Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

How the Super Rugby Pacific finals series could impact the competition

By Tom Vinicombe
(Photo by Getty Images)

When the format for the inaugural Super Rugby Pacific competition was announced, fans had one major trepidation.

ADVERTISEMENT

The fact that some teams would have slightly easier draws due to the fact that they would each play three additional matches on top of their one-off games against every other side was a small issue, amplified when the draw was adjusted due to Covid.

But the bigger gripe was with the eight-team finals series.

Just 12 teams are taking part in Super Rugby Pacific, meaning that three-quarters of the competitors will qualify for the knockout matches at the end of the season. On the one hand, it means that there likely won’t be too many dead-rubber matches throughout the competition but on the other, it means the stakes aren’t especially high throughout the year; even if you drop well over half your games, you could still feature in the finals.

Video Spacer

There’s a massive void in South Africa rugby, according to Jake White.

Video Spacer

There’s a massive void in South Africa rugby, according to Jake White.

It’s a stark contrast to last year’s Super Rugby Aotearoa and AU competitions, where the competition was so fierce and every game mattered. That pressure was turned up to 11 in Super Rugby Trans-Tasman, where the Crusaders missed out on playing in the grand final despite winning all five of their matches, with an average margin of almost 20 points.

This year, that pressure is going to be turned down considerably but, at least according to Chiefs head coach Clayton McMillan, that won’t significantly change how teams approach each match.

Related

“Our mindset is to win every game,” he said last week. “It’s dangerous territory to think that you can sneak your way into the top eight and then work your way to the top. There’s always advantages to being further up the ladder than there is down the bottom.

“We certainly don’t want to get to the last few games and have to be worrying about winning games or needing other teams to give us any favours.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Normally that advantage would be getting to play in front of a packed home crowd but with Covid continuing to cause issues, that’s not guaranteed this year. Already, the New Zealand-based sides are relocating to Queenstown for the opening weeks of the competition where matches will be played at neutral venues (except, of course, in the Highlanders’ case), likely with limited crowds able to attend.

With NZ’s strict travel regulations, there’s also a very real possibility that the latter half of the competition could be played in its entirety in Australia, which would again minimise any benefits of being the ‘home team’ in a play-off situation.

Of course, the other benefit of a higher seeding is easier fixtures in the formative stages of the finals but while that may keep you in the competition a little longer, you would still need to beat the best teams to win the trophy at the end of the day.

As such, the benefits of a higher ranking in the 2022 finals could be relatively minimal.

ADVERTISEMENT

Related

There is one major pro of an extended finals series, especially after the way the past two seasons have played out.

With every game so important throughout 2020 and 2021, coaches were rarely able to deviate from their preferred line-ups. There were never any easy matches (at least during the Aotearoa and AU competitions), so the likes of Richie Mo’unga, Damian McKenzie and Rieko Ioane were required to suit up week after week. In some ways, it really hindered the development of New Zealand and Australia’s next tier of players coming through the ranks.

In 2022, things might look a bit different in that regard – not that you should expect to see wholesale changes every week by any stretch of the imagination.

“What a longer competition does is it probably gives you a little bit more scope to rotate your players a little bit,” McMillan said. “But we all know that cohesion, getting the majority of your starters out regularly playing together pays dividends in the long run so that’ll kind of be our strategy.

So while there should be some more diversity in selection than we’ve become accustomed to over the past two seasons, the extended play-off series shouldn’t lead to any complacency in 2022.

Super Rugby Pacific kicks off on February 17 with Moana Pasifika taking on the Blues.

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Fresh Starts | Episode 1 | Will Skelton

ABBIE WARD: A BUMP IN THE ROAD

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 9

James Cook | The Big Jim Show | Full Episode

New Zealand victorious in TENSE final | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Men's Highlights

New Zealand crowned BACK-TO-BACK champions | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Women's Highlights

Japan Rugby League One | Bravelupus v Steelers | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

S
Sam T 3 hours ago
Jake White: Let me clear up some things

I remember towards the end of the original broadcasting deal for Super rugby with Newscorp that there was talk about the competition expanding to improve negotiations for more money - more content, more cash. Professional rugby was still in its infancy then and I held an opposing view that if Super rugby was a truly valuable competition then it should attract more broadcasters to bid for the rights, thereby increasing the value without needing to add more teams and games. Unfortunately since the game turned professional, the tension between club, talent and country has only grown further. I would argue we’re already at a point in time where the present is the future. The only international competitions that matter are 6N, RC and RWC. The inter-hemisphere tours are only developmental for those competitions. The games that increasingly matter more to fans, sponsors and broadcasters are between the clubs. Particularly for European fans, there are multiple competitions to follow your teams fortunes every week. SA is not Europe but competes in a single continental competition, so the travel component will always be an impediment. It was worse in the bloated days of Super rugby when teams traversed between four continents - Africa, America, Asia and Australia. The percentage of players who represent their country is less than 5% of the professional player base, so the sense of sacrifice isn’t as strong a motivation for the rest who are more focused on playing professional rugby and earning as much from their body as they can. Rugby like cricket created the conundrum it’s constantly fighting a losing battle with.

3 Go to comments
E
Ed the Duck 10 hours ago
How Leinster neutralised 'long-in-the-tooth' La Rochelle

Hey Nick, your match analysis is decent but the top and tail not so much, a bit more random. For a start there’s a seismic difference in regenerating any club side over a test team. EJ pretty much had to urinate with the appendage he’d been given at test level whereas club success is impacted hugely by the budget. Look no further than Boudjellal’s Toulon project for a perfect example. The set ups at La Rochelle and Leinster are like chalk and cheese and you are correct that Leinster are ahead. Leinster are not just slightly ahead though, they are light years ahead on their plans, with the next gen champions cup team already blooded, seasoned and developing at speed from their time manning the fort in the URC while the cream play CC and tests. They have engineered a strong talent conveyor belt into their system, supported by private money funnelled into a couple of Leinster private schools. The really smart move from Leinster and the IRFU however is maximising the Irish Revenue tax breaks (tax relief on the best 10 years earnings refunded at retirement) to help keep all of their stars in Ireland and happy, while simultaneously funding marquee players consistently. And of course Barrett is the latest example. But in no way is he a “replacement for Henshaw”, he’s only there for one season!!! As for Rob Baxter, the best advice you can give him is to start lobbying Parliament and HMRC for a similar state subsidy, but don’t hold your breath… One thing Cullen has been very smart with is his coaching team. Very quickly he realised his need to supplement his skills, there was talk of him exiting after his first couple of years but he was extremely shrewd bringing in Lancaster and now Nienaber. That has worked superbly and added a layer that really has made a tangible difference. Apart from that you were bang on the money… 😉😂

5 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE Glimmers of positivity but Welsh rugby not moving anywhere fast Glimmers of positivity but Welsh rugby not moving anywhere fast
Search