Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

Former England cross-code convert Sam Burgess found guilty of intimidating father-in-law

By AAP
(Photo by Shaun Botterill/Getty Images)

Former South Sydney NRL captain Sam Burgess has been convicted of intimidating his then wife’s father, former mining lobbyist Mitchell Hooke.

ADVERTISEMENT

A NSW magistrate on Friday found the 32-year-old had yelled “f*** you, I’m going to get you” 20 centimetres from Mr Hooke’s face during an expletive-riddled rage, sparked when Burgess was asked to leave the Hookes’ Southern Highlands property in October 2019.

“I accept Mr Hooke was terrified, that his whole body went cold,” magistrate Robert Rabbidge said in Moss Vale Local Court.

Video Spacer

Wilkinson and Townsend reflect on the Calcutta Cup:

Video Spacer

Wilkinson and Townsend reflect on the Calcutta Cup:

Burgess was found guilty of intimidation, having intended to cause Mr Hooke fear of physical or mental harm.

The retired star was sentenced to a two-year community corrections order, requiring him to be of good behaviour.

“I’m confused with the decision, I will appeal the decision and I won’t say anything further,” Burgess told reporters as he left court.

Burgess had denied swearing in the home and cast the father of his estranged wife Phoebe Burgess as the aggressor

ADVERTISEMENT

Ultimately Burgess’s own words undermined his defence, the magistrate found.

The former footballer conceded his father-in-law did exclaim “What are you going to do? Hit a 64-year-old man?” during the incident.

But – disputing Mr Hooke’s evidence that the statement came after Burgess aggressively yelled centimetres from his face – Burgess said it occurred when the men were metres apart on the property’s driveway angrily cursing each other.

“Surely such words could only be uttered after a close encounter,” the magistrate said.

Burgess also texted his estranged wife 20 minutes after the encounter that her father had been “provoking me”.

“I find the words used … (is) a concession on his part that he was the aggressor,” Mr Rabbidge said.

ADVERTISEMENT

Noting people in a highly emotional state can say things they later regret, the magistrate accepted Burgess had become annoyed and angry when told to leave the Hookes ‘ Daffodil Downs property in Glenquarry before Ms Burgess returned.

Mr Hooke in October testified his own calm words were rebutted with “f*** you, I’m going to get you, you orchestrated all of this”.

“Six foot five, 118 kilograms, threatening to hit me, I was terrified,” Mr Hooke told the court.

“I had never felt fear like it. My whole body went cold.”

Mr Rabbidge said Mr Hooke’s version was clear and concise, as opposed to the defendant’s “changeable” testimony.

“What is incontrovertible is the shock and distress that Mr Hooke displayed to his daughters and police,” the magistrate said.

Burgess’s legal team had alleged Mr Hooke and Ms Burgess set out to harm Burgess’ career and reputation by making the allegation and orchestrating a damaging expose on the retired Rabbitoh published by News Corp Australia in October 2020.

“I do not accept that Mr Hooke was so spiteful that he would set out to make a false claim to harm Mr Burgess’s career,” the magistrate said.

Burgess retired in 2019 after a 270-game NRL and English Super League career and stints with England’s national rugby union and rugby league sides.

He stood down from roles as a commentator and South Sydney assistant coach in October.

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Fresh Starts | Episode 2 | Sam Whitelock

Royal Navy Men v Royal Air Force Men | Full Match Replay

Royal Navy Women v Royal Air Force Women | Full Match Replay

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 9

James Cook | The Big Jim Show | Full Episode

New Zealand victorious in TENSE final | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Men's Highlights

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

F
Flankly 11 hours ago
The AI advantage: How the next two Rugby World Cups will be won

If rugby wants to remain interesting in the AI era then it will need to work on changing the rules. AI will reduce the tactical advantage of smart game plans, will neutralize primary attacking weapons, and will move rugby from a being a game of inches to a game of millimetres. It will be about sheer athleticism and technique,about avoiding mistakes, and about referees. Many fans will find that boring. The answer is to add creative degrees of freedom to the game. The 50-22 is an example. But we can have fun inventing others, like the right to add more players for X minutes per game, or the equivalent of the 2-point conversion in American football, the ability to call a 12-player scrum, etc. Not saying these are great ideas, but making the point that the more of these alternatives you allow, the less AI will be able to lock down high-probability strategies. This is not because AI does not have the compute power, but because it has more choices and has less data, or less-specific data. That will take time and debate, but big, positive and immediate impact could be in the area of ref/TMO assistance. The technology is easily good enough today to detect forward passes, not-straight lineouts, offside at breakdown/scrum/lineout, obstruction, early/late tackles, and a lot of other things. WR should be ultra aggressive in doing this, as it will really help in an area in which the game is really struggling. In the long run there needs to be substantial creativity applied to the rules. Without that AI (along with all of the pro innovations) will turn rugby into a bash fest.

24 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE Chasing the American dream Chasing the American dream
Search