Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

'Maybe Epi Taione could look at himself in the mirror and look at how he ran that union when he was president'

By Ian Cameron
(Photo by Mark Runnacles/Getty Images)
A former senior executive at World Rugby has criticised Dan Leo’s ‘Oceans Apart’ documentary, which sought to lift the lid on the many issues affecting rugby in the Pacific islands.

Mark Egan, who stepped down as head of competitions and performance at World Rugby after 18 years with the organisation, took issue with what he sees as the one-sided argument put forward by the documentary which was released earlier this year. The film evoked an enormous reaction online and inspired a call for change in how the game is governed by World Rugby.

Egan however, as part of wide-ranging interview with Owain Jones in the TheXV.rugby on the game, takes the film to task for pitching World Rugby as the villain of the piece.

Video Spacer

What Tongans have to do to play for their country:

Video Spacer

What Tongans have to do to play for their country:

‘I did see ‘Ocean’s Apart’ because I’ve been working with the Islanders for nigh on 20 years. I visit Tonga, Samoa and Fiji regularly – I’ve seen workings on the ground; I’ve visited union officials, coaches, locals and I’ve seen the facilities.”

The former lock, who played for Kolbe Steelers in the 1990s, before becoming a rugby administrator, questioned the governance of the unions, and pinpointed two former union officials who appeared in Oceans Apart.

“I thought it was very one-sided,” said Egan. “When they interviewed Vincent Fepuleai, the CEO of Samoa Rugby, what they didn’t mention was the interview took place in the £1.5million facility World Rugby funded. Maybe Epi Taione, the former President of the Tongan Rugby Union, could look at himself in the mirror and look at how he ran that Union when he was president.

“There are some good administrators in the Island Unions who do an incredible job in very challenging circumstances, but there are some well-documented issues in the media about how some of the Unions are run, especially Tonga. Fiji, Samoa and Tonga are not first-world economies, they have different economic challenges to say England, Wales, Australia and New Zealand. Unless you go there and meet the people, it’s difficult to really get a picture looking at a documentary like that.

Egan does admit it raised valid issues about the game and the Pacific islands.

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Fresh Starts | Episode 2 | Sam Whitelock

Royal Navy Men v Royal Air Force Men | Full Match Replay

Royal Navy Women v Royal Air Force Women | Full Match Replay

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 9

James Cook | The Big Jim Show | Full Episode

New Zealand victorious in TENSE final | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Men's Highlights

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

F
Flankly 5 hours ago
The AI advantage: How the next two Rugby World Cups will be won

If rugby wants to remain interesting in the AI era then it will need to work on changing the rules. AI will reduce the tactical advantage of smart game plans, will neutralize primary attacking weapons, and will move rugby from a being a game of inches to a game of millimetres. It will be about sheer athleticism and technique,about avoiding mistakes, and about referees. Many fans will find that boring. The answer is to add creative degrees of freedom to the game. The 50-22 is an example. But we can have fun inventing others, like the right to add more players for X minutes per game, or the equivalent of the 2-point conversion in American football, the ability to call a 12-player scrum, etc. Not saying these are great ideas, but making the point that the more of these alternatives you allow, the less AI will be able to lock down high-probability strategies. This is not because AI does not have the compute power, but because it has more choices and has less data, or less-specific data. That will take time and debate, but big, positive and immediate impact could be in the area of ref/TMO assistance. The technology is easily good enough today to detect forward passes, not-straight lineouts, offside at breakdown/scrum/lineout, obstruction, early/late tackles, and a lot of other things. WR should be ultra aggressive in doing this, as it will really help in an area in which the game is really struggling. In the long run there needs to be substantial creativity applied to the rules. Without that AI (along with all of the pro innovations) will turn rugby into a bash fest.

24 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING The AI advantage: How the next two Rugby World Cups will be won How the next two Rugby World Cups will be won
Search