Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

'If you're tough enough to take on a man's wife and can't do it in front of him then...'

(Photo by Cameron Spencer/Getty Images)

CJ Stander has hit out at the anonymous keyboard warriors who launched personal attacks on his family via social media following Ireland’s World Cup trouncing at the hand of New Zealand. 

ADVERTISEMENT

The South African, along with others in Joe Schmidt’s squad, were heavily criticised after the tournament in Japan turned sour for a team that went to the finals as the world’s No1 ranked side only to be beaten by the hosts in the pool stages and then suffer elimination at the quarter-finals. 

Some of the fallout was caustic, with even Stander’s wife Jean-Marie, the former South African international standard swimmer, branding it as disrespectful. 

Now, fresh from a man of the match award in the opening game of the new Andy Farrell era, Stander has himself broached the subject ahead of Ireland’s round two Six Nations showdown versus Wales in Dublin.

“Life changes,” shrugged Stander during a midweek session with Irish media ahead of the Aviva Stadium game against Wayne Pivac’s side. 

(Continue reading below…)

Andy Farrell and Johnny Sexton following Ireland’s 19-12 win over Scotland 

Video Spacer

“Social media got out there and everyone has an opinion. We probably need to deal with it sometimes differently and not let it affect you but sometimes it touches close to home and then it gets tough. I always try to keep those things away, you know, but it is tough. It is tough. It doesn’t matter what you do.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Suddenly people start attacking your family on social media. For me, that is tough because I believe that if you are tough enough to take on a man’s wife and you can’t do it in front of him then… mmm, there is a line there that you step over.

“That might be my South African side coming through, but that raises a hair on my neck. I do a job that is out there and people need to judge me. That is what we do on a Saturday. We are out there to play, to perform at this level.

“People are going to judge you and you are going to have to handle that and that is fair. I can take it. But as soon as you start taking on a man’s family…

“My wife was trying to hide it but when I got back (from Japan) I saw that it impacted (her) a little bit. But she is a strong woman. She handled it well. She can stand up for herself. She didn’t study law for nothing. She is a tough one. That is why I like her.”

ADVERTISEMENT

WATCH: The Rugby Pod sets the scene ahead of the second round of the 2020 Guinness Six Nations 

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 11

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Pacific Four Series 2024 | Canada vs USA

Japan Rugby League One | Verblitz v Eagles | Full Match Replay

Fresh Starts | Episode 2 | Sam Whitelock

Royal Navy Men v Royal Air Force Men | Full Match Replay

Royal Navy Women v Royal Air Force Women | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
Jon 8 hours ago
The case for keeping the Melbourne Rebels in Super Rugby Pacific

I have heard it asked if RA is essentially one of the part owners and I suppose therefor should be on the other side of these two parties. If they purchased the rebels and guaranteed them, and are responsible enough they incur Rebels penalties, where is this line drawn? Seems rough to have to pay a penalty for something were your involvement sees you on the side of the conned party, the creditors. If the Rebels directors themselves have given the club their money, 6mil worth right, why aren’t they also listed as sitting with RA and the Tax office? And the legal threat was either way, new Rebels or defunct, I can’t see how RA assume the threat was less likely enough to warrant comment about it in this article. Surely RA ignore that and only worry about whether they can defend it or not, which they have reported as being comfortable with. So in effect wouldn’t it be more accurate to say there is no further legal threat (or worry) in denying the deal. Unless the directors have reneged on that. > Returns of a Japanese team or even Argentinean side, the Jaguares, were said to be on the cards, as were the ideas of standing up brand new teams in Hawaii or even Los Angeles – crazy ideas that seemingly forgot the time zone issues often cited as a turn-off for viewers when the competition contained teams from South Africa. Those timezones are great for SR and are what will probably be needed to unlock its future (cant see it remaining without _atleast _help from Aus), day games here are night games on the West Coast of america, were potential viewers triple, win win. With one of the best and easiest ways to unlock that being to play games or a host a team there. Less good the further across Aus you get though. Jaguares wouldn’t be the same Jaguares, but I still would think it’s better having them than keeping the Rebels. The other options aren’t really realistic 25’ options, no. From reading this authors last article I think if the new board can get the investment they seem to be confident in, you keeping them simply for the amount of money they’ll be investing in the game. Then ditch them later if they’re not good enough without such a high budget. Use them to get Jaguares reintergration stronger, with more key players on board, and have success drive success.

24 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE The case for keeping the Melbourne Rebels in Super Rugby Pacific The case for keeping the Melbourne Rebels in Super Rugby Pacific
Search