finally need the points, the chance to get them might not come.
With 15 minutes to play, it was early enough to take a chance but not late enough for it to be the only one.
A missed drop goal isn’t the end of the world with possession coming back. They didn’t take it or even think about it.
The Chiefs next chance to score, which came when they did need the points down 22-20, came from a 52 metre penalty goal with less than four minutes to go, which McKenzie missed.
The last bizarre Chiefs’ possession came from a botched lineout throw that was knocked-on by Crusaders flanker Dominic Gardiner.
The ball was knocked on roughly 43 metres out from the Crusaders’ try line and O’Keeffe called advantage to the Chiefs, but the home side only went backward from there once jumping on the loose ball, never making it back anywhere near where the ball was fumbled.
O’Keeffe did not stop play and go back for the scrum, judging that the Chiefs had taken advantage despite continually losing ground, eventually back inside their own 22 where they eventually lost possession and the game.
There was still three minutes left at the beginning of that possession and the Chiefs refused to kick and put the Crusaders into a pressure zone where they must clear.
Aside from O’Keeffe’s puzzling call, the game management from the Chiefs was poor, running into the red and black wall for continual losses.
The Crusaders banked on the Chiefs’ losing this game some how through their own doing. Which they did in the end by overplaying at the wrong times and through poor discipline, despite being the better side.
And the Crusaders got a healthy slice of luck too, which is just what they needed.
The Chiefs know they have just been conned out of a title by savvy bunch of Crusaders who played a smarter game on the night.
Which will make the loss all the more painful for them.
Comments on RugbyPass
Less modern South African males predictably triggered.
10 Go to commentsMy heart is with Quins, but the head is convinced Toulouse have too much. Ntamack is back, his timing and wisdom has been missed.
1 Go to commentsWow, what a starting line up for the Sharks) Tasty up front,kremer vs Tshituka or venter …fiery ,,Lavannini ,,will he knobble etzebeth? Biggest game for belleau?
1 Go to commentsIt was rubbish to watch, Blues weren’t even present. Did what they had to do, nothing more. Should be better next week against canes.
1 Go to commentsI’ve just noticed that this match has an all-French refereeing team. Surely a game like this ought to have a neutral ref? Although looking at the BBC preview of the Saints game, Raynal is also down as reffing that - so there may be some confusion about who is reffing what.
1 Go to commentsIf Havili can play anywhere in the back line, why not first 5. #10.
11 Go to commentsThe dressing room had already left for their summer break before they ran out in Dublin that year, and that’s on the coach. Franco Smith has undoubtedly made progress, particularly their maul, developing squad players and increasing squad depth. And against a very tight budget too. That said they were too lightweight last year and got found out against both Toulon and Munster in consecutive games. Better this season so far but they’ve developed something of a slow start habit occasionally, most notably losing at home to Northampton who played them at their own game. Play offs will ultimately show whether there has been tangible progress on last year, or not…!
2 Go to commentsAustralian Rugby has been a disaster, by not incorporating learning from previous successful campaigns. QLD Reds 2011 - Waratahs 2014. Players, coaches and administrators appoint there representatives for scheduled meetings, organisation’s agreement’s assessments and correspondence. This why a unified Rugby Union under one entity works. Every Rugby nation has taken that path. Was most difficult in the Northern hemisphere with over 100 years of club rugby before the game become professional. Took a lot of humility for those unions to eventually work together.
7 Go to commentsThough Wilson’s sacking was pretty brutal, it wasn’t just down to that Leinster game; Glasgow had a lot of 2nd half collapses that season, in the URC and Europe, and only just scraped into the playoffs. Franco Smith has definitely been an improvement, some players are delivering far more than they did under Wilson.
2 Go to commentsjesus - that front 5!
1 Go to commentsShould be an absolute cracker of a game! Will be great to see DuPont & Ntamack in tandem once again🔥
1 Go to commentsBest team ever…. To have played? These guys are still pressure chokers. Came nowhere when it counted. What a joke
78 Go to commentsMusk defends anonymous terrorism, fascism, threats against individuals and children etc etc But a Rugby club account….lock ‘em up!!!
1 Go to commentsActually the era defining moment came a few years earlier. February 2002 to be precise, when Michael D Higgins as finance minister at the time introduced his sports persons tax relief bill to the dial. As the politicians of the day stated “It seems to be another daft K Club frolic born in Kildare amongst the well-paid professional jockeys with whom the Minister plays golf” and that the scheme represented “a savage uncaring vision of Ireland and one that should be condemned”. The irfu and Leinster would be nowhere near the position they are in today without this key component of the finances.
5 Go to commentsIt is crystal clear that people who make such threats on line should be tried and imprisoned. Those with responsibility in social media companies who don’t facilitate this should be convicted. In real life, I have free speech to approach someone like Reinach and verbally threaten him. I am risking a conviction or a slap but I could do it. In the old days, If someone anonymously threatened someone by letter the police would ask and use evidence from the postal system. Unlike the Post, social media companies have complete instant and legal access to the content in social media. They make money from the data, billions. Yet, they turn a blind eye to terrorism, Nazi-ism and industrial levels of threats against individuals including their address and childrens schools being published online all from ananoymous accounts not real people. They claim free speech. Free speech for anonymous trolls/voilent thugs threatening people under false names? The fault is with the perps but also social media companies who think anonymous personas posting death threats constitutes free speech.
2 Go to commentsSo if this ain’t the best Irish team ever then who exactly is? I don’t remember any other Irish team being this good & winning a series in the Land of the Long White Cloud. Yes I may rip them often for 8 X QF RWC exits & twice not even making it to the QF, but they’re a damn good team who many think can only improve, including me!
78 Go to commentsNot a squeek out of Leinster for weeks about this match. So quiet. The first team have been quitely building for this encounter under Nienaber’s direction. All fresh, all highly motivated. They are expecting a season’s best performance from Northhampton. They will match that. They will be fresher and apparently they will have 80,000 out of the 83,000 shouting for them. I do expect Northhampton to turn up big time. Not to be missed. On a tangent it is evident how the loss of a few Premiership teams has in some respect helped other Premiership teams and England. More quality over less teams makes the teams better, which has a knock on effect on England. Not the only factor contributing to England’s rise but one of them.
5 Go to commentsOur very own monster teddy bear Ox😍💪
17 Go to commentsThis is might be the most generalised, entitled, patronising, out-of-pocket cultural indictment on a group of people you’ll ever see on what is supposedly a sports publication. I can only assume the author is weak like a woman or homosexual. I’m feeling an incredible range of emotions but I am not quite sure how to express them. I might go beat up a hockey player - assuming that’s okay with Duane and the boys? 🙂
10 Go to commentsBest thing the Welsh clubs could do is apply to join Gallagher prem surely be more exciting matches for there support than they have now.
2 Go to comments