Northern | US

Reds’ Josh Flook ‘happy’ to play through pain as Wallaby jersey beckons

(Photo by Asanka Ratnayake/Getty Images)
Comments
Comment

Josh Flook has backed himself to play through the pain as a Wallabies jersey beckons and the Queensland Reds plot a road-trip to the Super Rugby Pacific title.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Reds’ No.13 has fought through an AC joint injury suffered against Moana Pasifika last month, rested from two of the side’s past five games in an attempt to manage the ailment.

The 22-year-old wincing in pain and grabbing at his shoulder after a tackle or fall has been a regular sight in the past month, but Flook has no plans to rest again and is confident the complaint will subside without surgery.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

“I’m not very good at just sitting back and watching, but it was probably needed just at this time of year, a little refresher,,” he said of missing the Reds’ last-round loss in Fiji.

“I’m happy to play through a bit of pain if you can help your mates beside you.

“But to chill for the week and refresh, that’s really helped.”

Flook was part of the Wallabies’ extended squad that was narrowed down before last year’s World Cup.

He thinks his game has matured since then as he eyes a potential Test debut against Wales in July.

The depth at No.12 is strong, but there are fewer options for the Wallabies in the position outside of that.

ADVERTISEMENT

World Cup No.13 Jordan Petaia (shoulder) is injured, while Waratahs gun Izaia Perese has signed to play in England next year.

Brumbies No.13 Len Ikitau is an obvious contender, but the all-round skill set of Flook and his partnership with the rampaging Hunter Paisami is a compelling option.

“Yeah, you want to be able to take that step at some stage,” Flook said.

“I’ve matured as a player, have a bit more of a leadership role and started to find my voice, and … he (Paisami) is one of the best players in the comp at the moment, makes my life easier.”

ADVERTISEMENT

The 22-year-old is set for his 50th Super game in Saturday’s penultimate regular-season round, against Western Force in Brisbane.

Winger Suliasi Vunivalu will miss the clash, copping a one-game suspension after his pair of trips earnt him a red card against the Drua.

Victory would lock in fifth place and a knockout quarter-final against the Chiefs in New Zealand, while also jeopardising the ninth-placed Force’s own finals hopes.

The Reds beat the Crusaders in Christchurch this season for the first time since 1999, beat the Chiefs in Brisbane and have lost games to the Blues, Hurricanes and Brumbies by a converted try or less.

“We just want to do the best we can,” Flook said.

“We’ve set no markers, but we’ve had some good games against (top-four sides) the Blues, Hurricanes, Brumbies and Chiefs.

“If you have a good game on the day, you know you’re going to go close.

“If we go across there (to New Zealand) we’ll take on that competition and love it.”

ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

N
Nickers 17 minutes ago
'Entirely different to what the referees asked for': All Blacks assistant on South African TV director's influence

That is completely untrue. The broadcaster controlling the big screen shows whatever they want completely independent of the referee or TMO. When the referee requested to see something on the big screen, the broadcaster controls it, not the TMO. The TMO does not control the TV replays in these games. I went to the ABs game in Paris in 2024 and the big screen was constantly showing replays of ABs infringements. Not once did they show anything the other way. Likewise I went to France vs Ireland earlier this year and France won convincingly but honestly the big screen at the ground was worth 14 points for France. I was a neutral for that game, and in fact probably cheering for France, but it was disgraceful. Totally fair if it works both ways in the same game, but siting an example from 15 years ago seems a bit desperate. I am saying the call was right. Roigard was offside. But if only one team benefits from constant replays, regardless of which team is benefiting, then it is unfair. Where are the replays of Marx crawling over the try line? - not shown at all at the ground. How painful was it to get the replay of the high shot on Barrett? Listen to it over again, the TMO had to keep requesting different angles, it was not freeze framed at any point, and it was not shown live at the ground after the incident. The only reason it was checked is because Barrett didn’t get up afterwards. Defend it all you like while it benefits you I guess.

52 Go to comments
Close Panel
Close Panel

Edition & Time Zone

{{current.name}}
Set time zone automatically
{{selectedTimezoneTitle}} (auto)
Choose a different time zone
Close Panel

Editions

Close Panel

Change Time Zone

Close
ADVERTISEMENT
Copied to clipboard

Share Article close