Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

Nienaber names his best and worst moments from Lions Test series

By Liam Heagney
(Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images)

New Springboks coach Jacques Nienaber has named his best and worst moments so far in the Lions Test series which draws to a close with next Saturday’s third Test decider in Cape Town. The South African team’s former defence coach was promoted to the head role in the wake of the 2019 World Cup success but the pandemic meant it wasn’t until now that he has cut his teeth in the throes of a Test series battle.

ADVERTISEMENT

Nienaber found himself caught up in the virus outbreak that led to the cancellation of a preparation match versus Georgia and affected availability for training, but he was proud with how the squad reacted to the challenges of pandemic rugby as well as their collective response following the first Test defeat to the Lions.

With Rassie Erasmus, the South African director of rugby, still very much playing a hands-on role with the team and falling foul of World Rugby with his comments, there have been questions as to who is really in charge of the Springboks but this speculation has been dismissed and Nienaber took a moment after naming his third Test team to reflect on the past month and what has especially stood out for him, both good and bad.  

Video Spacer

The explosive Rassie Erasmus video

Video Spacer

The explosive Rassie Erasmus video

“The best moments in this series was to see this team adapt,” he said. “With Covid and the times we are living in, rugby isn’t as straightforward as it was in the past. We said at the start of this campaign that the team that adapts to the changes is probably going to be the team that walks out victorious at the end of the day. 

“We have been in situations where we were isolated for four, five, six days, couldn’t get out of our hotel rooms, and then a bunch of us got Covid and were in isolation for ten days and we had to coach online. The best thing is how the team adapted to that. 

“Another highlight is after the first Test match, the loss, how the players got together in terms of being creative, having a proper review, making plans and the ownership they took and investment they had in the team, it was a highlight to see. That is the nice thing we are growing and that is probably one of the biggest evolutions we had to get to, to change the way we do things. We are becoming a more experienced side and that is pleasing to see. 

“The bad things were the disruptions of not being able to work with the team. After the Georgia game, the last time I worked with the team was that Sunday and I didn’t work with them until after the game with the Bulls. Missing that coaching time with the group and not having a defensive session with them, I like being in the field, it is the highlight of my day and not having that for two weeks wasn’t nice.”

ADVERTISEMENT

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Fresh Starts | Episode 2 | Sam Whitelock

Royal Navy Men v Royal Air Force Men | Full Match Replay

Royal Navy Women v Royal Air Force Women | Full Match Replay

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 9

James Cook | The Big Jim Show | Full Episode

New Zealand victorious in TENSE final | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Men's Highlights

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

F
Flankly 7 hours ago
The AI advantage: How the next two Rugby World Cups will be won

If rugby wants to remain interesting in the AI era then it will need to work on changing the rules. AI will reduce the tactical advantage of smart game plans, will neutralize primary attacking weapons, and will move rugby from a being a game of inches to a game of millimetres. It will be about sheer athleticism and technique,about avoiding mistakes, and about referees. Many fans will find that boring. The answer is to add creative degrees of freedom to the game. The 50-22 is an example. But we can have fun inventing others, like the right to add more players for X minutes per game, or the equivalent of the 2-point conversion in American football, the ability to call a 12-player scrum, etc. Not saying these are great ideas, but making the point that the more of these alternatives you allow, the less AI will be able to lock down high-probability strategies. This is not because AI does not have the compute power, but because it has more choices and has less data, or less-specific data. That will take time and debate, but big, positive and immediate impact could be in the area of ref/TMO assistance. The technology is easily good enough today to detect forward passes, not-straight lineouts, offside at breakdown/scrum/lineout, obstruction, early/late tackles, and a lot of other things. WR should be ultra aggressive in doing this, as it will really help in an area in which the game is really struggling. In the long run there needs to be substantial creativity applied to the rules. Without that AI (along with all of the pro innovations) will turn rugby into a bash fest.

24 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE Who will be Robertson's choice as All Blacks captain? Who will be Robertson's choice as All Blacks captain?
Search