Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

Lions give Finn Russell injury update after removal of ankle boot

By Liam Heagney
(Photo by PA)

Lions assistant coach Gregor Townsend has delivered an update on the status of Finn Russell and the achilles injury that resulted in the mid-tour call-up of England out-half Marcus Smith who will start this Saturday’s match versus the Stormers due to the unavailability of Russell and Warren Gatland’s desire to freshen up Dan Biggar and Owen Farrell by leaving them on the sidelines.

ADVERTISEMENT

It was last Saturday after the win in the Sharks rematch when Gatland revealed the worrying news about Russell’s ankle. “It isn’t a strained achilles, there is a slight little wee tear in it so it is going to keep him out for the next couple of weeks,” said the Lions coach.

“We are going to try and see if we can rehab him. He is going to be in a boot for the next five days and when he comes out of that, he will have some more treatment. He will still continue to get treatment over the next five days and if he is making good progress then we will assess him going forward. If he is not there is a possibility that he may go home. It’s a wait-and-see situation.”

Video Spacer

RugbyPass fanzone on what Alun Wyn Jones returning to the Lions means for tour skipper Conor Murray

Video Spacer

RugbyPass fanzone on what Alun Wyn Jones returning to the Lions means for tour skipper Conor Murray

That was the same description Townsend used about the injury when he provided an update on Friday, six days after Gatland had originally spoken about the achilles tear. “It’s wait and see,” said the assistant at the captain’s run virtual media briefing in Cape Town, his first media duties since his week in self-isolation following the virus outbreak last week in the Lions camp.

“We are now five, six days into his recovery. He had an injection into that area. He is out of his boot so he will start the rehab process gently this week and then when we get to the end of next week we are hoping he will be back involved in full training. It’s unlikely he will be involved in the first Test but we are still hopeful he will be available for the last two.”

With Biggar pulled at the last minute from the midweek Lions starting line-up against South Africa A due to an ankle sprain and not looked at for selection against the Stormers, no single out-half has dominated the No10 selection so far on the tour. Biggar and Farrell have each made two starts at out-half, with Russell starting once, and the emphasis this weekend shifts onto the Lions’ fourth out-half, the newly called up Smith.

“Two starts isn’t bad,” assured Townsend, dismissing concerns that whoever is eventually picked to start at No10 in the first Test against the Springboks on July 24 could potentially be undercooked. “These are guys who are experienced players, they are all between 28 and 30 years old, they know their way around a Test match and they have trained pretty much full apart from Finn in the last few days so they will be fine.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Whoever is selected at 10 we hope they are fully fit and that is one reason why Dan and Owen are not involved tomorrow [Saturday], just to make sure we have got a full week of training next week with those guys available.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Fresh Starts | Episode 1 | Will Skelton

ABBIE WARD: A BUMP IN THE ROAD

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 9

James Cook | The Big Jim Show | Full Episode

New Zealand victorious in TENSE final | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Men's Highlights

New Zealand crowned BACK-TO-BACK champions | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Women's Highlights

Japan Rugby League One | Bravelupus v Steelers | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

S
Sam T 4 hours ago
Jake White: Let me clear up some things

I remember towards the end of the original broadcasting deal for Super rugby with Newscorp that there was talk about the competition expanding to improve negotiations for more money - more content, more cash. Professional rugby was still in its infancy then and I held an opposing view that if Super rugby was a truly valuable competition then it should attract more broadcasters to bid for the rights, thereby increasing the value without needing to add more teams and games. Unfortunately since the game turned professional, the tension between club, talent and country has only grown further. I would argue we’re already at a point in time where the present is the future. The only international competitions that matter are 6N, RC and RWC. The inter-hemisphere tours are only developmental for those competitions. The games that increasingly matter more to fans, sponsors and broadcasters are between the clubs. Particularly for European fans, there are multiple competitions to follow your teams fortunes every week. SA is not Europe but competes in a single continental competition, so the travel component will always be an impediment. It was worse in the bloated days of Super rugby when teams traversed between four continents - Africa, America, Asia and Australia. The percentage of players who represent their country is less than 5% of the professional player base, so the sense of sacrifice isn’t as strong a motivation for the rest who are more focused on playing professional rugby and earning as much from their body as they can. Rugby like cricket created the conundrum it’s constantly fighting a losing battle with.

4 Go to comments
E
Ed the Duck 11 hours ago
How Leinster neutralised 'long-in-the-tooth' La Rochelle

Hey Nick, your match analysis is decent but the top and tail not so much, a bit more random. For a start there’s a seismic difference in regenerating any club side over a test team. EJ pretty much had to urinate with the appendage he’d been given at test level whereas club success is impacted hugely by the budget. Look no further than Boudjellal’s Toulon project for a perfect example. The set ups at La Rochelle and Leinster are like chalk and cheese and you are correct that Leinster are ahead. Leinster are not just slightly ahead though, they are light years ahead on their plans, with the next gen champions cup team already blooded, seasoned and developing at speed from their time manning the fort in the URC while the cream play CC and tests. They have engineered a strong talent conveyor belt into their system, supported by private money funnelled into a couple of Leinster private schools. The really smart move from Leinster and the IRFU however is maximising the Irish Revenue tax breaks (tax relief on the best 10 years earnings refunded at retirement) to help keep all of their stars in Ireland and happy, while simultaneously funding marquee players consistently. And of course Barrett is the latest example. But in no way is he a “replacement for Henshaw”, he’s only there for one season!!! As for Rob Baxter, the best advice you can give him is to start lobbying Parliament and HMRC for a similar state subsidy, but don’t hold your breath… One thing Cullen has been very smart with is his coaching team. Very quickly he realised his need to supplement his skills, there was talk of him exiting after his first couple of years but he was extremely shrewd bringing in Lancaster and now Nienaber. That has worked superbly and added a layer that really has made a tangible difference. Apart from that you were bang on the money… 😉😂

5 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE How Leinster neutralised 'long-in-the-tooth' La Rochelle How Leinster neutralised 'long-in-the-tooth' La Rochelle
Search