Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

PRO14 set for expansion after South Africa vote, but it isn't good news for the Cheetahs

By Online Editors
(Photo by Hagen Hopkins/Getty Images)

A special general meeting of the SARU voted on Tuesday to explore entering four teams into an expanded PRO Rugby competition as well as retaining a place in a revised SANZAAR competition. The four South Africa teams voted to potentially make the transition to the PRO14 were the existing Super Rugby franchises – the Bulls, the Lions, the Sharks and the Stormers.

ADVERTISEMENT

The decision was taken by the 13 voting member unions of SARU at a specially convened meeting to determine international participation and competition formats in a Covid-impacted rugby environment. The Border Rugby Union – which is under administration – currently has its voting powers suspended.

The meeting rejected the first option of remaining in a PRO14 format and leaving four franchises to engage in potential successor SANZAAR domestic formats. SA Rugby will now accelerate preliminary conversations with PRO Rugby Championship regarding South African representation in the competition, a joint venture between the rugby unions of Ireland, Wales, Scotland and Italy.

Video Spacer

Schalk Brits stars in Bringing Home Gold, the RugbyPass review of the 2019 World Cup won by South Africa

Video Spacer

Schalk Brits stars in Bringing Home Gold, the RugbyPass review of the 2019 World Cup won by South Africa

The general meeting also opted to continue conversations with SANZAAR about entering a team into a modified Super Series format on the proviso that a commercial model is developed to make their entry cost neutral at least once agreement had been reached with SANZAAR. 

The meeting agreed that the Toyota Cheetahs would be proposed as the South African entry to such a competition. With the Southern Kings already in voluntary liquidation, that would see the four South African Super Rugby teams replace the two current South Africa PRO14 teams and turn the European tournament into a PRO16.

SA Rugby chairman Jurie Roux said the meeting and options had been presented as a response to the Covid-19 pandemic and the unilateral decision by the New Zealand Rugby Union to proceed with a domestic or trans-Tasman competition.

Roux said New Zealand’s decision made it impossible to deliver the 14-team Super Rugby competition that had been agreed by the partners and for which five-year broadcasting agreements had been signed.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Our members are excited about the prospect of closer alignment with PRO Rugby Championship and seeking a northern hemisphere future, but we would not have been taking this decision but for actions elsewhere,” said Roux.

In a second decision, the meeting determined the domestic and Currie Cup formats for 2021. It will feature two competitions:

  • SA Cup (working title): All unions (14) will be divided into two pools on historic log standings and contest a single-round competition to identify eight teams for a knockout stage of quarter-finals, semi-finals and final.
  • Currie Cup: The four mooted PRO Rugby Championship franchises plus the top four non-franchise qualifiers from the SA Cup would contest the Currie Cup Premier Division over a double-round with semi-final and final. The bottom six SA Cup teams contest the Currie Cup First Division in a single-round competition before semi-final and final.

SA Rugby president Mark Alexander added: “These are extraordinary times, if this had been an ordinary year, we would not have had this meeting,” he said. “But we needed to take radical steps to avoid financial meltdown because of the Covid-19 crisis.”

Roux said that SA Rugby remained committed to the SANZAAR partnership and participation in the Castle Lager Rugby Championship. “We will advise our SANZAAR partners of the general meeting’s decision. We remain part of the joint venture and will pursue the Super Series discussions in good faith.”

A lot of players have suddenly found themselves unpaid and left without a job in one of the most challenging times in a generation.

Posted by RugbyPass on Sunday, 27 September 2020

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Fresh Starts | Episode 1 | Will Skelton

ABBIE WARD: A BUMP IN THE ROAD

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 9

James Cook | The Big Jim Show | Full Episode

New Zealand victorious in TENSE final | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Men's Highlights

New Zealand crowned BACK-TO-BACK champions | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Women's Highlights

Japan Rugby League One | Bravelupus v Steelers | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

E
Ed the Duck 4 hours ago
How Leinster neutralised 'long-in-the-tooth' La Rochelle

Hey Nick, your match analysis is decent but the top and tail not so much, a bit more random. For a start there’s a seismic difference in regenerating any club side over a test team. EJ pretty much had to urinate with the appendage he’d been given at test level whereas club success is impacted hugely by the budget. Look no further than Boudjellal’s Toulon project for a perfect example. The set ups at La Rochelle and Leinster are like chalk and cheese and you are correct that Leinster are ahead. Leinster are not just slightly ahead though, they are light years ahead on their plans, with the next gen champions cup team already blooded, seasoned and developing at speed from their time manning the fort in the URC while the cream play CC and tests. They have engineered a strong talent conveyor belt into their system, supported by private money funnelled into a couple of Leinster private schools. The really smart move from Leinster and the IRFU however is maximising the Irish Revenue tax breaks (tax relief on the best 10 years earnings refunded at retirement) to help keep all of their stars in Ireland and happy, while simultaneously funding marquee players consistently. And of course Barrett is the latest example. But in no way is he a “replacement for Henshaw”, he’s only there for one season!!! As for Rob Baxter, the best advice you can give him is to start lobbying Parliament and HMRC for a similar state subsidy, but don’t hold your breath… One thing Cullen has been very smart with is his coaching team. Very quickly he realised his need to supplement his skills, there was talk of him exiting after his first couple of years but he was extremely shrewd bringing in Lancaster and now Nienaber. That has worked superbly and added a layer that really has made a tangible difference. Apart from that you were bang on the money… 😉😂

5 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Scotland dealt double injury blow as Bath issue Finn Russell update Scotland dealt double injury blow as Bath issue Finn Russell update
Search