Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

Matt Williams claims Celtic sides might never win Six Nations again if Boks join

By Ian Cameron
Louis Rees-Zammit is tackled by Siya Kolisi /PA

Former Scotland coach Matt Williams has claimed that the Celtic nations might never win the Six Nations again if the Springboks were allowed to join.

ADVERTISEMENT

The claim was made during a Virgin Media Sports discussion centred around Italy and their ongoing viability in the tournament, after they fell to a 32 – 22 loss to Scotland in Rome.

Italy have now lost 36 times consecutively in the competition, and despite a promising young side emerging under New Zealander Kieran Crowley, winning still appears to be out of reach for the Azzurri.

Video Spacer

Back in the Game – RFU

Video Spacer

Back in the Game – RFU

The disheartening run of losses has of course given rise a yearly debate around their continuing in the tournament and the debate this season has been coloured by talk of South Africa eventually joining.

The Six Nations have firmly denied any changes on this front are afoot, but it hasn’t stopped pundits pondering what a Springboks side in the Six Nations might look like.

Shane Horgan warned that Italy could go another 36 games without a win if the isn’t meaningful change.

“On the evidence of today, it’ll be another 36 games before they win a game in the Six Nations.

“Unless there’s fundamental change, the drumbeat for South Africa to be in this is are going to get louder.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Despite Wales and Ireland having won seven of the last ten Six Nations, Williams then made the odd claim that Ireland, Scotland and Wales could face never winning the tournament again if South Africa joined.

“The problem with international rugby is that it is the result of long-term athletic development. You can’t develop the group required at the national team – it has to be done before they get to the national team,” Williams said.

Related

“That’s why the academy systems and club systems are so important. I’m going to say something here, disagreeing with Shane [Horgan]. If South Africa come into this competition, the Celtic countries will face not winning, possibly ever, the competition again.

“That cannot happen. The Welsh, the Irish, and the Scots cannot enter into a competition that is traditionally theirs, where they say, ‘the chances of you winning this in the future are almost nil.’

ADVERTISEMENT

“How are Ireland, Scotland, or Wales, going to go down to Pretoria at altitude in the summer and win?”

It seems like an odd claim, given Ireland have won on South African soil as recently as 2016, a tour where many felt they were unfortunate not to pick up a series victory against the Springboks, with just six points separating the sides in all three Tests.

What makes it even more odd is that in a theoretical competition involving the Boks, every other year the Celtic sides would be hosting the Springboks at home, where all three have toppled the Springboks in recent years.

Horgan did disagree with Williams’ point, saying: “I don’t think that’s the debate. Because I think that could happen [winning in South Africa].

“I think it would become very difficult to win a Grand Slam under those circumstances but that’s not the point.

“I’m saying that they shouldn’t be in this tournament. But there will be a drumbeat that will continue which says ‘how can we continue with one nation that loses every single game… and it can’t continue.

“Unless it’s changed, someone at someone will say ‘to make this more competitive, we’ll get South Africa in there’. There’s a difference between not being competitive and losing every single game for six years.

“It’s not even close.”

Williams then pointed out: ‘I think the last six years, everyone is disappointed with Italy. There’s no two ways about it, including the Italians. There’s no joy for Italian rugby in any of this.

“I think a serious conversation needs to had with the leadership in Italian rugby about what they’re doing with their programme.

“If we switch this on their head, at the beginning of professional, Ireland were right down the bottom o the ladder. They went about building up their clubs and their academies and now we’re in the situation where Ireland are winners.

“The solution to this is not going to come in 12 months. We look at France, who are going to win the Grand Slam at the end of an eight year plan. It started when these kids, the current players, were 16, 17 and 18.

“The trouble is we’re hearing the opposite. That they taking out of their systems.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Fresh Starts | Episode 2 | Sam Whitelock

Royal Navy Men v Royal Air Force Men | Full Match Replay

Royal Navy Women v Royal Air Force Women | Full Match Replay

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 9

James Cook | The Big Jim Show | Full Episode

New Zealand victorious in TENSE final | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Men's Highlights

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

F
Flankly 3 hours ago
The AI advantage: How the next two Rugby World Cups will be won

If rugby wants to remain interesting in the AI era then it will need to work on changing the rules. AI will reduce the tactical advantage of smart game plans, will neutralize primary attacking weapons, and will move rugby from a being a game of inches to a game of millimetres. It will be about sheer athleticism and technique,about avoiding mistakes, and about referees. Many fans will find that boring. The answer is to add creative degrees of freedom to the game. The 50-22 is an example. But we can have fun inventing others, like the right to add more players for X minutes per game, or the equivalent of the 2-point conversion in American football, the ability to call a 12-player scrum, etc. Not saying these are great ideas, but making the point that the more of these alternatives you allow, the less AI will be able to lock down high-probability strategies. This is not because AI does not have the compute power, but because it has more choices and has less data, or less-specific data. That will take time and debate, but big, positive and immediate impact could be in the area of ref/TMO assistance. The technology is easily good enough today to detect forward passes, not-straight lineouts, offside at breakdown/scrum/lineout, obstruction, early/late tackles, and a lot of other things. WR should be ultra aggressive in doing this, as it will really help in an area in which the game is really struggling. In the long run there needs to be substantial creativity applied to the rules. Without that AI (along with all of the pro innovations) will turn rugby into a bash fest.

24 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE Who will be Robertson's choice as All Blacks captain? Who will be Robertson's choice as All Blacks captain?
Search