Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

'He spent most of the time on the toilet' - England verdict on inexperienced injury replacements Hill and Stuart

By Liam Heagney
(Photo by Dan Mullan/The RFU Collection via Getty Images)

Eddie Jones hasn’t got any concerns about the selection of inexperienced duo Jonny Hill and Will Stuart in the starting England pack for Saturday’s Guinness Six Nations round one encounter with Scotland at Twickenham. Second row Hill and tighthead Stuart have just four and eight caps respectively compared to the wealth of experience they are replacing, the injured Joe Launchbury (69 caps) and the suspended Kyle Sinckler (40 caps).

ADVERTISEMENT

It’s a shortfall of 97 caps but Jones believes the strides made in 2020 by Hill and Stuart have them primed for greater involvement with England, the game versus the Scots being only the second Test start for each player.   

“Both of those guys have been progressing nicely. Will Stuart is a guy that came into our squad about twelve months ago. He has worked really hard on his physical condition, he has worked hard on his scrummaging and he is an outstanding ball carrier. We are lucky to have him to start with Kyle unavailable,” said Jones. 

Video Spacer

Jonny Wilkinson and Gregor Townsend reflect on the Calcutta Cup:

Video Spacer

Jonny Wilkinson and Gregor Townsend reflect on the Calcutta Cup:

“Jonny Hill we took to South Africa in 2018. Unfortunately, he spent most of the time on the toilet. Since then he has worked really hard to build his body up. He has been consistently good for his club and he gives us that physical edge. 

“We needed that to replace a very important part of our team when George Kruis left. Jonny fills that role as the working No5 in the pack. And both of those guys are going to be ready on Saturday.”

Jones added that he didn’t take either player aside to tell them they have had made the XV. “I don’t tell them, they just find out at team selection. We only talk to the people who aren’t selected,” he explained about a selection showing four changes from the December win over France, Ollie Lawrence for George Ford and Mark Wilson for the injured Sam Underhill the other two alterations.    

“For each of the players now we work out what they need. It’s not what we need as coaches, it’s what they need and if they need a word from any of the coaches we will make sure they get them. This last 48 hours particularly we see it as the players’ time, not the coaches’ time. We just work out what they need. 

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Fresh Starts | Episode 2 | Sam Whitelock

Royal Navy Men v Royal Air Force Men | Full Match Replay

Royal Navy Women v Royal Air Force Women | Full Match Replay

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 9

James Cook | The Big Jim Show | Full Episode

New Zealand victorious in TENSE final | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Men's Highlights

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

F
Flankly 2 hours ago
The AI advantage: How the next two Rugby World Cups will be won

If rugby wants to remain interesting in the AI era then it will need to work on changing the rules. AI will reduce the tactical advantage of smart game plans, will neutralize primary attacking weapons, and will move rugby from a being a game of inches to a game of millimetres. It will be about sheer athleticism and technique,about avoiding mistakes, and about referees. Many fans will find that boring. The answer is to add creative degrees of freedom to the game. The 50-22 is an example. But we can have fun inventing others, like the right to add more players for X minutes per game, or the equivalent of the 2-point conversion in American football, the ability to call a 12-player scrum, etc. Not saying these are great ideas, but making the point that the more of these alternatives you allow, the less AI will be able to lock down high-probability strategies. This is not because AI does not have the compute power, but because it has more choices and has less data, or less-specific data. That will take time and debate, but big, positive and immediate impact could be in the area of ref/TMO assistance. The technology is easily good enough today to detect forward passes, not-straight lineouts, offside at breakdown/scrum/lineout, obstruction, early/late tackles, and a lot of other things. WR should be ultra aggressive in doing this, as it will really help in an area in which the game is really struggling. In the long run there needs to be substantial creativity applied to the rules. Without that AI (along with all of the pro innovations) will turn rugby into a bash fest.

24 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Ardie Savea's Japan sabbatical ends on a sour note Ardie Savea's Japan sabbatical ends on a sour note
Search