Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

Gloucester sign trio of Worcester Warriors

By PA
Finn Theobald-Thomas of Worcester Warriors reacts after conceding a try during the Premiership Rugby Cup match between Gloucester and Worcester Warriors at Kingsholm Stadium on September 21, 2022 in Gloucester, England. (Photo by Michael Steele/Getty Images)

Gallagher Premiership club Gloucester have signed three players from crisis-hit Worcester.

ADVERTISEMENT

Centres Alex Searle and Seb Atkinson, together with hooker Finn Theobald-Thomas, have become the latest trio to leave the Warriors.

Gloucester said they linked up with the squad on Monday.

Worcester are currently in administration, while they were partially liquidated with HM Revenue and Customs pursuing unpaid tax in the region of £6million.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

Worcester were suspended from the Premiership and face relegation at the end of this season.

A number of players have departed Sixways, including Scotland wing Duhan van der Merwe, England centre Ollie Lawrence, club captain Ted Hill, fly-half Fin Smith, plus locks Joe Batley and Andrew Kitchener.

Hearle spent six years at Worcester, while Atkinson links up with Gloucester following a two-season stint in the west midlands and 19-year-old Theobald-Thomas is a Warriors academy product.

“The opportunity arose to explore bringing in further additions to our squad, and we are really pleased to welcome Alex, Seb and Finn,” Gloucester chief operating officer Alex Brown said.

“They are three young players who have a very bright future in the game, and we are confident that they will add another layer of depth to our squad.

ADVERTISEMENT

Related

“Alex really kicked on last season to establish himself as a regular Premiership player. He has got a well-rounded game and is a natural finisher.

“Seb and Finn are both players who were beginning to make an impact for the Warriors.”

In their latest statement, Worcester’s administrators Begbies Traynor said that discussions were continuing with a number of interested parties.

“We are not yet at a stage to be able to enter into any preferred bidder agreement, but expect to continue discussions around this with a view to achieving a sale in the timescale needed for a squad to be built by a purchaser in good time for next season,” Begbies Traynor said.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Fresh Starts | Episode 1 | Will Skelton

ABBIE WARD: A BUMP IN THE ROAD

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 8

James Cook | The Big Jim Show | Full Episode

New Zealand victorious in TENSE final | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Men's Highlights

New Zealand crowned BACK-TO-BACK champions | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Women's Highlights

Japan Rugby League One | Steelers v Sungoliath | Full Match Replay

Rugby Europe Women's Championship | Netherlands v Spain

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

S
Senzo Cicero 17 hours ago
'If the South Africans are in, they need to be all in'

1. True, if that “free” ticket means access to all but the prized exhibit - EVIP only. SA cannot host semis, even if they’ve earned it (see Sharks vs ASM Clermont Auvergne at… Twickenham Stoop). 2. Why no selective outrage over Lyon doing the exact same thing a week earlier? Out of all the countries France send the most “B teams”, why nobody talking about “disrespect” and “prioritising domestic leagues” and “kicking them out”? 3. Why no mention of the Sharks fielding all of their Springboks for the second rate Challenge cup QF? No commitment? 4. Why no mention of all the SA teams qualifying for respective euro knock out comps in the two seasons they’ve been in it? How many euro teams have qualified for KO’s in their history? Can’t compete? 5. Why no mention of SA teams beating French and English giants La Rochelle and Saracens? How many euro teams have done that in their history? Add no quality? The fact is that SA teams are only in their second season in europe, with no status and a fraction of the resources. Since joining the URC, SA has seen a repatriation of a number of players, and this will only grow once SA start sharing in the profits of competing in these comps, meaning bigger squads with greater depth and quality, meaning they don’t have to prioritise comps as they have to now - they don’t have imports from Pacifica and South America and everywhere else in between like “European” teams have - also less “Saffas” in Prem and T14, that’s what we want right? 'If the South Africans are in, they need to be all in' True, and we have to ensure we give them the same status and resources as we give everyone else to do just that. A small compromise on scheduling will go a long way in avoiding these situations, but guess what, France and England wont compromise on scheduling because they ironically… prioritise their domestic comps, go figure!

21 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE Taine Plumtree: 'I couldn't blame them for saying 'Who the hell is this guy?' Taine Plumtree: 'I couldn't blame them for saying 'Who the hell is this guy?'
Search