Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

The 'fine line' Baxter wants tackled in 20-minute red card debate

By PA
(Photo by Alex Davidson/Getty Images)

Exeter boss Rob Baxter believes there is some value in investigating the feasibility of 20-minute red cards. World Rugby is considering extending a law trial currently operating in the southern hemisphere’s Super Rugby tournament to other competitions, allowing them to gather more data on its impact in matches.

ADVERTISEMENT

The rule allows for a sent-off player to be tactically replaced by a substitute after 20 minutes, therefore preventing early dismissals from ruining games. It follows an increase in red cards as World Rugby looks to stamp out dangerous play, particularly high tackles involving contact with the head.

“Anyone who watches rugby knows there is a definite distinction between a straight red that is a proper, always has been, always will be, red card, and some of the ones that are kind of borderline,” said Baxter, the long-time Exeter coach. “How you distinguish between the two is the challenge, isn’t it?

Video Spacer

Mike Brown | Rugby Roots

Video Spacer

Mike Brown | Rugby Roots

“None of us would want to see a horrific piece of foul play and then a player comes on after 20 minutes, would we? At the same time, we all understand the ones where even 20 minutes can feel like a harsh one. It is worth some value in investigating, but the challenge is the distinction between what it gets awarded for.”

Yellow cards see players sent from the field for a ten-minute spell while there have been calls for potentially an orange card to be introduced as a way of tackling the grey area between yellows and marginal reds.

Related

Baxter added: “It’s a difficult one. Are we saying a red card should become 20 minutes, or should we just be saying that more things are yellow cards? A red card has to have a higher distinction to be a red card. Do you need another (colour) card, or do we just need real clarity over what is deemed red-card level?

“Probably the people talking about having orange cards or having 20-minute red cards, whatever, those are for decisions where there is a very fine line between the yellow and the red. Perhaps what we need to talk about is there shouldn’t be a fine line between yellow and red.

ADVERTISEMENT

“A red should be an absolute, clear-cut ‘that was a red card’. Other things, then, can become yellows or penalties. What we are trying to do is trying to fill the gap, aren’t we? So you either fill the gap or put a better distinction so the gap is wider.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Fresh Starts | Episode 1 | Will Skelton

ABBIE WARD: A BUMP IN THE ROAD

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 9

James Cook | The Big Jim Show | Full Episode

New Zealand victorious in TENSE final | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Men's Highlights

New Zealand crowned BACK-TO-BACK champions | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Women's Highlights

Japan Rugby League One | Bravelupus v Steelers | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

N
Nickers 6 hours ago
All Blacks sabbaticals ‘damage Super Rugby Pacific when it is fighting for survival’

Sabbaticals have helped keep NZ’s very best talent in the country on long term deals - this fact has been left out of this article. Much like the articles calling to allow overseas players to be selected, yet can only name one player currently not signed to NZR who would be selected for the ABs. And in the entire history of NZ players leaving to play overseas, literally only 4 or 5 have left in their prime as current ABs. (Piatau, Evans, Hayman, Mo’unga,?) Yes Carter got an injury while playing in France 16 years ago, but he also got a tournament ending injury at the 2011 World Cup while taking mid-week practice kicks at goal. Maybe Jordie gets a season-ending injury while playing in Ireland, maybe he gets one next week against the Brumbies. NZR have many shortcomings, but keeping the very best players in the country and/or available for ABs selection is not one of them. Likewise for workload management - players missing 2 games out of 14 is hardly a big deal in the grand scheme of things. Again let’s use some facts - did it stop the Crusaders winning SR so many times consecutively when during any given week they would be missing 2 of their best players? The whole idea of the sabbatical is to reward your best players who are willing to sign very long term deals with some time to do whatever they want. They are not handed out willy-nilly, and at nowhere near the levels that would somehow devalue Super Rugby. In this particular example JB is locked in with NZR for what will probably (hopefully) be the best years of his career, hard to imagine him not sticking around for a couple more after for a Lions tour and one more world cup. He has the potential to become the most capped AB of all time. A much better outcome than him leaving NZ for a minimum of 3 years at the age of 27, unlikely to ever play for the ABs again, which would be the likely alternative.

3 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING All Black dropped to bench as Crusaders make six starting changes for Force All Black dropped to bench as Crusaders make six starting changes
Search