Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

England fans label John Mitchell's contract extension a risk

By Josh Raisey
Defence coach John Mitchell runs the rule over Billy Vunipola at England training during the 2019 Six Nations (Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images)

England fans were given the news on Thursday that defence coach John Mitchell has signed a deal with the Rugby Football Union to keep him in his role until 2021. 

ADVERTISEMENT

The news also came with the confirmation that Eddie Jones will also remain in his position as head coach until 2021, which had been expected. 

Mitchell has clearly made an impact since teaming up with England last summer, as they were at their lowest point under Jones. He teamed up with the Australian after England had finished fifth in the 2018 Six Nations and had lost a summer series against South Africa. 

The subsequent autumn internationals saw a marked difference in the England team, as did the 2019  Six Nations where England’s attritional defence came to the fore. It was only in the 38-38 draw with Scotland that England’s fragility was exposed. Nonetheless, Mitchell’s influence was certainly noticed. 

However, some fans still feel that his new deal is a risk ahead of a World Cup, as England’s performance in Japan should be what determines whether he gets a new contract or not. This would leave all parties involved in an awkward situation after the World Cup should England perform in the same way they did in 2015. 

England made a similar mistake in 2014, where Stuart Lancaster was given a contract lasting until 2020, which obviously never came to fruition as he left his post just over a year later. The fear here is that history could be repeating itself. This is what the fans have said:

https://twitter.com/1MattWilkinson/status/1139128886996996101?s=20

https://twitter.com/StevePhillipsXV/status/1138950674136412165?s=20

What is also a concern among fans is whether Mitchell is being lined up to replace Jones as head coach in 2021. While he has done a marvellous job under Jones, some are questioning whether he will be able to step up to the head coach. 

ADVERTISEMENT

Mitchell’s record as a head coach is not particularly flattering, and with the wealth of talent that the Premiership has currently such as Mark McCall, Rob Baxter and former Northampton coach Jim Mallinder, some fans feel England could be best served looking towards these.

The emphasis during Jones’ tenure with England has been to create a succession plan for the years after his departure. This may be the first sign of that plan, but it has not pleased everyone.

WATCH: Part one of the two-part RugbyPass documentary on what fans can expect in Japan at this year’s World Cup

ADVERTISEMENT
Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 11

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Pacific Four Series 2024 | Canada vs USA

Japan Rugby League One | Verblitz v Eagles | Full Match Replay

Fresh Starts | Episode 2 | Sam Whitelock

Royal Navy Men v Royal Air Force Men | Full Match Replay

Royal Navy Women v Royal Air Force Women | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
Jon 7 hours ago
The case for keeping the Melbourne Rebels in Super Rugby Pacific

I have heard it asked if RA is essentially one of the part owners and I suppose therefor should be on the other side of these two parties. If they purchased the rebels and guaranteed them, and are responsible enough they incur Rebels penalties, where is this line drawn? Seems rough to have to pay a penalty for something were your involvement sees you on the side of the conned party, the creditors. If the Rebels directors themselves have given the club their money, 6mil worth right, why aren’t they also listed as sitting with RA and the Tax office? And the legal threat was either way, new Rebels or defunct, I can’t see how RA assume the threat was less likely enough to warrant comment about it in this article. Surely RA ignore that and only worry about whether they can defend it or not, which they have reported as being comfortable with. So in effect wouldn’t it be more accurate to say there is no further legal threat (or worry) in denying the deal. Unless the directors have reneged on that. > Returns of a Japanese team or even Argentinean side, the Jaguares, were said to be on the cards, as were the ideas of standing up brand new teams in Hawaii or even Los Angeles – crazy ideas that seemingly forgot the time zone issues often cited as a turn-off for viewers when the competition contained teams from South Africa. Those timezones are great for SR and are what will probably be needed to unlock its future (cant see it remaining without _atleast _help from Aus), day games here are night games on the West Coast of america, were potential viewers triple, win win. With one of the best and easiest ways to unlock that being to play games or a host a team there. Less good the further across Aus you get though. Jaguares wouldn’t be the same Jaguares, but I still would think it’s better having them than keeping the Rebels. The other options aren’t really realistic 25’ options, no. From reading this authors last article I think if the new board can get the investment they seem to be confident in, you keeping them simply for the amount of money they’ll be investing in the game. Then ditch them later if they’re not good enough without such a high budget. Use them to get Jaguares reintergration stronger, with more key players on board, and have success drive success.

19 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE Makazole Mapimpi: 'My life is somewhere I never thought it would be.' Makazole Mapimpi: 'My life is somewhere I never thought it would be.'
Search