Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Highlanders player ratings vs Force | Super Rugby Pacific

Aaron Smith of the Highlanders charges forward during the round four Super Rugby Pacific match between Highlanders and Western Force at Invercargill Rugby Park, on March 19, 2023, in Invercargill, New Zealand. (Photo by Joe Allison/Getty Images)

Losing All Black Shannon Frizell two minutes before kickoff to a groin injury wasn’t an ideal start for the Highlanders as they took on the Western Force in the deep south in Invercargill.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Force took advantage of ill-discipline from the home side to build a 6-0 lead early before the Highlanders opened the try scoring through Jonah Lowe. A second strike right on half-time gave them a 15-13 lead.

Early kicking and errors plagued the Highlanders with five handling errors in the first 25 minutes, but they maintained set-piece dominance over the Force at scrum. The visitors had ascendency at the maul.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

After seven lead changes the Highlanders pulled away to secure a 43-35 victory and their first win of the season. Here’s how they rated:

1. Ethan de Groot – 3.5

Coughed up possession on a pick and go in the first half. A couple of off-target passes as the lead pod runner. Gave effort in defence and at the breakdown when needed, but otherwise switched off and took rest. Well below All Black standard but could be part of planned game management. Off at 45.

2. Andrew Makalio – N/A

Suffered a nasty head knock going low into the hip of fullback Chase Tiatia on a kick return. Off in 17th.

Early offside penalty gave Force three points but offered some strong carries and clean outs. Was one of the best forwards for the Highlanders in terms of intensity. Off at 73 min after a big ticker performance.

4. Fabian Holland – 3.5

ADVERTISEMENT

Early take at the lineout but an early offside penalty was indicative of his afternoon. Big body still learning his trade, coaches clearly weren’t impressed with something. Off at 31 mins.

5. Josh Bekhuis – 6

The Southland boys product back from Japan returned for a new second row partnership with Dutch-born Holland. Strong defence. Had a big effort on a Force maul to disarm it late in first half. Solid work at the lineout to run the side’s calls.

6. Sean Withy – 6.5

Inserted into the line-up after Shannon Frizell was scratched in the warm-up. Competed hard at the rucks. Slipped off a tackle on Tiatia but maintained a high work rate. Industrious showing. Effort was not a question as he was everywhere. Rewarded with a try after running a good line against the grain.

ADVERTISEMENT

7. Billy Harmon – 5

Produced a beautiful offload on an early Highlanders’ attack. Gave away a few penalties at the breakdown through a lack of execution.

8. Hugh Renton – 8.5

Big effort early in defence and in the carry that continued throughout. Stood up and led the Landers’ pack by action. Made some key carries to build front foot momentum including in the lead-up to Gilbert’s try. Finished the afternoon with a try following two touches on the left edge and getting the last pass back inside. Best on field for the home side.

9. Aaron Smith – 7

Pushed the pass searching for an opportunity early as the Highlanders lacked a bit patience in the first half. Capitalised on Umaga-Jensen’s first break with some good tempo and an assist for Jonah Lowe. Defended very well.

Got unfortunately beaten in a foot race by a smart kick over the top on the blindside by English wing speedster Zach Kirbirge with Landers down a man. Off at 62 mins.

10. Mitch Hunt – 7

Great try-saver early on the Force’s first break but kicked a bit too deep with a poor chase line. Had a grubber charged on first phase from a lineout launch. Highlanders’ kicking game wasn’t effective.

Went for a bold intercept attempt with a try on offer for the Force and only got one hand to it, leading to a yellow card. Made amends on his return by scoring the second try at a critical time right on half-time. A nice short ball onto Sam Gilbert for a try assist in the second.

Added some spark to the Highlanders attack when needed.

11. Jonah Lowe – 6

Had a mixed day with limited opportunities, but still scored two tries. Won a turnover at the ruck in the first half. Scored the first try off a flat Aaron Smith pass and another late off Mitch Hunt close to the line.

12. Thomas Umaga-Jensen – 8.5

Focal point of the attack all day. Had some big carries off set-piece early, breaking the line in the 13th minute which led to the Highlanders’ first try. A nice offload for Timu on another.

Made some big plays on defence forcing a couple of key turnovers after strong tackles. Strong all-round performance from one of the Landers’ best on the day.

13. Josh Timu – 6

Awful pass first up with a round-the-back flick, got back into the game with some solid defence. Had a good partnership with Umaga-Jensen through the afternoon.

14. Martin Bogado – 6

Long kicking option for the Highlanders in the backfield. Strong defence on the edge with good low chop tackles. A reliable performance with good execution, didn’t put a foot wrong.

15. Sam Gilbert – 6.5

Had a rough introduction to Tony Pulu when he was sat down on the left hand touchline. A nice kick in behind on a set-piece launch from the midfield. A smart line for a try close to the line in the second half and had a hand in the last try with a nice break and inside pass. Offered a big punt but was part of the kicking group whose kick decisions bordered on aimless at times.

Reserves

16. Rhys Marshall – 6 – on in 17th. Performed his core role well. Had a nice touch finder with a 50/22 late in the 2nd half.
17. Ayden Johnstone – 5 – on in 45th. Brought energy straight away but Landers scrum and maul was a mixed bag with the reserves on.

18. PJ Sheck – N/A – on at 73.

19. Max Hicks – 6 – on in 31st. Reliable lineout target for the Landers. A solid showing by Hicks.

20. James Lentjes – N/A – on at 80

21. Folau Fakatava – 5 – on in 62nd. Brought some impact late in the game with a nice half-break after a big dummy around the ruck. Gave away an offside penalty at scrum time which let the Force out of their 22.

22. Cameron Millar – N/A – on at 80 for his sixty second debut.

23. Connor Garden-Bachop didn’t get on

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 5 hours ago
Six former All Blacks eligible for new nations in 2025

He wasn't, he was only there a couple of years. Don't get me wrong, he's a player of promise, but without ever having a season at 10 at that level, one could hardly ever think he would be in line to take over.


But if you really want to look at your question deeper, we get to that much fabled "production line" of the Crusaders. I predict you'll know what I mean when I say, Waikato, Waikato, Queensland.


I don't know everything about him (or his area I mean) but sure, it wouldnt have just been Razor that invested in him, and that's not to say he's the only 10 to have come out of that academy in the last half dozen years/decade since Mo'unga, but he is probably the best. So it's a matter of there having been no one else why it was so easy for people to picture him being razors heir apparent (no doubt he holds him in more high regard than the blurb/reference of his recently published though). And in general there is very much a no paching policy at that level which you may not appreciate .


For England? Really? That's interesting. I had just assumed he was viewed as club man and that national aspect was just used to entice him over. I mean he could stil be used by Scotland given I wouldn't expect them to have a whole lot of depth even thoe fh's one of their strongest positions at the moment. But certainly not England.


Personally I still think that far more likely was the reason. He would/could have done the same for Crusaders and NZ, just without half as much in his pocket. And as an individual I certainly don't think he'd have chosen England over the All Blacks (as a tru blue kiwi i mean), and he of all people should know where he sits. He said he wants to play internationally, so I take that at face value, he didn't think that could be for NZ, and he might have underestimated (or been mislead by McCall) England (and Scotland really), or have already chosen Scotland at the time, as seems the case from talk of his addition.


Again though, he's a player who I'd happily rate outside the trifecta of Barrett/McKenzie/Mo'unga in basic ability , even on par with foreign players like Plummer, Sopoaga, Ioane, and ahead of a bunch in his era like Falcon, Trask, Reihana. I've done the same thing >.< excluding Perofeta from the 10 debate. Hes probably below him but I think pero is a 15 now.

31 Go to comments
J
JW 7 hours ago
Six former All Blacks eligible for new nations in 2025

What do you mean should?


Are you asking these questions because you think they are important reasons a player should decide to represent a country?


I think that is back the front. They are good reasons why someone 'would' be able to choose Fiji (say in the case of Mo'unga's cousin who the Drua brought into their environment), but not reason's why they "should". Those need to be far more personal imo.


If you think it was me suggesting he "should" play for Fiji, I certainly wasn't suggesting that. I was merely suggesting he would/could because ther'ye very close to his heart with his dad having represented them.


I did go on to say the right sort of environment should be created to encourage them to want to represent Fiji (as with case of their european stars it's always a fine balance between wanting to play for them and other factors (like compared with personal develop at their club). but that is also not trying to suggest those players should want to play for Fiji simply because you make the prospect better, you're simply allowing for it to happen.


TLDR I actually sent you to the wrong post, I was thinking more about my reply to HU's sentiments with yours. Instead of running you around I'll just paste it in

What's wrong with that? Hoskins Sotutu could be selected for the Maori All Blacks, then go on latter and move to England and represent them, then once his career in England (no longer at that standard) is over move to Japan and finish his career playing for Fiji. Why should he not be able to represent any or all of those teams?

Actually I can't remember if it was that message or whether it indeed was my hypothetical Fiji example that I wanted to suggest would improve the International game, not cheapen it.


I suppose I have to try and explain that idea further now. So you say it cheapens the game. They game is already "cheap" when a nation like Fiji is only really allowed to get their full team going in a WC year. Or even it's the players themselves only caring about showing up in a WC year. To me this is a problem because a Fiji campaign/season isn't comparable to their competitors (in a situation where they're say ranked in the top 8. Take last year for instance. Many stars were absent of the Pacific Nations Cup, for whatever reason, but hey, when their team is touring a big EU nation like England or Ireland, wow suddenly theyre a high profile team again and they get the stars back.


Great right? No. Having those players come back was probably detrimental to the teams performance. My idea of having Sotutu and Bower encouraged (directly or indirectly) to play for Fiji is merely as a means to an end, to give the Flying Fijians the profile to both enrich and more accurately reflect the international game. You didn't really state what you dislike but it's easy to guess, and yes, this idea does utilize that aspect which does devalue the game in other cases, so I wanted to see if this picture would change that in this example (just and idea I was throwing out their, like I also said in my post, I don't actually think Sotutu or any of these players are going anywhere, even Ioane might still be hopeful of being slected).


The idea again, raise the visibility on the PNC so that can stand as a valued tournament on it's own and not require basic funded by WR to continue, but not enough to involve all the best players (even Japan treated it as a chance to play it's amatuers). Do this by hosting the PI island pool in places like Melbourne every other year, include some very high profile and influential team in it like an All Black team, and yes, by the nations getting together and creating ways to increase it's popularity by say asking individuals like Sotutu and Bower to strength it's marketability, with the hopeful follow on affect that stars like Botia and Radradra always want to (and can) represent their country. With Fiji as the example, but do it with Samoa and Tonga as well. They will need NZ and Aus (Japan) assistance to make a reality imo.


I don't believe this cheapens the game, I believe it makes it more valued as you're giving players the choice of who they chose to play for rather than basing it off money. Sotutu would never have forgone his paycheck to play for Fiji instead of NZ at the beginning, so you should viewed his current choice as 'cheap'

31 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ 'The hairdryer treatment is like caviar, you don't use it very often' 'The hairdryer treatment is like caviar, you don't use it very often'
Search