Northern | US

Scott Robertson's loose forwards selections don't add up

Ethan Blackadder and Wallace Sititi of the All Blacks. Photo by Hannah Peters/Getty Images
Comments
110 Comments

“We’re just looking for a little bit more versatility.’’

So said All Blacks coach Scott Robertson on Monday, in trying to explain the omission of Ethan Blackadder from the 35-man squad to meet France next month.

ADVERTISEMENT

In the case of loose forward Jacobson, it’s Blackadder’s Crusaders teammate Christian Lio-Willie that is next up. That’s how far down the depth chart Blackadder obviously is.

I mention this as a way of getting to Du’Plessis Kirifi, who’s been away with the All Blacks before but is listed as a new cap now.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

It is a versatile five-man loose forward contingent if, for argument’s sake, we include the injured Jacobson. He can play all three positions in the trio, even if that’s without proving himself a first-choice selection in any.

Oh yes, it’s a versatile group of blokes all right. You’ve got Kirifi, who plays 7 and is too diminutive to play anywhere else. And you’ve got Samipeni Finau, who is an out-and-out 6.

That’s versatility right there.

I want to like Robertson. I want him to do well and for the team to do the nation proud. Life’s easier as a columnist when all you have to do is praise people.

But I’m afraid I become a little bit irritable and uncharitable when coaches start talking cobblers.

ADVERTISEMENT

Blackadder, to my eye, was the best player on the park during the Crusaders’ Super Rugby Pacific final victory over the Chiefs on Saturday. Whether at blindside
flanker, where he started the match, or on the openside where he finished it, Blackadder’s workrate and hunger for the ball shone through.

It was only matched by Tom Christie, who began the match in the 7 jersey for the home side.

Good player, Christie. Great fetcher, brave, accurate. And seemingly in no danger of ever becoming an All Black.

Perhaps he’s just not as aware of where the cameras are as Kirifi is. I’ll give Kirifi his due in that regard – few players are better at creating the impression of greatness than he is.

ADVERTISEMENT

I had to chuckle as I scanned analysis of Monday’s squad naming. One scribe crowned Kirifi as arguably the best openside in Super Rugby this year.

Never mind that Moana Pasifika’s Ardie Savea was the competition’s player of the year.

And that’s partly why I’ve banged on about this idea of versatility.

Savea is hugely versatile, having previously excelled at 6 and 8 for the All Blacks. However, it seems as if openside might become the vice-captain’s regular spot this season, as part of a trio with Wallace Sititi on the back of the scrum and Finau the blindside.

I don’t see how they can configure it any other way, really. You could go Savea at 8, Kirifi at 7 and Sititi at 6, but then your trio is so small it’s not even funny.

Lineouts options become an issue at that point, not to mention the absence of a physical threat in defence.

I discount Jacobson from the equation, regardless of fitness, because I doubt he deserves to start a game ahead of any of the others. Blackadder would, but he’s not there.

So, as I look at the guys who have been picked, I see Savea as the obvious openside. And, given his talent, influence and leadership position, he (fitness permitting) ought to play every minute of every important test match this season.

Do you carry a like-for-like replacement for him on the bench, as Kirifi would be? Or does the Hurricane just sit in the stands?

I personally prefer my bench loose forward to be more versatile, especially given Savea’s not going to be subbed off too often.

Some of this might come across as a bit snarky or personal. It’s not.

I’m merely looking at who’s been picked, who hasn’t and the justifications of the coach for those decisions. For me, they don’t add up in the loose forwards and I haven’t even gotten onto the backline yet.

That’ll have to wait for another day.

Congratulations to all 35 men who’ve made the cut. It’s a proud moment for them, their families and the many friends, teammates and coaches who’ve been with them on this journey. It remains a great honour to be named an All Black and we wish them all the best.

I just looked at the squad and felt underwhelmed and confused.

Let’s hope the performances can inspire a bit more confidence about the direction this team’s headed in.

RugbyPass App Download

News, stats, live rugby and more! Download the new RugbyPass app on the App Store (iOS) and Google Play (Android) now!


Whether you’re looking for somewhere to track upcoming fixtures, a place to watch live rugby or an app that shows you all of the latest news and analysis, the RugbyPass rugby app is perfect.

ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

110 Comments
Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

c
cnw 4 hours ago
France has conquered and reconquered Europe. Can it reach its Mount Everest?

It’s mind boggling that the best are not playing the best in July! Though the commercial reality bites here. On the B/C/D I think the issue is one of communicating ideas. You point out that in reality the majority of the players were third or fourth choice or perhaps worse. And the way you explained it as someone who clearly knows the French comp that makes sense. So I accept that it was perhaps a third or fourth choice team overall. I should be clear though I think that the quality of the team exceeded the sum of its parts. And I think a D grade is way too low. Their performance was too good to get such a grade. And I think that reflects that they are very good players who had a good chance to build combinations. Would the first choice players have played better - very likely. But that does not diminish the performance of the boys that played.

Put another way, I understand that the French team that played the Boks had a good number of first choice players in stark contrast to the teams that played in NZ. But they did not perform like an “A” team - clearly they had only got together just before that game. They started well but the lack of match readiness showed in the second half. In contrast the Boks had both their first choice team that was a battle hardened unit - and they played their A game, as they did against the ABs first choice team in Wellington. In contrast the first choice ABs beat the then first choice Boks in Auckland - it was the best performance all year by the ABs - it was an A grade performance (the Bok dominance in the forwards notwithstanding).



...

613 Go to comments
Close Panel
Close Panel

Edition & Time Zone

{{current.name}}
Set time zone automatically
{{selectedTimezoneTitle}} (auto)
Choose a different time zone
Close Panel

Editions

Close Panel

Change Time Zone

Copied to clipboard

Share Article close