Northern | US

Deep parallels to 2010 for the All Blacks ahead of South Africa

(Photos by Phil Walter/Getty Images and by Kai Schwoerer - Nations Championship/Nations Championship via Getty Images)
Comments
37 Comments

2009 was a great year for South African rugby.

It was the year they conquered everyone, from a 2-1 series win in the famous British & Irish Lions tour, to a 3-0 ‘black-wash’ over the All Blacks on the way to a Tri Nations title. After winning the Rugby World Cup in 2007, by 2009 the Boks were sailing high.

ADVERTISEMENT

The first two Tests at home against New Zealand the boot of Morne Steyn fuelled points while an uncompromising defence and kick pressure choked the All Blacks out of the games.

When the two teams arrived in Hamilton for the third and final match up of the year, the Springboks again stunned Graham Henry’s side with long range penalties and tries against the run of play to secure a 32-29 win.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

It was crisis mode for the All Blacks that triggered an introspective look at the team’s tactics, selections and operations. From a kick-heavy game in 2009, they adopted a more expansive, high-risk game with higher tempo and greater emphasis on the breakdown the next year.

16 years later, there are many parallels between then and now, with the two teams in similar predicaments.

The Springboks, riding high as the world number one after two years of dominance, are being talked up as ‘unbeatable’ once again.

The All Blacks, having only managed one win from the last four against South Africa since the last World Cup, are not being given a chance to win the upcoming series.

ADVERTISEMENT

They’ve axed the coach halfway through the cycle, installed a new playing style and staff, while also picking a host of young players to build around. Rennie has focused on building cohesion in July, sticking with key selections like Ruben Love at No.10.

By contrast the 2026 Springboks has a veteran side full of World Cup winners and a widened playing base with the most players used in July of any nation. Obsessed with building depth, the Boks boast large numbers of capped players.

But in hindsight, 2009 was the peak for the Springboks as they begun to reach the proverbial cliff.

The 2010 All Blacks actually reversed the 3-0 scoreline from the year before, beating South Africa 32-12 at Eden Park, 31-17 in Wellington and then the last-gasp 29-22 win in Johannesburg to complete the sweep with rookie fullback Israel Dagg diving over after a Ma’a Nonu break on the buzzer.

ADVERTISEMENT

The tactical improvements saw the All Blacks use greater ball movement and pace to score far more tries against the Boks than the year before.

The crop of debutants that year featured Dagg, Colin Slade, Victor Vito, Sam Whitelock, Aaron Cruden, and Sonny Bill Williams. All of whom played a key part in the 2011 Rugby World Cup victory.

The Springboks won just one game from six in the 2010 Tri-Nations, slumping to a disastrous record with an aging core. From that point on, they stumbled their way to the next Rugby World Cup and were eventually dumped out by Australia.

Few would predict that fate for the 2026 Springboks based on their current standing, but at the same point in time in the cycle towards the 2011 Rugby World Cup they were in the exact same place.

A popular war strategy from Sun Tzu in the Art of War is “when you are weak, appear strong, and when you are strong, appear weak”.

Springboks head coach Rassie Erasmus is definitely trying to appear strong in recent times.

Battling a long list of injuries ahead of the Nations Championship window, he sprung a surprise on England by naming Eben Etzbeth and Siya Kolisi to start.

Neither did play of course, with Kolisi and Etzebeth pulled from the match. Both failed to feature a single time in July. So they were “good to go” and suddenly pulled from the entire July fixtures. “When you are weak appear strong.”

Erasmus has also been offering bullish comments on his star flyhalf’s return from injury too, Sacha Feinberg-Mngomezulu, aiming for a return against Argentina one month earlier than the original timeframe. What’s the bet he’s named to play and pulled from the line-up just like Etzebeth and Kolisi?

Kolisi’s replacement Paul de Villers played all three games and took to Test Rugby like a duck to water. The Springboks of course were playing the two worst Six Nations teams, Wales and England, and ended up being outplayed by Scotland with the defence conceding a whopping 15 line breaks. De Villiers, like many others, looked like a rock stars against the bottom half of the Six Nations.

The Springboks were officially the slowest team in all the Nations Championship fixtures in July.

Opta confirmed their ruck speed at a pedestrian 4.23 seconds per ruck in July, the lowest of the 12 nations. New Zealand came in third with 2.95 seconds behind France (2.93) and Ireland (2.91). Yet when starter Cam Roigard was on the field, the All Blacks clocked 2.90 seconds per ruck which would best Ireland’s mark.

The Springboks are playing a slow game. The All Blacks want to play at lightening speed. This will be the struggle of the series, who controls the tempo.

The 2010 All Blacks successfully evolved their game and Rennie’s side in 2026 is trying to do the same. The man who orchestrated that 2010 revival, Graham Henry, is back on the All Blacks selection panel.

Erasmus is trying to look strong while actually being depleted of his aging veterans. History might not repeat but it does rhyme, and it feels a bit like 2010 in 2026.

 

 

Register your interest to receive priority updates on RWC27 ticket releases. Don't miss out, stay in the loop!


ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

37 Comments
R
RC 45 days ago

ABs 3-1.


The return to the rightful order in world rugby 🏉


All Blacks - Bride

Boks - Bridesmaids


🤔

P
PickOllieMathisOrKeepLosing,Rob. 45 days ago

Interesting theory. Where it falls down is when I watch the Springboks play.

If they are weak appearing strong then holy jesus are we in trouble if they actually get strong.

I have heard many interviews with springboks from the 09-2011 era and all of them talk about how that team stayed still instead of evolving.

Erasmus has made no such mistake and I find it a bit of a stretch to argue otherwise.

The All Blacks are capable of winning the series, but I dont see allot of parallels to 2010 personally.

W
Wayneo 45 days ago

Yes mate, everyone is in trouble because the Springboks are not even close to their full potential yet.


I mentioned after the loss to the Ausies in Joburg last year that what I saw in those first 20 minute should be enough to scare the life out of everybody who is not South African.


What the Boks showed there was what they were capable of when the play total rugby merging their physical with an intelligent running game.


IMO, what we are seeing is only the beginning of a golden erra for South African rugby.

J
Jordon 45 days ago

The amount of optimism coming from the nz media and rugby public is starting to get a little nauseating.


There is also so much emphasis on ruck speed throughout the course of the game. In case anyone needs reminding, the hurricanes blew the super rugby apart this year with only the 8th fastest ruck speed in the competition, and 35th across all comps. Test rugby is of course not super rugby. But an extra second at the base of the ruck not only let’s the defense set, but it allows a player on the attacking team to also move positions and create a different opportunity than was first presented. The hurricanes showed this all season by balancing fast ruck speed with better decision making.

M
MM 44 days ago

How dare anyone suggest the ABs might be just a wee bit competitive this year! Just rude…….

H
Hammer Head 45 days ago

Starts well and then turns to a ball of turd.

H
HS 46 days ago

New Zealand came in third in ruck speeds with 2.95 seconds, behind France (2.93) and Ireland (2.91), yet New Zealand beat both of them.


I see deep parallels to last month for the All Blacks ahead of South Africa: it is almost inevitable that the team with the slower ruck speed wins.

P
POHM 46 days ago

That’s the the worst analysis i have seen for a while, because the Boks are slowest by a country mile that means they will win? more likely their experience of playing together for years under the same coach will give them the win.

Still, it was a good bit of sarcasm i hope.

H
HS 46 days ago

The All Blacks are looking to great-grandfather Ted to do what he did a couple of generations ago. Not sure whether that's a sign of strength?

B
Bazzallina 45 days ago

Do you not believe in the wisdom of your elders? he ain’t the coach he is officially a selector but really he is there as just a wise old head to challenge Rennie to help bring clarity when needed to bounce ideas off etc…Ted might be Galapagos tortoise old but if you know his story he has been able to adapt and change with the times both technically and emotionally his ability to learn and change is one of his key strengths that doesn’t just go away with age …did you hear after accepting the job over the phone what Ted wanted to do straight away with Rennie?

Q
Quincy79 46 days ago

Ben Smith has written this article as if he’s discovered a secret historical code: Springboks strong in 2009 → All Blacks rebound in 2010 → therefore Springboks decline in 2026. By that logic, every team that wins a World Cup should immediately start planning its funeral because something similar once happened sixteen years ago.

The funniest part is how every piece of evidence is interpreted in the direction the article already wants to go.


South Africa rotates 40+ players? Aging side in decline.

Young players perform well? Only because the opposition was weak.

Senior players are managed carefully? Rassie is pretending to be strong.

The team plays a slower tactical game? Pedestrian rugby.

The team keeps winning? Apparently still a warning sign.


That’s not analysis; that’s a conclusion looking for supporting quotes.


And the Scotland section is pure gold. A heavily rotated July side concedes line breaks and suddenly we’re supposed to believe the rush defence is cracking and the empire is wobbling. If New Zealand had won a July game with a new coach, new flyhalf and experimental combinations, we’d be reading about “green shoots,” “evolution,” and “the foundations of the next great All Black era.”


The Opta ruck-speed stat is treated like the final revelation. Ben Smith seems to assume that the team with the fastest ruck ball automatically wins rugby matches. If that were true, South Africa’s trophy cabinet would be empty and everyone would be building statues of stopwatch operators.


And the Sun Tzu angle deserves special recognition. Eben Etzebeth and Siya Kolisi are withdrawn from a Test, and suddenly Ben Smith is presenting Rassie Erasmus as a tactical illusionist hiding a crumbling squad behind smoke and mirrors. International teams make late fitness calls every single season, but when South Africa does it, apparently we’re reading The Art of War: Shark Tank Edition.


The biggest problem with the comparison is that the 2010 Springboks had a relatively narrow player base and struggled to regenerate. The 2026 Springboks have spent years building depth so aggressively that people now complain they rotate too many players. South Africa is somehow being criticized for the very thing that was supposed to prevent another 2010.


Ben Smith’s entire article argues that 2026 is like 2010 because South Africa is relying on veterans. But the strongest evidence he presents is that South Africa has developed so much depth that newcomers can step into Test rugby immediately.


So which is it, Ben?


Are the Springboks an aging team living off old heroes, or are they a team producing too many competent replacements?


Because your article tries to prove they are both at the same time.

H
Hammer Head 45 days ago

To be fair, he doesn’t have anything else to offer as far as rugby journalism or punditry is concerned. He has resigned himself to being a formula, wrapped in a parody.

W
Westy 46 days ago

I love reading your piece Quincy79 - excellent analysis.

J
Jacque 46 days ago

Your articles really suck man 😂

NZ got hammered by the English & Wales put 26 on them.

B
Bazzallina 45 days ago

Meh Boks had 30 something put on them straight by Oz at home doesn’t mean they ain’t the best in the world just means they ain’t perfect and if you don’t get things right you can be exposed

R
Rugby 101 - Ed Pye 45 days ago

yeah and they dropped the coach and have a whole different game plan now - as Nick is pointing out

S
SB 46 days ago

Living in the past is not good.

P
PMcD 46 days ago

Hope springs eternal for you Ben but I usually find it’s better to focus on your own strengths, rather than wishing for the downfall of others. . . . In the words of the Great Nigel Owens “This is not soccer” my friend.


I’m glad Wales & England are the weakest teams in the Six Nations, technically correct but you also appear to have conveniently forgotten that one of them beat you last Autumn, which you appear to have missed in your article. 🤣🤣


Rennie has clearly improved the AB’s since then and they are heading in the right direction but you may need to keep an element of realism into your assessment this summer. 👍

W
Wayneo 46 days ago

It must be tough being a Kiwi rugby pundit in 2026. The days of watching the All Blacks steamroll the planet by 40 points at Eden Park are firmly in the rearview mirror.


So, what do you do when your team loses three of the last four games against your ultimate rivals? If you are BS, you don’t look at the scoreboard, you dust off the DeLorean and drag us all back to 2010.


In a dazzling display of mental gymnastics, BS hypothesizes that because the Springboks collapsed 16 years ago, the exact same thing is happening right now. It is a heartwarming piece of narrative comfort, utterly divorced from reality.


BS goes on to quote The Art of War (when you are weak, appear strong) because Rassie Erasmus rested Siya Kolisi and Eben Etzebeth against a rebuilding England. To Smith, squad rotation isn't the luxury of a deep rugby empire; it’s a desperate cry for help. By this logic, leaving your sports car in the garage to drive the family SUV doesn't protect an asset….it means you're bankrupt.


In a move that smacks of desperation, BS brings out the Opta stats, noting with absolute horror that the Springboks clocked a pedestrian 4.23-second ruck speed in July.


Someone needs to gently whisper in his ear that the Springboks DON”T CARE!!!


Their game plan is not a TikTok video set to double speed; it is an attritional, suffocating machine designed to turn human beings into dust. Comparing South Africa's ruck speed to New Zealand's is like criticizing a monster truck for having a lower top speed than a Honda Civic. One is built for a racetrack; the other is built to crush cars.


I laughed when reading his claims that the 2026 Boks are facing an aging cliff, yet, in a spectacular moment of self-sabotage, he admits that young replacement Paul de Villiers took to Test rugby like a duck to water.


You cannot have it both ways, Ben.


Is the squad a decaying graveyard or a conveyor belt of world-class prodigies?


By the way, and for the record Ben, the 2010 Boks collapsed because they had no backup plan. The 2026 Boks have a backup plan for their backup plan's backup plan.


Ultimately, this article reads like soebody trying to manifest a victory through sheer willpower. Suggesting the back-to-back world champions are secretly weak based on a 16-year-old trivia stat is the rugby equivalent of checking the weather report from 2010 to see if you need an umbrella today.


But hey, if fairy-tale history helps you sleep before a brutal tour in the Republic, who are we to wake you up?

J
Jordon 45 days ago

Not really. Most of us understand that nothing lasts forever and that the rugby landscape is very different from when that team started to assemble 20 years ago. We still produce some of the best coaches in the world, and some of the best players. And as much as we have fallen, we still beat everyone regularly except for you guys. And if we win the first match in joburg, a big if, we'll be back to number 1. Not all of us are as delusional as BS though.

H
Hammer Head 45 days ago

I hate to say it Wayneo, but I don’t think Ben deserves more than a 300 character response.

B
Bazzallina 46 days ago

He makes some good comparisons tho Wayneo but he also clearly state that this does not mean history will repeat itself as I remember the Boks def had the wood on us and that kicking game basically ended a few ABs wingers careers and stifled some from even starting you are dead right with the back up plan comment tho as for the injured Boks and guys who not been playing it’s something that can be seen as a lil chink whether it plays out that way nobody knows I kind of feel he acknowledges that it still seems slightly improbable why he brings up the duck to water …my gut feeling on the age issue well Father Time is undefeated so at some time it will

happen but probs not yet

G
GF 46 days ago

Stop winding up our South African cousins!

L
Lou Cifer 46 days ago

Time will tell Bin😉

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

Close Panel
Close Panel

Edition & Time Zone

{{current.name}}
Set time zone automatically
{{selectedTimezoneTitle}} (auto)
Choose a different time zone
Close Panel

Editions

Close Panel

Change Time Zone

Close
ADVERTISEMENT
Copied to clipboard

Share Article close