Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

One doom and gloom aspect to Ireland's Twickenham play seemingly hasn't sapped belief

By PA
(Photo by Julian Finney/Getty Images)

Forwards coach Simon Easterby insists there is no “doom and gloom” surrounding the malfunctioning Ireland lineout. Set-piece errors undermined Saturday’s performance against England as the Irish slipped to a resounding 18-7 loss in the Autumn Nations Cup.

ADVERTISEMENT

Ex-Ireland captain Easterby reckons mistakes are to be expected during a transitional period for the team under head coach Andy Farrell but is adamant shortcomings at Twickenham have not sapped belief.

“We’re on a bit of a journey with this lineout group,” said Ireland assistant Easterby. “We’ve got a couple of inexperienced younger guys in there who we feel are learning every week and growing in their roles, and it takes time to build combinations and get those things right.

Video Spacer

James Ryan reflects on Ireland’s defeat to England

Video Spacer

James Ryan reflects on Ireland’s defeat to England

“There’s definitely a couple of fixes that we need to make and alteration, but it’s certainly not doom and gloom. We’re really confident with the guys we selected and the guys that took the pitch on the weekend. There was a bit of inaccuracy and hopefully we will learn from that.

“Part of it is strategy, part of it is decision-making in the moment, part of it is the execution of some individuals and also as a unit. I am certainly not concerned that the confidence would be eroded on the back of the performance on the weekend.” 

Underdogs Georgia travel to the Aviva Stadium having failed to score a point in defeats to England and Wales. While other players have impressed at club level, Easterby said further call-ups were not made in order to give chances to members of the initial 34-man squad.

The 45-year-old anticipates an experimental selection for the game but says the coaching staff will not resort to handing out caps. “It’s really important that we back the players that we selected originally. This is another Test match,” Easterby said.

ADVERTISEMENT

“There are players that are going well in the provinces and putting their hands up. But there are also players that have trained really well throughout the last couple of weeks that haven’t had opportunities with us. There will be some experience in the team as well as some inexperience in the team for the weekend. But we don’t want to just be handing out caps as well. We want to make sure that guys earn the right to get selected.”

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

The Antoine Dupont Interview

Ireland v New Zealand | Singapore Men's HSBC SVNS Final Highlights

New Zealand v Australia | Singapore Women's HSBC SVNS Final Highlights

Inter Services Championships | Royal Army Men v Royal Navy Men | Full Match Replay

Fresh Starts | Episode 3 | Cobus Reinach

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 11

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

B
Bull Shark 1 hours ago
Speeded-up Super Rugby Pacific provides blueprint for wider game

I’m all for speeding up the game. But can we be certain that the slowness of the game contributed to fans walking out? I’m not so sure. Super rugby largely suffered from most fans only being able to, really, follow the games played in their own time zone. So at least a third of the fan base wasn’t engaged at any point in time. As a Saffer following SA teams in the URC - I now watch virtually every European game played on the weekend. In SR, I wouldn’t be bothered to follow the games being played on the other side of the world, at weird hours, if my team wasn’t playing. I now follow the whole tournament and not just the games in my time zone. Second, with New Zealand teams always winning. It’s like formula one. When one team dominates, people lose interest. After COVID, with SA leaving and Australia dipping in form, SR became an even greater one horse race. Thats why I think Japan’s league needs to get in the mix. The international flavor of those teams could make for a great spectacle. But surely if we believe that shaving seconds off lost time events in rugby is going to draw fans back, we should be shown some figures that supports this idea before we draw any major conclusions. Where are the stats that shows these changes have made that sort of impact? We’ve measured down to the average no. Of seconds per game. Where the measurement of the impact on the fanbase? Does a rugby “fan” who lost interest because of ball in play time suddenly have a revived interest because we’ve saved or brought back into play a matter of seconds or a few minutes each game? I doubt it. I don’t thinks it’s even a noticeable difference to be impactful. The 20 min red card idea. Agreed. Let’s give it a go. But I think it’s fairer that the player sent off is substituted and plays no further part in the game as a consequence.

1 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING 'Bulls***': Ex-England international calls out Eben Etzebeth 'Bulls***': Ex-England international calls out Eben Etzebeth
Search