'Rugby is miles behind in recognising barriers that stop women progressing in top coaching roles'
As Simon Middleton prepares to leave his role as England head coach, there are increasing calls for his successor to be a woman.
At the weekend, Sunday Times writer, Stephen Jones, who has a long pedigree reporting on the women’s game, suggested that current Ealing Trailfinders Women’s Director of Rugby Giselle Mather should be the front runner, while the Telegraph among others have produced lists of suitably qualified women who could fill what I consider to be the best job in women’s rugby.
Backed by a union which has invested harder and faster than anyone else in its women’s programme; supported by the development of players in the world’s leading club league and boosted by the fact that England will host the World Cup in 2025 and all of the profile that will bring – this is surely a job that will be widely coveted.
England hiring a woman for the job would certainly be historic and a sign of how far the game has come.
When Middleton was given the role in 2015, arguably there was no female candidate (or at least few) in England with the required level of experience for the job – now there are several.
But despite all this, rugby is still miles behind sports like football in recognising the barriers that have stopped more women progressing in top coaching roles and taking active steps to remove them.
World Rugby’s female coach internship programme has accelerated the development of several women now climbing the ranks, like Harlequins’ Amy Turner, New Zealand’s Whitney Hansen and the Scottish Thistles’ Claire Cruikshank, but this work is still in its early stages and there are still scant opportunities for women to take on top international coaching roles.
When the debate plays out on social media about these jobs, and when people suggest, rightly of course, that they should simply go to the best candidates available, the underlying suggestion is that these are men and that there is more value to be placed on the experience that these men bring from coaching in the men’s game.
This point ignores of course the fact that women for so long have simply not been given the opportunity to become the ‘best candidates available’.
Take for example the fact that men have for eons had a dual pathway into coaching – that is, there are ample opportunities for them to coach men and women.
Women, on the other hand, rarely get the opportunity to coach men, which is why it is such a big story when it happens.
With more value placed on coaching in men’s rugby, you can see one immediate blocker to the progress of female coaches.
Another argument often made as to why so few women coach in men’s sport is because they cannot possibly understand a game they haven’t themselves played or experienced. If this was true, then women would be dominating the coaching of women’s sports – yet they are not.
Carol Isherwood, who is doing so much good work in this area, speaks smartly about the work going on to equalise opportunities so that there is a cohort of women experienced and confident enough not just to apply for top roles, but to have a fair shot at getting them.
Middleton himself recently called for there to be women involved in some capacity in the national team setup when he is gone, and this for me is where the real debate should be happening.
In international rugby there is still a shocking absence of women within coaching teams in any role.
It cannot be right that at the last World Cup in New Zealand there were just three women in permanent coaching roles – Whitney Hansen (New Zealand), Leslie Mckenzie (Japan) and Gaelle Mignot (France).
This lack of gender diversity within coaching teams is a problem for several reasons, but two in particular for me.
The first one is obvious. It’s become increasingly accepted that more diverse workforces make for more successful outcomes in business. Sport should be no different.
There are brilliant men coaching in rugby, but it is arrogant to assume that coaching teams wouldn’t benefit from the voices and experience of people with different backgrounds, and from styles and skills which were honed on different pathways.
Gender diversity is not the only challenge to tackle here by the way, especially when you consider the vast majority of coaching appointments at the top of women’s rugby go to white men.
The second issue relates to the huge talent and experience the women’s game is haemorrhaging when our top players retire.
That so few leading international players have gone into coaching should be cause for alarm. There are myriad reasons for this, but one absolutely is the lack of precedent and lack of blueprint for how it should be done.
This doesn’t happen in men’s rugby, where players often retire one day, and move into top coaching roles the next.
So no, England don’t have to hire a woman to be their next head coach, but they, and everyone else in the market for new coaches in the game should commit to hiring a balanced and diverse coaching team, where women’s voices are not just an add on to the package, but a vital and permanent fixture.
Comments on RugbyPass
No surprise there. How hard can it be to pick a ball off the ground and chuck it to a mate? 😂
2 Go to commentsSometimes people just like a moan mate!
1 Go to commentsexcellent idea ! rugby needs this 💪
9 Go to comments9 Brumbies! What a joke! The best performing team in Oz! Ditch Skelton for Swain or Neville. Ryan Lonergan ahead of McDermott any day! Best selection bolter is Toole … amazing player
12 Go to commentsI like this, but ultimately rugby already has enough trophies. Trying to make more games “consequential" might prove to be a fools errand, although this is a less bad idea than some others. Minor quibble with the title of the article; it isn’t very meaningful to say the boks are the unofficial world champions when it would be functionally impossible for the Raeburn trophy not to be held by the world champions. There’s a period of a few months every 4 years when there is no “unofficial” world champion, and the Raeburn trophy is held by the actual world champions.
9 Go to commentsIts a great idea but one that I dont think will have a lot of traction. It will depend on the prestige that they each hold but if you can do that it would be great. When Japan beat the Boks (my team) I was absolutely devestated but I wont deny the great game they played that day. We were outclassed and it was one of the best games of rugby I have seen. Using an idea like this you might just give the the underdog teams more of an opportunity to beat the big teams and I can absolutely see it being a brilliant display of rugby. They beat us because they planned for that game. It was a great moment for Japan. This way we can remove the 4 year wait and give teams something to aim for outside of World Cup years.
9 Go to commentsHi, Dave here. Happy to answer questions 🥰
9 Go to commentsDon’t think that headline is accurate. It’s great to see Aus doing better but I’m not sure they’ve shown much threat to the top of the table. They shouldn’t be inflating wins against the lousy Highlanders and Crusaders either.
3 Go to commentsSuch a shame Roigard and Aumua picked up long term injuries, probably the two form players in the comp. Also, pretty sure Clarke Dermody isn’t their coach. Got it half right though.
3 Go to commentsOh the Aussie media, they never learn. At least Andrew Kellaway is like “Woah, yeah it’s great, but settle down there guys” having endured years of the Aussie media, fans, and often their players getting ahead of themselves only to fall flat on their faces. Have the “We'll win the Bledisloe for sure this year!” headlines started yet? It’s simple to see what’s going on. The Aussie teams are settled, they didn't lose any of their major players overseas. The Crusaders and Chiefs lost key experienced All Blacks, and Razor in the Crusaders case, and clearly neither are anywhere near as strong as last year (The Canes and Blues would probably be 3rd & 4th if they were). The Highlanders are annually average, even more so post-Aaron Smith and a big squad clean out. The two teams at the top? The two nz sides with largely the same settled roster as last year, except Ardie Savea for the Canes. They’ve both got far better coaches now too. If the Aussies are going to win the title, this is the year the kiwi sides will be weakest, so they better take their chance.
3 Go to commentsThe World Cup has to be the gold standard, line in the sand. 113 teams compete for what is the opportunity to make the pool stages, and then the knockout games for the trophy. The concept is sound. This must have been the rationale when the World Cup was created, surely? But I’m all for Looking forward and finding new ways for the SH to dominate the NH into the future. The autumn series needs a change up. Let’s start by having the NH teams come south every odd year for the Autumn/Spring series games?
9 Go to commentsWhat’ll happen when the AI models of the future go back in time and try to destroy the AI models of the past standing in their way of certain victory?
41 Go to commentsThanks, Nick. We (Seanny Maloney, Brett and I) just discussed Charlie as a potential Wallaby No 8, and wondered if he has truly realised how big he is in contact (and whether he can add 5 kg w/o slowing down). Your scouting report confirms our suspicions he has the materiel. No one knows if he has the mentality (as Johann van Graan said this week about CJ, Duane and Alfie B) to carry 10-15 times a game.
57 Go to commentsHe would be a great player for the Stormers, Dobbo should approach the guy.
3 Go to commentsGood article. A few years back when he was playing for the Cheetahs, he was a quiet standout for exactly the seasons stated here. I occasionally get to see his games in the UK, and he has become a more complete player and in many ways like an Irish player. His work ethic is so suitable to the Leinster game. I wonder if Rassie would have him listed somewhere.
3 Go to commentsResults probably skewed by the fact that a few clubs have foreign fly halves in their 30s, but most teams have young English scrum halves. Results also likely to be skewed by the fact that many teams rely on centres and fullbacks to provide depth at 10, whereas they will need to stock a large number of specialist backup 9s.
2 Go to commentsI really get the sense that when all is said and done, the path of least resistance will end up being a merger of Wasps & Worcester that essentially kills the Worcester Warriors brand and sees Wasps permanently playing at Sixways. I’m not saying that’s what should happen or what I want to happen. I just think it’s the easiest rout to take and therefore, will be what happens. Wasps will definitely return to play first, and I suppose it all depends on if they can find support at Sixways. If people turn up and support Wasps in that community, at that ground, I bet they drop the Sevenoaks plan and just remain at Sixways. Under the radar but not totally unrelated, it looks as though London Irish are going to be brought back from the dead by a German consortium and look set to return, likely to the remade Championship. It’s set to have 12 clubs next season with 14 in 2025/26, what do you want to bet those extra 2 are Wasps and London Irish?
3 Go to commentsThe shoulder is a “joint” with multiple bones. You don’t “fracture” a shoulder, you fracture any one or more of the bones that make up a shoulder.
2 Go to commentsOh dear, bones too suspect to continue?
2 Go to commentsBold headline considering the Canes and Blues are 1 and 2 and the Brumbies were soundly beaten by the Chiefs and Blues. Biggest surprise is Rebels 4 Crusaders 12 - no one saw that coming. If Aus are improving that’s great 👍
3 Go to comments