Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

'Only time we saw that tactic': Cheslin Kolbe's lonely Lions series

By Sam Smith
(Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images)

World Cup hero Cheslin Kolbe was once again stifled in the second test against the Lions, making headlines for the wrong reasons with a misfortunate aerial challenge on Conor Murray that could have had serious implications for the Irish scrumhalf.

ADVERTISEMENT

After three touches for 16 metres in the first test, Kolbe registered four touches for 14 metres and a yellow card in the second on another lonely night for the dynamic winger.

His magical touch for South Africa ‘A’ to set up Lukhanyo Am for a try in the warm-up match against the Lions is his only highlight of the tour so far, disappointing many watchers who were looking forward to seeing one of the world’s best players in action at the top level again.

Video Spacer

Lood de Jager on ‘personal’ Lions series

Video Spacer

Lood de Jager on ‘personal’ Lions series

Speaking on this weeks’ Aotearoa Rugby Pod, former Blues hooker James Parsons said he was excited early when it looked like the Springboks were looking to use their star out wide when in the right area of the field. He described a period of play that indicated a different approach was going to be used during the do-or-die game.

“I was really excited early on around the 10-minute mark, South Africa were about 30 metres out and they used the blind, made a little but of a breach then they came back to the 15, crashed there,” Parsons recalled.

“It wasn’t ‘on’ open, so they went back to the blind, set a ruck, came back to the 15. And then the picture was obviously ‘on’ to call it to the open.

“They called it open, they broke on the edge because they had sucked in the Lions’ defenders and they got Kolbe some space. And I thought, ‘they are here to play’.

ADVERTISEMENT

“And I was like ‘this is great’, they’ve got a clear tactic, yes they want contestables out of their half, but when they get close they are here to play.

“He [Kolbe] breached down the edge, there is a little bit of slow ball, and South Africa went back to one-dimensional, one-off runners. They ran out of options really and Am just put a grubber through.

“I was just surprised that was the only time we saw that tactic. Pretty much after that, they score two great tries off the back of forward dominance and using the kick, but it wasn’t so much the attacking flair that we were wanting to see.”

Neither side showed much in terms of attacking play with ball-in-hand, limiting not only Kolbe’s influence but the best of the Lions’ stars as well.

ADVERTISEMENT

Crusaders halfback Bryn Hall emphasised just how hard it is to play off aerial contests with the traffic being put around the high ball contests.

“If you are talking around how the Springboks play, it’s really hard,” he said.

“If you don’t want that aerial battle, look at the escorts, there are three people coming. Both teams are doing that. To be able to play off that is really hard.

“The previous week, they [Lions] won that aerial battle whereas this week Hogg, Van der Merwe, made some uncharacteristic mistakes under that high ball. From that, the South Africans pounced.

James Parsons highlighted how the Lions may have missed an opportunity to expand their game and play a little more like what they had done during the warm-up games. Their ‘reserved’ play in the first half didn’t show any willingness to take risks and it cost them.

“We were talking a few weeks ago during the warm-up games, I was loving the attack. The tips, the balls out the back, the willingness to play,” he said

“I think around the nine minute mark, the Lions are in the 22 and it’s literally pick and go, pick and go, pick and go. And then penalty, go for three.

“It wasn’t the same flair or willingness to play.

“I believe you are one up in the series, this is the game to chance your arm and go and win the series. It seemed a little bit reserved.

“All that possession and territory, they didn’t get reward for it. In that first half, they had 60 percent possession and 60 percent territory and go no reward.

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Fresh Starts | Episode 1 | Will Skelton

ABBIE WARD: A BUMP IN THE ROAD

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 8

James Cook | The Big Jim Show | Full Episode

New Zealand victorious in TENSE final | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Men's Highlights

New Zealand crowned BACK-TO-BACK champions | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Women's Highlights

Japan Rugby League One | Steelers v Sungoliath | Full Match Replay

Rugby Europe Women's Championship | Netherlands v Spain

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

S
Senzo Cicero 10 hours ago
'If the South Africans are in, they need to be all in'

1. True, if that “free” ticket means access to all but the prized exhibit - EVIP only. SA cannot host semis, even if they’ve earned it (see Sharks vs ASM Clermont Auvergne at… Twickenham Stoop). 2. Why no selective outrage over Lyon doing the exact same thing a week earlier? Out of all the countries France send the most “B teams”, why nobody talking about “disrespect” and “prioritising domestic leagues” and “kicking them out”? 3. Why no mention of the Sharks fielding all of their Springboks for the second rate Challenge cup QF? No commitment? 4. Why no mention of all the SA teams qualifying for respective euro knock out comps in the two seasons they’ve been in it? How many euro teams have qualified for KO’s in their history? Can’t compete? 5. Why no mention of SA teams beating French and English giants La Rochelle and Saracens? How many euro teams have done that in their history? Add no quality? The fact is that SA teams are only in their second season in europe, with no status and a fraction of the resources. Since joining the URC, SA has seen a repatriation of a number of players, and this will only grow once SA start sharing in the profits of competing in these comps, meaning bigger squads with greater depth and quality, meaning they don’t have to prioritise comps as they have to now - they don’t have imports from Pacifica and South America and everywhere else in between like “European” teams have - also less “Saffas” in Prem and T14, that’s what we want right? 'If the South Africans are in, they need to be all in' True, and we have to ensure we give them the same status and resources as we give everyone else to do just that. A small compromise on scheduling will go a long way in avoiding these situations, but guess what, France and England wont compromise on scheduling because they ironically… prioritise their domestic comps, go figure!

18 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE 'If the South Africans are in, they need to be all in' 'If the South Africans are in, they need to be all in'
Search