Ian Foster pinpoints who must be held 'accountable' for All Blacks loss
All Blacks head coach Ian Foster says his backline players must be held to account for their poor decision-making which contributed to his side’s loss to Ireland over the weekend.
The All Blacks fell to their third defeat to the Irish in five years as they lost 29-20 in stunning fashion in front of a boisterous Aviva Stadium crowd in Dublin.
Throughout the course of the match, the All Blacks struggled for ascendency as Ireland controlled possession and territory for most of the encounter.
Much of Ireland’s success seemingly stemmed from their dominance in physicality and in the collision zone, but Foster moved to defend his forward pack while speaking to media upon his arrival in Paris on Monday [NZT] ahead of this week’s test against France.
While he acknowledged his big men were outplayed by their Irish counterparts, Foster said his backs need to shoulder some of the blame for their defeat as he believes they didn’t allow the forwards to perform to the best of their ability.
The All Blacks boss highlighted his players’ decision to boot possession away as a sticking point from their second defeat of 2021 after being guilty of the same indiscretion against the Springboks in Townsville earlier this year.
“I think our pack’s gone pretty well through the year. Overall, I’ve been reasonably satisfied to date,” Foster said.
“Certainly, we got put on the back foot a little bit last night, but parts of our forward play, I thought, was really good.
“But, consistently over 80 minutes, we’ve got to get stronger, and, also, we’ve got to make sure that we’re giving our forwards a chance to impose themselves on the opposition a bit better.
“I thought we turned over a lot of ball in the backs within one-to-two phases again, and that’s something that actually hurt us in the first test against South Africa, even though we won it.
“We got into a similar problem [against Ireland], and that came back to bite us a little bit, so it’s really a matter of backs being accountable for the decisions they make and retaining the ball to give our forwards a chance to impose themselves, and that’s going to be a big part of the solution.”
In spite of that, Foster deemed a tactical overhaul as unnecessary for Sunday’s [NZT] season-ending clash against Les Bleus at the Stade de France, where a defeat would condemn the All Blacks to their worst test campaign since 2009.
There are going to have to be some selection change-ups this weekend when a reeling All Blacks side takes on France. #AllBlacks #IREvNZL #FRAvNZLhttps://t.co/3B9sEmTMdj
— RugbyPass (@RugbyPass) November 15, 2021
However, he made note that his side tried to overplay their hand too early against the Irish and indicated that the Kiwis must earn the right to play expansively against a French team whose defence is masterminded by English guru Shaun Edwards.
“Our defence has been a considerable contributor to our performance through this year, and I think we are seeing a lot of growth through that space,” he said.
“But, I think when you’re playing a team that you’re asked to make a lot of tackles, and then when you do get the ball, you’ve got to build the right to try and put them under pressure and I think we were a little bit keen on making things happen too quickly.
“When we turned it over, that put us straight into a defensive mode, so we probably needed to build some periods of time in that game that we could actually start putting them under more pressure than we actually did.
“When we did do that, it was actually looking okay, but we didn’t do enough of it.”
Any adjustments to the All Blacks’ game plan will be made over the coming days as New Zealand’s coaching staff conduct a review into what went wrong in the Irish capital.
Don’t expect France to replicate Ireland in the way in which they go about trying to beat the All Blacks in Paris this weekend. #AllBlacks #FRAvNZL #AutumnNationsSeries https://t.co/9cBQcMI0iP
— RugbyPass (@RugbyPass) November 14, 2021
That review is scheduled to take place overnight, but Foster has already hinted that changes are required if the All Blacks are to breach the advantage line with ball in hand, something they routinely failed to do against Ireland.
With that in mind, Anton Lienert-Brown’s partially dislocated shoulder, which has ruled him out of the France test, could force the inclusion of youngster Quinn Tupaea in the Kiwi midfield given his powerful ball-carrying ability.
“We’ll come up with a plan. There’s some things we’re going to have to do against France and you’ve got to make sure we make a lot of gain line in the game of rugby nowadays,” Foster said.
“We didn’t get enough last week to operate off in an effective way, so we’ve got to find ways through that.
“That’s not just an attitudinal thing, that’s a tactical and skill-based thing as well, so that’s stuff that’s we’ve got to build our plan and process this week and figure out where the best part of the field is to get that, where we see opportunities, versus France, and they’ll be different to Ireland.”
Comments on RugbyPass
He is right , the Crusaders will be a threat. Scott Barrett, ( particularly), Fergus Burke , Codie Taylor, ( from sabbatical) etc due back soon for the Crusaders. There are others like Zach Gallagher too. People can right the Crusaders off, Top 8 , here we come !!
1 Go to commentsWe will always struggle for money to match the other sides but the least the WRU can do is invest properly in Welsh rugby. Too much has been squandered on vanity projects like the hotel and roof walk amongst others which will never see a massive return. Hanging the 4 pro sides out to dry over the last decade is now coming back to bite the WRU financially as well as on the pitch. You reap what you sow.
1 Go to commentsWhat do you get if you cross a doctor with a fish? A plastic sturgeon
14 Go to commentsWhat happened to feleti Kaitu’u? Hasnt played in a while right?
1 Go to commentsGregor I just can’t agree with you. You are trying to find something that just isn’t there. Jordie Barrett has signed until 2028. By the end of that he would have spent probably 11-12 years on Super Rugby and you say he can’t possibly have one season playing somewhere else. It is absurd. What about this scenario, the NZR play hard ball and he decides to leave and play overseas. How would that affect the competition. There seems to be an agenda by certain journalists to push certain agendas and don’t like it when it’s not to their liking. I fully support the NZR on this. Gregor needs to get a life.
2 Go to commentsHope he stays as believe he can do a great job.
1 Go to commentsMake what step up? Manie has a World Cup winner’s medal around his neck and changed the way the Springboks can play. He doesn’t have anything to prove to anyone. The win record of the Boks with him in the team is tremendous. Sacha can be wonderful and I hope he has a very succesful Bok career, but comparing him to Manie in terms of the next Bok flyhalf is very strange. Manie is the incumbent (not the next) and doing pretty incredibly.
1 Go to comments00 😍 U
1 Go to commentsSabbaticals have helped keep NZ’s very best talent in the country on long term deals - this fact has been left out of this article. Much like the articles calling to allow overseas players to be selected, yet can only name one player currently not signed to NZR who would be selected for the ABs. And in the entire history of NZ players leaving to play overseas, literally only 4 or 5 have left in their prime as current ABs. (Piatau, Evans, Hayman, Mo’unga,?) Yes Carter got an injury while playing in France 16 years ago, but he also got a tournament ending injury at the 2011 World Cup while taking mid-week practice kicks at goal. Maybe Jordie gets a season-ending injury while playing in Ireland, maybe he gets one next week against the Brumbies. NZR have many shortcomings, but keeping the very best players in the country and/or available for ABs selection is not one of them. Likewise for workload management - players missing 2 games out of 14 is hardly a big deal in the grand scheme of things. Again let’s use some facts - did it stop the Crusaders winning SR so many times consecutively when during any given week they would be missing 2 of their best players? The whole idea of the sabbatical is to reward your best players who are willing to sign very long term deals with some time to do whatever they want. They are not handed out willy-nilly, and at nowhere near the levels that would somehow devalue Super Rugby. In this particular example JB is locked in with NZR for what will probably (hopefully) be the best years of his career, hard to imagine him not sticking around for a couple more after for a Lions tour and one more world cup. He has the potential to become the most capped AB of all time. A much better outcome than him leaving NZ for a minimum of 3 years at the age of 27, unlikely to ever play for the ABs again, which would be the likely alternative.
2 Go to commentsJake White talks more sense than anything I've read in the last 5 years. Hope someone's listening.
9 Go to commentsThe Springboks tried going down the road of only picking home-based players and it was an unmitigated disaster in 2016 and 2017. Picking overseas-based players has been one of the main reason the Boks have done so well since 2018, not only because of the quality Rassie could call on, but because of the knowledge and experience those players brought into camp from England, France and Japan. With some of the big names playing abroad it also gave younger players in SA the chance to break through at franchise level. Would we have seen the emergence of a Ruan Nortje if RG and Lood were still at the Bulls? Not so sure. I understand why Jake would want to block players leaving since his job depends on good results but it’s an approach that would take Bok rugby back to the bad old days and no South African wants to see that.
9 Go to commentsExeter were thumped by 38 points. And they only had to hop on a train.
39 Go to commentsI am De Groot.
1 Go to commentsHad hoped you might write an article on this game, Nick. It’s a good one. Things have not gone as smoothly for ROG since beating Leinster last year at the Aviva in the CC final. LAR had the Top 14 Final won till Raymond Rhule missed a simple tackle on the excellent Ntamack, and Toulouse reaped the rewards of just staying in the fight till the death. Then the disruption of the RWC this season. LAR have not handled that well, but they were not alone, and we saw Pau heading the Top 14 table at one stage early season. I would think one of the reasons for the poor showing would have to be that the younger players coming through, and the more mature amongst the group outside the top 25/30, are not as strong as would be hoped for. I note that Romain Sazy retired at the end of last season. He had been with LAR since 2010, and was thus one of their foundation players when they were promoted to Top 14. Records show he ended up with 336 games played with LAR. That is some experience, some rock in the team. He has been replaced for the most part by Ultan Dillane. At 30, Dillane is not young, but given the chances, he may be a fair enough replacement for Sazy. But that won’be for more than a few years. I honestly know little of the pathways into the LAR setup from within France. I did read somewhere a couple of years ago that on the way up to Top 14, the club very successfully picked up players from the academies of other French teams who were not offered places by those teams. These guys were often great signings…can’t find the article right now, so can’t name any….but the Tadgh Beirne type players. So all in all, it will be interesting to see where the replacements for all the older players come from. Only Lleyd’s and Rhule from SA currently, both backs. So maybe a few SA forwards ?? By contrast, Leinster have a pretty clear line of good players coming through in the majority of positions. Props maybe a weak spot ? And they are very fleet footed and shrewd in appointing very good coaches. Or maybe it is also true that very good coaches do very well in the Leinster setup. So, Nick, I would fully concurr that “On the evidence of Saturday’s semi-final between the two clubs, the rebuild in the Bay of Biscay is going to take longer than it is on the east coast of Ireland”
11 Go to commentsWhat was the excuse for the other knockout blowouts then? Does the result not prove the Saints were just so much better? Wise call to put your eggs in one basket when you’ve got 2 comps simultaneously finishing.
39 Go to commentsReally hope Kuruvoli and his partner rock the Canes.
1 Go to commentsI wonder what impact Samson has had on their attack, as the team seems less prone to trundle it up the middle, take the tackle and then trundle it up again. I lost faith in the coach last year as the Rebelss looked like a 2nd/3rd rate South African team. I also disliked Gordon standing back, often ignored as the forward battle went on and on. Maybe its our Aussie way of not getting off our A***’s until the enemy is at the gate.
86 Go to commentsThanks for the write up. Great to see the Rebs winning, I am a little interested in how they will go against the remaining kiwi teams, I think they’ve only played Hurricanes and Highlanders but how great to see these players performing!! I also see Parling has a job beyond June 30! A good move by RA? Also how do you fix the Rebels previously scratchy defence?
86 Go to commentsbe smart - go black
14 Go to commentsNext week the Crusaders hopefully have Scott Barrett back. Will be great to have the captain back. Hopefully he will be the All Black captain as well.
12 Go to comments