Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

'He's got a full on bite mark' - Stormers lock could face citing over incident

By Ian Cameron
Niall Scannell of Munster appeals to a touch judge about an alledged biting incident by an opponent during the United Rugby Championship match between Munster and DHL Stormers at Thomond Park in Limerick. (Photo By Sam Barnes/Sportsfile via Getty Images)

Munster and Stormers have been left waiting to see whether or not an alleged biting incident that occurred during their match at Thomond Park on the weekend will be taken further.

ADVERTISEMENT

Munster came away with a 34 – 18 win in the United Rugby Championship second round encounter, but an apparent biting incident has left a sour taste in the home side’s mouth.

Munster hooker Niall Scannell emerged from a ruck after tussling with Stormers lock Adré Smith as Jean Kleyn scored his 45th minute try. Scannell remonstrated with the assistant referee before showing referee Andrew Brace his upper thigh.

Video Spacer

The Journeyman Ollie Phillips on Lomu, Madonna & The Moulin Rouge | RugbyPass Offload | Episode 3

Video Spacer

The Journeyman Ollie Phillips on Lomu, Madonna & The Moulin Rouge | RugbyPass Offload | Episode 3

Brace then ordered a TMO review of the incident.

During his deliberation, Munster captain Peter O’Mahoney could be heard telling Brace: “Yeah, 100 per cent, but he [Scannell] has got a full on bite mark.”

Brace felt that the footage as reviewed at the time was not sufficient to warrant an onfield action – which would have been a red card – though Smith could be seen with his head between Scannell’s legs and his face pressed against the hooker’s upper thigh.

“If there’s anything clear the citing officer will deal with it,” concluded Brace, before the game resumed.

Munster head coach Johan van Graan addressed the incident, saying: “Niall reported that to Pete (O’Mahony) on the pitch, the referee had a look at it, they couldn’t see any evidence of it, but we’ll go through the right channels.

ADVERTISEMENT

“He will be (examined). We haven’t spoken to the medical team as such but that will take place later tonight, any player who reports anything to the medical team will be looked at.”

Smith – who was making his debut for the Stormers – could face a minimum entry-level ban of 12 weeks for a biting offence, should he be cited and found guilty. Biting is considered one of the most heinous acts under Regulation 17 and can receive a maximum ban of up to four years.

The citing commissioner has 48 hours to make his decision on whether or not to pursue the incident.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Fresh Starts | Episode 1 | Will Skelton

ABBIE WARD: A BUMP IN THE ROAD

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 9

James Cook | The Big Jim Show | Full Episode

New Zealand victorious in TENSE final | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Men's Highlights

New Zealand crowned BACK-TO-BACK champions | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Women's Highlights

Japan Rugby League One | Bravelupus v Steelers | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

N
Nickers 6 hours ago
All Blacks sabbaticals ‘damage Super Rugby Pacific when it is fighting for survival’

Sabbaticals have helped keep NZ’s very best talent in the country on long term deals - this fact has been left out of this article. Much like the articles calling to allow overseas players to be selected, yet can only name one player currently not signed to NZR who would be selected for the ABs. And in the entire history of NZ players leaving to play overseas, literally only 4 or 5 have left in their prime as current ABs. (Piatau, Evans, Hayman, Mo’unga,?) Yes Carter got an injury while playing in France 16 years ago, but he also got a tournament ending injury at the 2011 World Cup while taking mid-week practice kicks at goal. Maybe Jordie gets a season-ending injury while playing in Ireland, maybe he gets one next week against the Brumbies. NZR have many shortcomings, but keeping the very best players in the country and/or available for ABs selection is not one of them. Likewise for workload management - players missing 2 games out of 14 is hardly a big deal in the grand scheme of things. Again let’s use some facts - did it stop the Crusaders winning SR so many times consecutively when during any given week they would be missing 2 of their best players? The whole idea of the sabbatical is to reward your best players who are willing to sign very long term deals with some time to do whatever they want. They are not handed out willy-nilly, and at nowhere near the levels that would somehow devalue Super Rugby. In this particular example JB is locked in with NZR for what will probably (hopefully) be the best years of his career, hard to imagine him not sticking around for a couple more after for a Lions tour and one more world cup. He has the potential to become the most capped AB of all time. A much better outcome than him leaving NZ for a minimum of 3 years at the age of 27, unlikely to ever play for the ABs again, which would be the likely alternative.

3 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING The 124kg 'enforcer' Matfield tips to 'take over' from Etzebeth The 124kg 'enforcer' Matfield tips to 'take over' from Etzebeth
Search