Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

Owen Farrell's pitchside reaction after 'some honest conversations' got England back on track

By PA
Owen Farrell bumps fists with Billy Vunipola /Getty

Captain Owen Farrell was delighted England were back to playing like themselves, when questioned pitchside immediately after their 41-18 over Italy in their Guinness Six Nations match at Twickenham.

ADVERTISEMENT

He told ITV: “We’re probably back to being us. It’s not the perfect performance or the best performance we’ve ever had but in terms of the feeling, the energy, the intent – that felt back to us.”

Following the Twickenham defeat to the Scots, Farrell said the squad pushed hard in training and let their rugby do the talking on the pitch.

Video Spacer

Eddie Jones on strong England rugby showing, title chances & Jack Willis | Six Nations

Video Spacer

Eddie Jones on strong England rugby showing, title chances & Jack Willis | Six Nations

On what improved their performance, he added: “Some honest conversations that we had with ourselves during the week and the excitement to get out onto the training pitch to put things right.

“And the way that we built up showed in the way that we played.”

Farrell felt England’s intent to defeat Italy shone through after they went behind early on.

He added: “I thought we attacked the game.

“Obviously, they had an advantage to move the ball and ended up scoring a try which was probably a bit of over-eagerness but then, from that, I thought our intent was brilliant.

“We moved the ball, we got in behind them. Probably not everything went our way but we stuck at it and that’s the way that the game ended up going our way.”

ADVERTISEMENT

After bouncing back from last weekend’s opening defeat to Scotland, Kyle Sinckler was pleased England were moving in the right direction.

Sinckler told ITV: “I think it was a step in the right direction. Our intent was a lot better today, especially up front.

“We probably didn’t get the rewards we wanted but in terms of intent – and showing how much it means for us playing for our country – I think it was a step in the right direction and we’re looking forward to the next game.”

After England moved briefly to the top of the Six Nations table, Sinckler added: “We were obviously very frustrated with the performance last week and we knew we had to step up and play the England way and the way we want to dominate up front – which we did at times today.

ADVERTISEMENT

“But we know there’s still more to give. The game’s done, we move onto the next one.”

On the tough challenge their opponents posed, he added: “Credit to Italy. They were tough. They never gave up. We knew they were going to do that.

“Up front they were strong, their forwards carried hard and their backs had good energy, but credit to out boys. We stuck in there and got the win.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Fresh Starts | Episode 2 | Sam Whitelock

Royal Navy Men v Royal Air Force Men | Full Match Replay

Royal Navy Women v Royal Air Force Women | Full Match Replay

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 9

James Cook | The Big Jim Show | Full Episode

New Zealand victorious in TENSE final | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Men's Highlights

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

F
Flankly 16 hours ago
The AI advantage: How the next two Rugby World Cups will be won

If rugby wants to remain interesting in the AI era then it will need to work on changing the rules. AI will reduce the tactical advantage of smart game plans, will neutralize primary attacking weapons, and will move rugby from a being a game of inches to a game of millimetres. It will be about sheer athleticism and technique,about avoiding mistakes, and about referees. Many fans will find that boring. The answer is to add creative degrees of freedom to the game. The 50-22 is an example. But we can have fun inventing others, like the right to add more players for X minutes per game, or the equivalent of the 2-point conversion in American football, the ability to call a 12-player scrum, etc. Not saying these are great ideas, but making the point that the more of these alternatives you allow, the less AI will be able to lock down high-probability strategies. This is not because AI does not have the compute power, but because it has more choices and has less data, or less-specific data. That will take time and debate, but big, positive and immediate impact could be in the area of ref/TMO assistance. The technology is easily good enough today to detect forward passes, not-straight lineouts, offside at breakdown/scrum/lineout, obstruction, early/late tackles, and a lot of other things. WR should be ultra aggressive in doing this, as it will really help in an area in which the game is really struggling. In the long run there needs to be substantial creativity applied to the rules. Without that AI (along with all of the pro innovations) will turn rugby into a bash fest.

24 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Lima Sopoaga: ‘We wish we left New Zealand sooner’ Lima Sopoaga: ‘We wish we left New Zealand sooner’
Search