Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

South Africa forced to go cap in hand to World Rugby

By Online Editors
Trevor Nyakane follwoing the All Blacks' 23-13 World Cup victory over South Africa in Yokohama on Saturday. (Photo by Hannah Peters/Getty Images)

The COVID-19 pandemic has hit rugby in South Africa so badly that SA Rugby was forced into knocking on World Rugby’s door to ask for financial support. According to information from the Rapport all the large unions and even some of the smaller ones were forced into requesting an advance on the annual contributions made to them by SA Rugby.

ADVERTISEMENT

In effect, SA Rugby has gone to World Rugby and asked them for next year’s stipend now and added that to whatever savings they currently have in order to help the unions survive.

A top rugby administrator told Rapport that this is not unusual as virtually every year there are countries that request an advance.

Video Spacer

Gregor Townsend on his side tight, tight loss to France.

Video Spacer

Gregor Townsend on his side tight, tight loss to France.

“It’s dead normal. I think SA Rugby also did it in 2016. Some countries do it every year”

SA Rugby has been helping the unions with advances since March 2020 to ensure there are no fears about them being able to pay salaries.

Despite the advances the insecurities of when the unions will be allowed to open their gates to the paying public again are still there. Terrible pressure is still on the rugby bosses as to when they will be able to normalize their cash flow again.

Unfortunately, no rugby administrator that spoke to Rapport could give a firm date when the stadiums will be allowed to open their gates to the suite holders, season ticket holders and public again.

Rugby bosses are hoping that President Cyril Ramaphosa will provide them with this information soon however the expectation is that this won’t occur before early next year.

ADVERTISEMENT

The income from their suites is the third-largest source of income for the larger unions.

“The larger unions have watched the income from their suites fall over the last five years and unions are losing millions of Rands” said another administrator

“They’re struggling to find companies that are prepared to rent the suites for the prices they used to get but even if it’s 100 suites at R200,000 each it’s still R20 million that’s at risk for the larger unions”

Unions can still hold their suite leaseholder to contractual terms as they have a binding agreement in place and the lessee is still bound to honour the terms of the contacts in place.

However, if they do this, they run the risk of alienating those lessee’s and losing them the following year as they simply won’t lease the suite again.

ADVERTISEMENT

On top of the risk that the unions carry with the loss of income from the reduction in the amount of games they’ve been able to stage they also have the problem where COVID-19 has caused devastation in the economy to the point where some of the suite holders can’t even afford their current payments.

The first item on the unions budget is now entertainment in order to bring in some much-needed income.

“The only trump card the larger unions have is the upcoming B&I Lions tour where people will renew their contracts for 2021 to be able to watch this but what happens after 2021 is anybody’s guess”

Large unions are only managing to bring in about a third of what their income should be according to another administrator.

Large unions income remains critical according to a third rugby administrator. “What makes it even more difficult is that we don’t want to make empty promises regarding 2021 to our suite holders, sponsors and season ticket holders.”

“I think it’s going to take three to five years for the unions to recover from what COVID-19 has done to them this year.”

A fourth rugby administrator told Rapport that the large unions will only be able to recover from this year’s financial setbacks if they’re able to open their gates immediately in March 2021 for the start of the Pro16 series.

“The next few months are going to be critical for us” he said.

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Fresh Starts | Episode 1 | Will Skelton

ABBIE WARD: A BUMP IN THE ROAD

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 8

James Cook | The Big Jim Show | Full Episode

New Zealand victorious in TENSE final | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Men's Highlights

New Zealand crowned BACK-TO-BACK champions | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Women's Highlights

Japan Rugby League One | Steelers v Sungoliath | Full Match Replay

Rugby Europe Women's Championship | Netherlands v Spain

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

M
Mzilikazi 46 minutes ago
Swashbuckling Hurricanes and Harlequins show scrum still matters

I always enjoy a good scrum based article. Thanks, Nick. The Hurricanes are looking more and more the team to beat down here in Australasia. They are a very well balanced team. And though there are far fewer scrums in the game these days, destructive power in that area is a serious weapon, especially an attacking scrum within in the red zone. Aumua looked very good as a young first year player, but then seemed to fade. He sure is back now right in the picture for the AB’s. And I would judge that Taukei’aho is in a bit of a slump currently. Watching him at Suncorp a few weeks ago, I thought he was not as dominant in the game as I would have expected. I am going to raise an issue in that scrum at around the 13 min mark. I see a high level of danger there for the TH lifted off the ground. He is trapped between the opposition LH and his own powerful SR. His neck is being put under potentially dangerous pressure. The LH has, in law , no right to use his superior scrummaging skill….getting his head right in on the breastbone of the TH…..to force him up and off the ground. Had the TH popped out of the scrum, head up and free, there is no danger, that is a clear penalty to the dominant scrum. The law is quite clear on this issue: Law 37 Dangerous play and restricted practices in a scrum. C:Intentionally lifting an opponent off their feet or forcing them upwards out of the scrum. Sanction: Penalty. Few ,if any, referees seem to be aware of this law, and/or the dangers of the situation. Matthew Carly, refereeing Clermont v Munster in 2021, penalised the Munster scrum, when LH Wycherly was lifted very high, and in my view very dangerously, by TH Slimani. Lifting was coached in the late ‘60’s/70’s. Both Lions props, Ray McLouglin, and “Mighty Mouse” McLauchlan, were expert and highly successful at this technique. I have seen a photo, which I can’t find online atm, of MM with a NZ TH(not an AB) on his head, MM standing upright as the scrum disintegrates.

3 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE Swashbuckling Hurricanes and Harlequins show scrum still matters Swashbuckling Hurricanes and Harlequins show scrum still matters
Search