Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

Sighting of Will Skelton's enormous rugby playing brother goes viral

By Ian Cameron
(Photo by Harry Murphy/Sportsfile via Getty Images)

A sighting of a giant rugby player – understood to be Will Skelton’s younger brother Cameron – has gone viral on social media.

ADVERTISEMENT

Grainy footage of the enormous second row was posted by RugbyDump in a game for a local side in New Zealand in which he towered over his opponents. While the player’s height was impressive enough, it was the sheer mass of the player and size difference with his teammates that catches the eye.

Another account on Twitter identified it as Cameron Skelton, the 6’11 brother of Wallaby Will Skelton, who was lining out for Papatoetoe Premier Men’s Development team in Auckland.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

Previous stats for the younger Skelton suggest that he weighs in at a whopping 154kg, but it is clear from the footage that he is significantly heavier at the moment and probably closer to 170 to 180kg.

RugbyPass understand that the 27-year-old – who has previously been on the margins of professional rugby – is bidding to lose weight and to take a shot at professional footie once again.

Speaking to RugbyPass on Le French Rugby Podcast recently Will Skelton spoke of his two outsized siblings: “I’ve got two younger brothers, Cameron and Logan. They’re 27 and 22 this year. I’m the smallest in the family.

“Cam is about 6’11 and Logan, the baby, is about 7’2. So they’re big boys.

“Cameron is still trying to get there. He’s just got married a month ago, so he’s trying to get back on the field. He’s played Waikato, Counties NPC and he’s slowly trying to get back into good shape to play some high level rugby.

ADVERTISEMENT

“They were really good players growing up, Cam especially. He had a contract with the Tah [Waratahs] with me back in 2014/15. He almost wanted to split to make his own way and he headed over to New Zealand.

“It could have been him and me as the locks at the Tahs, which would have been pretty cool.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Fresh Starts | Episode 1 | Will Skelton

ABBIE WARD: A BUMP IN THE ROAD

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 8

James Cook | The Big Jim Show | Full Episode

New Zealand victorious in TENSE final | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Men's Highlights

New Zealand crowned BACK-TO-BACK champions | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Women's Highlights

Japan Rugby League One | Steelers v Sungoliath | Full Match Replay

Rugby Europe Women's Championship | Netherlands v Spain

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

S
Senzo Cicero 12 hours ago
'If the South Africans are in, they need to be all in'

1. True, if that “free” ticket means access to all but the prized exhibit - EVIP only. SA cannot host semis, even if they’ve earned it (see Sharks vs ASM Clermont Auvergne at… Twickenham Stoop). 2. Why no selective outrage over Lyon doing the exact same thing a week earlier? Out of all the countries France send the most “B teams”, why nobody talking about “disrespect” and “prioritising domestic leagues” and “kicking them out”? 3. Why no mention of the Sharks fielding all of their Springboks for the second rate Challenge cup QF? No commitment? 4. Why no mention of all the SA teams qualifying for respective euro knock out comps in the two seasons they’ve been in it? How many euro teams have qualified for KO’s in their history? Can’t compete? 5. Why no mention of SA teams beating French and English giants La Rochelle and Saracens? How many euro teams have done that in their history? Add no quality? The fact is that SA teams are only in their second season in europe, with no status and a fraction of the resources. Since joining the URC, SA has seen a repatriation of a number of players, and this will only grow once SA start sharing in the profits of competing in these comps, meaning bigger squads with greater depth and quality, meaning they don’t have to prioritise comps as they have to now - they don’t have imports from Pacifica and South America and everywhere else in between like “European” teams have - also less “Saffas” in Prem and T14, that’s what we want right? 'If the South Africans are in, they need to be all in' True, and we have to ensure we give them the same status and resources as we give everyone else to do just that. A small compromise on scheduling will go a long way in avoiding these situations, but guess what, France and England wont compromise on scheduling because they ironically… prioritise their domestic comps, go figure!

19 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE How are Australian sides faring in Super Rugby Pacific? How are Australian sides faring in Super Rugby Pacific?
Search