'It is what it is': All Blacks have no complaints over card decisions
All Blacks head coach Ian Foster said that his side ran into a ‘very desperate’ Ireland side in Dunedin that was hellbent on reversing last week’s 42-19 loss.
Whilst it was in the second quarter last week where the All Blacks exploded with three tries, it was a chaotic period at Forsyth Barr that saw the home side receive two yellow cards and one red.
Foster praised they way his side handled the setbacks with the team scoring right on halftime through Beauden Barrett despite holding a one man deficit. Going into the sheds down 10-7 was a bonus result for an All Black side that was under serious pressure.
“It was an Irish team that turned up very, very desperate,” Foster said in his post-match review.
“Again, we had a couple of starts that were sub-standard which we’ve got to improve on but I love the attitude in the team through that rather chaotic quarter where things were happening with cards and everything.
“To finish where we finished that first half I thought was a real test of character for us.
“That try in the second half again hurt us and trying to play catch-up with 14 men is never easy against a really well-organised defensive team but there was probably an unacceptable amount of errors in terms of handling stuff but a lot of that was due to pressure and trying to force things and trying to create space against what Ireland were doing.
Angus Ta’avao’s red card for head-to-head contact on Ireland’s centre Garry Ringrose came just after Ofa Tuungafasi had been yellow carded for an early tackle on Ringrose, leaving the All Blacks down two props.
Foster said that the All Blacks had no complaints about the spate of cards during the first half.
“It is what it is. I think there’ll be no one that saw it as intentional but it was certainly a head-on-head contact,” he said.
“Two yellow cards previously … the officials were reasonably clear on that. I probably don’t see a lot different from Ofa tackling somebody when he accepted the dummy and then them not getting a yellow card for James Lowe on Quinn but we’re not grizzling about the cards.”
In the chaos of managing the absence of two props, the All Blacks first substituted blindside Dalton Papalii for Angus Ta’avao, but then substituted No 8 Ardie Savea for Aidan Ross once Ta’avao received his red card.
Because Savea was subbed due to a red card, the match officials refused to allow the All Black loose forward back into the game, a contentious ruling that has come under the spotlight after the game.
Hooker Codie Taylor admitted that he was as shocked as anyone as he was unaware of the rule in that situation and not having Savea on the field was a big loss for the side.
“To be honest, I didn’t even realise at the time. I didn’t know the rules – I don’t know the rules,” he said.
“For me, I was just in the game and thought around that whole situation with people going off, I think the leaders in those scenarios stepped up tonight – especially
that first half.
“We got pretty desperate and I think we came together pretty well but when you’re down to 13 men at one point against a pretty classy Irish side, you’re going to put yourself under pressure.”
“He’s one of the best players, if not the best player in the world at the moment. When he goes off the field, with his ability you want him on the field. I’m not quite sure what happened there – I think there’s a bit of rules or something.
“You want all your men on the field, of course, but someone of that calibre, you definitely want on the park.”
All Black halfback Aaron Smith said it was skill execution, not defensive pressure from Ireland, that ultimately cost the home side.
The scoreboard pressure Ireland had built did play apart and they closed the game out on top of that.
“Not exactly. I think playing with 14 men is pretty tough for a large period of that game,” Smith said.
“We knew we were going to have to be a lot better. There were a lot of things we could control with our clean outs, our ball carry, and like I said, around our skill execution of forcing things maybe.
“We were just a bit off. They really put us away. They had that scoreboard pressure, that 10-point buffer, had us have to start playing a bit more.”
Comments on RugbyPass
No SA supporter miss Super Rugby - a product that is experiencing significant head wind in ANZ - the competition from rival codes are intense, match attendance figures are at a historical low and the negativity of commentators such as Kirwan and Wilson have accelerated the downward spiral in NZ. After the next RWC in 2027 sponsors will follow Qantas and start leaving in droves.
2 Go to commentsLike others, I am not seeing the connection between this edition of the Crusaders and the All Blacks future prospects under Razor. I think the analysis of the Crusaders attack recently is helpful because Razor and his coaching team used to be able to slot new guys in to their systems and see them succeed. Several of Razor’s coaches are still there so it would be surprising if the current attack and set piece has been overhauled to a great extent - but based on that analysis, it may have been. Whether it is too many new guys due to injuries or retirement or a failure of current Crusaders systems is the main question to be answered imo. It doesn’t seem relevant for the ABs.
3 Go to commentsharry potter is set in stone. he creates stability and finishes well. exactly what schmidt likes. he’s the ben smith of australian rugby. i think it could quite easily be potter toole and kellaway for the foreseeable future.
5 Go to commentsThis is short sighted from Clayton if you ask me, smacks of too much preseason planning and no adaptability. What if DMac is out for a must win match, are they still only going to bring their best first five and playmaker on late in the game? Trusting the game to someone who wasn’t even part of planning (they would have had Trask pinned in as Jacomb preseason). Perhaps if the Crusaders were better they would not have done this, but either way imo you take this opportunity to play a guy you might need starting in a final rather than having their 12th game getting comfortable coming off the bench.
1 Go to commentsThanks Brett.. At last a positive article on the potential of Wallaby candidates, great to read. Schmidt’s record as an international rugby coach speaks for itself, I’m somewhat confident he will turn the Wallaby’s fortunes around …. on the field. It will be up to others to steady the ship off the paddock. But is there a flaw in my optimism? We have known all along that Australia has the players to be very competitive with their international rivals. We know that because everyone keeps telling us. So why the poor results? A question that requires a definitive answer before the turn around can occur. Joe Schmidt signed on for 2 years, time to encompass the Lions tour of 2025. By all accounts he puts family first and that’s fair enough, but I would wager that his 2 year contract will be extended if the next 18 months or so shows the statement “Australia has the players” proves to be correct. The new coach does not have a lot of time to meld together an outfit that will be competitive in the Rugby Championship - it will be interesting to see what happens. It will be interesting to see what happens with Giteau law, the new Wallaby coach has already verbalised that he would to prefer to select from those who play their rugby in Australia. His first test in charge is in July just over 3 months away .. not a long time. I for one wish him well .. heaven knows Australia needs some positive vibes.
21 Go to commentsWhat a load of bollocks. The author has forgotten to mention the fact that the Crusaders have a huge injury toll with top world class players out. Not to mention the fact that they are obviously in a transition period. No this will not spark a slow death for NZ rugby, but it does mean there will be a new Super Rugby champion. Anyone who knows anything about NZ rugby knows that there is some serious talent here, it just isn’t all at the Crusaders.
3 Go to commentsI wouldn’t spend the time on Nawaqanitawase! No point in having him filling in a jersey when he’s committed to leave Union. Give the jersey to a young prospect who will be here in the future.
5 Go to commentsIt was a pleasure to watch those guys playing with such confidence. That trio can all be infuriating for different reasons and I can see why Jones might have decided against them. No way to justify leaving Ikitau out though. Jorgensen and him were both scheduled to return at the same time. Only one of them plays for Randwick and has a dad who is great mates with the national coach though.
53 Go to commentsBrayden Iose and Peter Lakai are very exciting Super Rugby players but are too short and too light to ever be a Test 8 vs South Africa, France, Ireland, and England, Lakai could potentially be a Test player at 7 if he is allowed to focus on 7 for Hurricanes.
7 Go to commentsPencils “Thomas du Toit” into possible 2027 Bok squad.
1 Go to commentsDon’t see why Harrison makes the bench. Jones can play at 10 if needed, and there is a good case for starting her there to begin with if testing combinations. That would leave room for Sing on the bench
1 Go to commentsWhat a load of old bull!
1 Go to commentsOf the rugby I’ve born witness to in my lifetime - 1990 to date - I recognize great players throughout those years. But I have no doubt the game and the players are on average better today. So I doubt going back further is going to prove me wrong. The technical components of the game, set pieces, scrums, kicks, kicks at goal. And in general tactics employed are far more efficient, accurate and polished. Professional athletes that have invested countless hours on being accurate. There is one nation though that may be fairly competitive in any era - and that for me is the all blacks. And New Zealand players in general. NZ produces startling athletes who have fantastic ball skills. And then the odd phenomenon like Brooke. Lomu. Mcaw. Carter. Better than comparing players and teams across eras - I’ve often had this thought - that it would be very interesting to have a version of the game that is closer to its original form. What would the game look like today if the rules were rolled back. Not rules that promote safety obviously - but rules like: - a try being worth 1 point and conversion 2 points. Hence the term “try”. Earning a try at goals. Would we see more attacking play? - no lifting in the lineouts. - rucks and break down laws in general. They looked like wrestling matches in bygone eras. I wonder what a game applying 1995 rules would look like with modern players. It may be a daft exercise, but it would make for an interesting spectacle celebrating “purer” forms of the game that roll back the rules dramatically by a few versions. Would we come to learn that some of the rules/combinations of the rules we see today have actually made the game less attractive? I’d love to see an exhibition match like that.
29 Go to commentsIrish Rugby CEO be texting Andy Farrell “Andy, i found our next Kiwi Irishman”
5 Go to commentsI certainly don’t miss drinking beers at 8am in the morning watching rugby games being played in NZ.
2 Go to commentsThis looks like a damage limitation exercise for Wales, keeping back some of their more effective players for the last 20/25 minutes to try and counter England’s fresh legs so the Red Roses don’t rack up a big score.
1 Go to commentsVery unlikely the Bulls will beat Leinster in Dublin. It would be different in Pretoria.
1 Go to commentsI think it is a dangerous path to go down to ban a player for the same period that a player they injured takes to recover. Players would be afraid to tackle anyone. I once tackled my best friend at school in a practice match and sprained his ankle. I paid for it by having to play fly-half instead of full-back for the rest of that season’s fixtures.
5 Go to commentsJust such a genuine good bloke…and probably the best all round player in his generation. Good guys do come first sometimes and he handled the W.Cup loss with great attitude.
2 Go to commentsWord in France is that he’s on the radar of a few Top14 clubs.
5 Go to comments