Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

Parramatta Eels split over why shock loss to the Bulldogs

By AAP
(Photo by Matt King/Getty Images)

Parramatta’s leading names are divided over what contributed to their capitulation to Canterbury on Monday that handed the Bulldogs their biggest upset of the NRL season.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Bulldogs played the Eels off the park on Monday to claim a 34-4 victory and lift themselves off bottom place on the table.

Former Parramatta assistant coach Mick Potter masterminded the win, securing his first victory as interim head coach of the Bulldogs to leave Eels boss Brad Arthur scratching his head.

Related

The Eels have beaten competition heavyweights Penrith and Melbourne away this season, but also lost to the Wests Tigers on Easter Monday and the Bulldogs when both sides were at the bottom of the ladder.

“I think it’s an attitude thing, going into the game and thinking it’s going to come easily. Hopefully we’ve learned from our lessons,” said halfback Mitchell Moses.

“It’s more of an attitude thing and not trying to do individual things by yourself.

“When we play the top teams our 1 to 17 is on fire and against the teams everyone is expecting us to beat everyone is trying to do their own thing.”

Moses insists the Dogs didn’t get under Parramatta’s skin.

ADVERTISEMENT

His comments were in contrast to hooker Reed Mahoney, who claimed the Eels fell apart because they weren’t willing to stay patient after having a try chalked off in the opening 10 minutes.

“It’s not an attitude problem, it just wasn’t our day and we didn’t turn up,” he said.

“It happened once before when we came up against the Tigers. The good thing is we have talked about it and we can put it away now.

“It’s things early in the game where we flow pretty quickly, we didn’t have intent or patience with the ball and they capitalised on it.

“I wouldn’t say any team is lower than us, we need to treat every team with respect and turn up.”

ADVERTISEMENT

The Eels currently sit in sixth spot and face the Roosters at Commbank Stadium on Saturday.

“We’re excited, they’re a quality side and they got away from us at Suncorp Stadium,” Mahoney added. “You’ve got to start fast with them and do our team actions and the rest will come.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 11

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Pacific Four Series 2024 | Canada vs USA

Japan Rugby League One | Verblitz v Eagles | Full Match Replay

Fresh Starts | Episode 2 | Sam Whitelock

Royal Navy Men v Royal Air Force Men | Full Match Replay

Royal Navy Women v Royal Air Force Women | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
Jon 9 hours ago
The case for keeping the Melbourne Rebels in Super Rugby Pacific

I have heard it asked if RA is essentially one of the part owners and I suppose therefor should be on the other side of these two parties. If they purchased the rebels and guaranteed them, and are responsible enough they incur Rebels penalties, where is this line drawn? Seems rough to have to pay a penalty for something were your involvement sees you on the side of the conned party, the creditors. If the Rebels directors themselves have given the club their money, 6mil worth right, why aren’t they also listed as sitting with RA and the Tax office? And the legal threat was either way, new Rebels or defunct, I can’t see how RA assume the threat was less likely enough to warrant comment about it in this article. Surely RA ignore that and only worry about whether they can defend it or not, which they have reported as being comfortable with. So in effect wouldn’t it be more accurate to say there is no further legal threat (or worry) in denying the deal. Unless the directors have reneged on that. > Returns of a Japanese team or even Argentinean side, the Jaguares, were said to be on the cards, as were the ideas of standing up brand new teams in Hawaii or even Los Angeles – crazy ideas that seemingly forgot the time zone issues often cited as a turn-off for viewers when the competition contained teams from South Africa. Those timezones are great for SR and are what will probably be needed to unlock its future (cant see it remaining without _atleast _help from Aus), day games here are night games on the West Coast of america, were potential viewers triple, win win. With one of the best and easiest ways to unlock that being to play games or a host a team there. Less good the further across Aus you get though. Jaguares wouldn’t be the same Jaguares, but I still would think it’s better having them than keeping the Rebels. The other options aren’t really realistic 25’ options, no. From reading this authors last article I think if the new board can get the investment they seem to be confident in, you keeping them simply for the amount of money they’ll be investing in the game. Then ditch them later if they’re not good enough without such a high budget. Use them to get Jaguares reintergration stronger, with more key players on board, and have success drive success.

24 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Michael Cheika intéressé pour revenir au XIII Michael Cheika intéressé pour revenir au XIII
Search