Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

Six months after demanding it open, Eddie Jones now wants the Principality roof closed

By Liam Heagney
The Principality Stadium in Cardiff. (Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images)

Saturday’s weather forecast in Cardiff isn’t predicting any rain, but England boss Eddie Jones has asked for the Principality Stadium roof to be closed when they face Wales in the second of their World Cup warm-up fixtures.

ADVERTISEMENT

Just six months ago, Jones caused an uproar by refusing to let the Welsh close the roof for the February Six Nations clash between the countries. However, with England due to play their opening two fixtures at next month’s World Cup under a closed roof, the Australian has now changed tack regarding his surroundings in Cardiff. 

England start their World Cup bid at the Sapporo Dome against Tonga on September 22 and they will also be under a roof when they take on USA in Kobe on September 26.

Jones was reported on Twitter by the RFU saying: “We’re hopeful Wales close the roof, as our first two games in Japan are under closed roofs.”

He will now hope to get his way and have Wales agree that the warm-up, which will be played in front of a capacity crowd of more than 70,000, will take place under a roof for a summer match in contrast to what happened in winter when England and Ireland forced the Welsh to open it. That resulted in the Grand Slam clincher against the Irish taking place in a constant downpour. 

Meanwhile, Leinster-bound Wales assistant Robin McBryde has spoken about the impact which Gareth Anscombe’s World Cup-ruining injury has had on the Welsh squad.  

“It is a big loss,” he told WRU TV. “He [Anscombe] has been there consistently over the last however many games on that winning streak. He has worked well and led the ship well. Any player of that calibre is going to be a loss to the squad.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Wales are due to name their team for Saturday’s match at 11am on Thursday, with England scheduled to follow suit two hours later at 1pm. 

WATCH: Eddie Jones talks to the media on Monday after confirming his 31-man squad for the World Cup

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Singapore SVNS Day 1 - Replay

Fresh Starts | Episode 3 | Cobus Reinach

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 11

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

The Breakfast Show | Episode 7

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Pacific Four Series 2024 | Canada vs USA

Japan Rugby League One | Verblitz v Eagles | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
Jon 11 hours ago
The case for keeping the Melbourne Rebels in Super Rugby Pacific

I have heard it asked if RA is essentially one of the part owners and I suppose therefor should be on the other side of these two parties. If they purchased the rebels and guaranteed them, and are responsible enough they incur Rebels penalties, where is this line drawn? Seems rough to have to pay a penalty for something were your involvement sees you on the side of the conned party, the creditors. If the Rebels directors themselves have given the club their money, 6mil worth right, why aren’t they also listed as sitting with RA and the Tax office? And the legal threat was either way, new Rebels or defunct, I can’t see how RA assume the threat was less likely enough to warrant comment about it in this article. Surely RA ignore that and only worry about whether they can defend it or not, which they have reported as being comfortable with. So in effect wouldn’t it be more accurate to say there is no further legal threat (or worry) in denying the deal. Unless the directors have reneged on that. > Returns of a Japanese team or even Argentinean side, the Jaguares, were said to be on the cards, as were the ideas of standing up brand new teams in Hawaii or even Los Angeles – crazy ideas that seemingly forgot the time zone issues often cited as a turn-off for viewers when the competition contained teams from South Africa. Those timezones are great for SR and are what will probably be needed to unlock its future (cant see it remaining without _atleast _help from Aus), day games here are night games on the West Coast of america, were potential viewers triple, win win. With one of the best and easiest ways to unlock that being to play games or a host a team there. Less good the further across Aus you get though. Jaguares wouldn’t be the same Jaguares, but I still would think it’s better having them than keeping the Rebels. The other options aren’t really realistic 25’ options, no. From reading this authors last article I think if the new board can get the investment they seem to be confident in, you keeping them simply for the amount of money they’ll be investing in the game. Then ditch them later if they’re not good enough without such a high budget. Use them to get Jaguares reintergration stronger, with more key players on board, and have success drive success.

28 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE The case for keeping the Melbourne Rebels in Super Rugby Pacific The case for keeping the Melbourne Rebels in Super Rugby Pacific
Search