PRO14 set for expansion after South Africa vote, but it isn't good news for the Cheetahs
A special general meeting of the SARU voted on Tuesday to explore entering four teams into an expanded PRO Rugby competition as well as retaining a place in a revised SANZAAR competition. The four South Africa teams voted to potentially make the transition to the PRO14 were the existing Super Rugby franchises – the Bulls, the Lions, the Sharks and the Stormers.
The decision was taken by the 13 voting member unions of SARU at a specially convened meeting to determine international participation and competition formats in a Covid-impacted rugby environment. The Border Rugby Union – which is under administration – currently has its voting powers suspended.
The meeting rejected the first option of remaining in a PRO14 format and leaving four franchises to engage in potential successor SANZAAR domestic formats. SA Rugby will now accelerate preliminary conversations with PRO Rugby Championship regarding South African representation in the competition, a joint venture between the rugby unions of Ireland, Wales, Scotland and Italy.
The general meeting also opted to continue conversations with SANZAAR about entering a team into a modified Super Series format on the proviso that a commercial model is developed to make their entry cost neutral at least once agreement had been reached with SANZAAR.
The meeting agreed that the Toyota Cheetahs would be proposed as the South African entry to such a competition. With the Southern Kings already in voluntary liquidation, that would see the four South African Super Rugby teams replace the two current South Africa PRO14 teams and turn the European tournament into a PRO16.
Storm clouds ahead as the Cheetahs refuse to go gently into that good night. https://t.co/YAnTkv8Ge2
— RugbyPass (@RugbyPass) September 27, 2020
SA Rugby chairman Jurie Roux said the meeting and options had been presented as a response to the Covid-19 pandemic and the unilateral decision by the New Zealand Rugby Union to proceed with a domestic or trans-Tasman competition.
Roux said New Zealand’s decision made it impossible to deliver the 14-team Super Rugby competition that had been agreed by the partners and for which five-year broadcasting agreements had been signed.
“Our members are excited about the prospect of closer alignment with PRO Rugby Championship and seeking a northern hemisphere future, but we would not have been taking this decision but for actions elsewhere,” said Roux.
In a second decision, the meeting determined the domestic and Currie Cup formats for 2021. It will feature two competitions:
- SA Cup (working title): All unions (14) will be divided into two pools on historic log standings and contest a single-round competition to identify eight teams for a knockout stage of quarter-finals, semi-finals and final.
- Currie Cup: The four mooted PRO Rugby Championship franchises plus the top four non-franchise qualifiers from the SA Cup would contest the Currie Cup Premier Division over a double-round with semi-final and final. The bottom six SA Cup teams contest the Currie Cup First Division in a single-round competition before semi-final and final.
SA Rugby president Mark Alexander added: “These are extraordinary times, if this had been an ordinary year, we would not have had this meeting,” he said. “But we needed to take radical steps to avoid financial meltdown because of the Covid-19 crisis.”
Roux said that SA Rugby remained committed to the SANZAAR partnership and participation in the Castle Lager Rugby Championship. “We will advise our SANZAAR partners of the general meeting’s decision. We remain part of the joint venture and will pursue the Super Series discussions in good faith.”
A lot of players have suddenly found themselves unpaid and left without a job in one of the most challenging times in a generation.
Sign up to our mailing list for a weekly digest from the wide world of rugby.Sign Up Now