Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

New Zealand's elite players would be better served trying to win the odd test match rather than dictating terms of the Silver Lake deal

By Hamish Bidwell
(Photo by Mark Kolbe/Getty Images)

Let’s assume the New Zealand Rugby Players’ Association are the smartest guys in the room.

ADVERTISEMENT

Let’s assume that it’s only the NZRPA and not the staff at New Zealand Rugby (NZR) and their board, nor our 26 provincial unions, who can see any issues with the proposed Silver Lake private equity deal.

Let’s also assume that it’s only the NZRPA – and none of the other folk mentioned above – who have the game’s best interests at heart.

Video Spacer

The All Blacks share their toughest opponents | Healthspan Elite

Video Spacer

The All Blacks share their toughest opponents | Healthspan Elite

While we’re at it, let’s also assume the NZRPA have more integrity and vision than anyone at SA Rugby or Rugby Australia. Both those outfits – like NZR – are going down the private equity route in an effort to bankroll the game in their country.

More fool them, eh?

Correct me if I’m wrong, but this is the narrative we’re being sold, right? That NZR and the provincial unions are dullards, who are going to sell off the family silver for a few years of prosperity, but will ultimately go broke.

That the NZRPA can see this clear as day and by declining to endorse the deal with Silver Lake, are saving rugby in New Zealand from the halfwits who laughably call themselves the guardians of our game.

Again, feel free to jump in any time, because I’d hate to misrepresent the NZRPA’s position here.

ADVERTISEMENT

Silver Lake – as we’re all well aware by now – are offering NZR $387.5 million for a 12.5 percent stake in a newly-created entity called Commercial LP.

New Zealand Rugby, as they’ve been at pains to point out, need this money in order to stay afloat. They put it in more positive terms than that, highlighting all the worthy programmes and initiatives the Silver Lake loot would fund, but this money basically represents the difference between having to shut up shop and not.

The union have just posted a deficit of more than $34m for the 2020 financial year and – to be perfectly frank – are going broke trying to satisfy the wage demands of the NZRPA.
It’s hard to pin down exactly what the NZRPA don’t like about the Silver Lake deal, other than they don’t like it. As senior All Black Dane Coles put it, by way of explanation, they don’t want the team becoming a “comic book.’’

Never mind the NZRPA’s cartoonish ideas of what might suit them better, such as NZR selling a stake 5 percent in the All Blacks to the man and woman in the street.

ADVERTISEMENT

Rugby is broke now. In New Zealand, in Australia, in South Africa and money – and lots of it – has to come from somewhere.

Never mind five years from now, NZR and the 26 provincial unions are already skint. They’re already making losses and $20 donations from rank-and-file fans won’t really change that.

Short of the players agreeing to pay for free, it is going to take deals such as the Silver Lake one to keep a few of these national bodies in business.

Rob Nichol, the ubiquitous boss of the NZRPA, says his body will come to an agreement with NZR eventually. Which, in recent years, has tended to mean NZR will cave in to the players’ requests.

These same players who, when NZR no longer offers them a wage they feel is worthy of them, inevitably upsticks and go and play somewhere else.

It’s funny, isn’t it? You assume there’s the odd NZR staffer or board member who think they know more about rugby than the All Blacks themselves or their coaches. Who spectacularly overstep the mark occasionally and tell someone such as Coles where they’re going wrong with their lineout throwing.

We would dismiss such a person as a fool and yet here we are, letting players dictate what kind of commercial deals their employers can enter into.

The NZRPA worries that NZR will be broke five years from now. They argue the Silver Lake deal is a poor one, with the potential to bring the game to its knees.

They fear the commercialisation of the All Blacks’ jersey and the haka, as if neither are turning a buck for all concerned already.

Again, you’ll have to forgive me if I’m wrong, but there isn’t a queue of companies lined up around the block, looking to give NZR $400 million. And if there are, none of them are offering that money with no strings attached.

Rather than offering NZR advice of what’s a good deal and what’s not, our elite players would be better served trying to win the odd test match.

For all the players’ business acumen, few All Blacks have come close to justifying their salaries in the last year or so.

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Fresh Starts | Episode 1 | Will Skelton

ABBIE WARD: A BUMP IN THE ROAD

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 9

James Cook | The Big Jim Show | Full Episode

New Zealand victorious in TENSE final | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Men's Highlights

New Zealand crowned BACK-TO-BACK champions | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Women's Highlights

Japan Rugby League One | Bravelupus v Steelers | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

N
Nickers 7 hours ago
All Blacks sabbaticals ‘damage Super Rugby Pacific when it is fighting for survival’

Sabbaticals have helped keep NZ’s very best talent in the country on long term deals - this fact has been left out of this article. Much like the articles calling to allow overseas players to be selected, yet can only name one player currently not signed to NZR who would be selected for the ABs. And in the entire history of NZ players leaving to play overseas, literally only 4 or 5 have left in their prime as current ABs. (Piatau, Evans, Hayman, Mo’unga,?) Yes Carter got an injury while playing in France 16 years ago, but he also got a tournament ending injury at the 2011 World Cup while taking mid-week practice kicks at goal. Maybe Jordie gets a season-ending injury while playing in Ireland, maybe he gets one next week against the Brumbies. NZR have many shortcomings, but keeping the very best players in the country and/or available for ABs selection is not one of them. Likewise for workload management - players missing 2 games out of 14 is hardly a big deal in the grand scheme of things. Again let’s use some facts - did it stop the Crusaders winning SR so many times consecutively when during any given week they would be missing 2 of their best players? The whole idea of the sabbatical is to reward your best players who are willing to sign very long term deals with some time to do whatever they want. They are not handed out willy-nilly, and at nowhere near the levels that would somehow devalue Super Rugby. In this particular example JB is locked in with NZR for what will probably (hopefully) be the best years of his career, hard to imagine him not sticking around for a couple more after for a Lions tour and one more world cup. He has the potential to become the most capped AB of all time. A much better outcome than him leaving NZ for a minimum of 3 years at the age of 27, unlikely to ever play for the ABs again, which would be the likely alternative.

3 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING The 124kg 'enforcer' Matfield tips to 'take over' from Etzebeth The 124kg 'enforcer' Matfield tips to 'take over' from Etzebeth
Search